User talk:71.62.246.124

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

January 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm ProtossPylon. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Zimmermann Telegram because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ProtossPylon 01:22, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Zimmermann Telegram. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Zimmermann Telegram was changed by 71.62.246.124 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.932343 on 2013-01-23T01:22:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:22, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

February 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, F. Scott Fitzgerald. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. The Anonymouse (talk | contribs) 01:22, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.