User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

June 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Business Man, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. JimVC3 (talk) 04:25, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Reverting at Kallar (caste)[edit]

Greetings, I've reverted your edits at Kallar (caste) because:

  • Your edits removed cited text, while giving no reason as to why the cited text was incorrect. There is an "Edit summary" line at the bottom of your editing window; if you don't use that, we often can't see why you made your edit, and will revert it.
  • One of your cites came from a blog, which does not meet WP:Reliable sources
  • Another cite you used to footnote "royal families" says no such thing; footnotes must directly support text, not just imply things in the direction of what one typed.

Hope this clarifies, feel free to ping me with any questions, and please consider taking 2 minutes to register for a free Wikipedia account, otherwise it's hard to communicate since your IP can change day to day. MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:40, 31 August 2012 (UTC)


Can you please see the book which clearly illustrates that Kallar are part of Royal family. It has been clearly mentioned in page 243.It is not subjective and it has concrete evidence in page 243.

I did indeed look at the book; part of what "Royal family"? That's extremely, extremely vague, with no context. If you'd like some suggestions on how to phrase it, feel free to directly quote the evidentiary bit on the Talk page of the article, and explain how you got "part of Royal family" from that page. Again, I suggest you get in account to make it easier for us to talk, though posting on Talk:Kallar (caste) would also make things easy. MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:12, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
In that book, what is "AN Kallar" supposed to mean? What does the AN stand for? Also, I see the bit you mention, but it's quoting a Kallar himself, which is not particularly authoritative, and it's also specifically in reference to the "AN Kallar", and again your cite gives no clarity as to the when/where/who of the claimed "Royal" nature. MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:16, 31 August 2012 (UTC)