User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

January 2010[edit]

Information.png Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Divine Right's Trip has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. ConCompS talk review 03:17, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Information.svg Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Lilith. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:04, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

September 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Segway PT, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. (talk) 21:44, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

November 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Mr. Holland's Opus has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. L Kensington (talkcontribs) 01:04, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

September 2011[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Saving Grace (2000 film). While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. —SMALLJIM  09:15, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits[edit]

Information.svg Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button Insert-signature.png or Button sig.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:42, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

The purpose of article talk pages...[edit] to provide a place for discussions on how to improve the article. Talk pages are not intended for general discussions about the subject, they're not there for you to post to as if commenting on a blog, their function is not to provide you with a place to write obscure and incomprehensible things vaguely related to the subject. They have one purpose, and one purpose only, to facilitate discussion about improving the article. Any post which does not serve that purpose is subject to being deleted, and a quick look at your contributions shows that many of them are in that category. Please stop, unless you're trying to provoke being blocked from editing. Make sure that any article talk page comment you post is directly related to improving the article. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:45, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Guido of Arezzo[edit]

Please remember to discuss matters that are only related to improving the article. hmssolent\You rang? ship's log 02:19, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

I did...i gave info to IMPROVE THE ARTICLE and some bonehead writes off my CITATED info as crap..because that person is unknowledgeable, re: the subject matter, that makes me WRONG?? go after him/her. not me.

Now follow me over to the info on ANCIENT NEAR EAST mythology, re: Mt Nisir, i'm about to make an IMPROVEMENT on that article too.