User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Response re MERS[edit]

A better way to insert those cites would be to add a new section called "Controversy" and summarize various academic critiques of MERS. For example, you could say that "MERS has come under heavy criticism from various directions from academia," and then go into specific examples, such as Professor Peterson's well-known attack on MERS as a two-faced monster. (Which is superficially appealing but itself is deeply flawed in many ways, but that's a debate for another day.) You could then say that some of these critiques have found a sympathetic ear from certain courts. --Coolcaesar (talk) 06:54, 5 January 2013 (UTC)