User talk:75.173.6.133

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

August 2010[edit]

Information.svg

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Daniel Adair, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Daniel Adair was changed by 75.173.6.133 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-08-18T19:26:25+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:26, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Information.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Daniel Adair. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Silivrenion (talk) 19:26, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Nuvola apps important.svg Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Barbershop music. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. L Kensington (talkcontribs) 19:53, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jeffries Projects, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Anaxial (talk) 19:56, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Stop hand nuvola.svg This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Milieu therapy. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Donald Duck (talk) 02:49, 19 August 2010 (UTC)


Stop x nuvola with clock.svg
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text , but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. SpencerT♦C 03:09, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

75.173.6.133 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribs deleted contribscreation log change block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

...if that's actionable so be it, I was only removing a vast amount of plagiarized material, and here's a reference to that definition of bleeding heart[1]. I didn't vandalize anything. What a waste to be blocked for no reason and then have another person unblock me, we could all be writing the encyclopedia. But alas, call me a vandal out of ignorance, but do not go so far as to fool yourself into believing that, I haven't. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.173.6.133 (talkcontribs)

Decline reason:

here you removed your vandalism a bot had removed, here you started edit warring without any discussion on the talk page and here you altered an innocuous disambiguation template. If you're removing material under a plagiarism claim you should cite where it is from on the talk page. Have a read of WP:CIVIL and it may help you some with your editing. WGFinley (talk) 04:31, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

I patiently await a response, as I had stated earlier when the editor with whom I asked to discuss the content, disputing my entries, first reverted them.75.173.6.133 (talk) 03:46, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Patiently should not be construed to mean I have only spare time, only that I expect a reasoned unblock and to go about my volunteerism.75.173.6.133 (talk) 04:23, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

My thanks to you WGFinley for your response.Elena Roe Sette (talk) 04:45, 19 August 2010 (UTC)