User talk:76.235.248.47

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

May 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Media conglomerate with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:33, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Main Event Championship Wrestling with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SeaphotoTalk 02:35, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Viacom/CBS[edit]

Hoovers makes it quite clear that the ownership stakes are held within National Amusements; I trust them implicitly with that information, so please do not revert that NA is the majority owner of both. Thank you. Nate (chatter) 05:40, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Wrong tab in Microsoft Security Essentials[edit]

Hello, 76.235.248.47. Welcome to Wikipedia. Sorry to bother you, but I just wanted to let you know that the tag that you used on Microsoft Security Essentials is a wrong one. You see, in lead sections of an article, you must use {{Citation needed (lead)}} instead of {{Citation needed}}; and you must do so only when appropriate. Please see the template's page (by clicking on my link) to find out more.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 10:20, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

December 2012[edit]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for long-term violations of WP:BLP. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 02:16, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2013[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page TNA Reaction has been reverted.
Your edit here to TNA Reaction was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/machinimasports) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:45, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

List of companies named after people[edit]

There is substantial opposition to your merger; the recommendation for a "bold" merge preceded the expression of opposition. Please reverse your redirect, and allow an uninvolved editor to decide this issue. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 07:04, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Well, if you truly believe in what you're saying, feel free to undo what I did. I'm willing to see if anyone has a better solution for the situation. 76.235.248.47 (talk) 07:12, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

April 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Championship Wrestling from Florida, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  
Your edit here to Championship Wrestling from Florida was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://pwfflorida.wordpress.com/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:29, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

June 2014[edit]

Thank you for contributing to Media conglomerate. The reason is was linking to the asset section of Viacom's main article is because when I corrected prior edits, those entries did not exist. I added them after I added to the Media Conglomerate page. It really doesnt matter to which it links. Both locations have the same information. Thank you for your contributions. Kevintampa5 (talk) 08:41, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

July 2014[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Media conglomerate. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. —    Bill W.    (Talk)  (Contrib)  (User:Wtwilson3)  — 13:00, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Cannolis. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Cannolis (talk) 13:58, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mutual Progressive Network has been accepted[edit]

AFC-Logo.svg
Mutual Progressive Network, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Redirect-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:22, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Lor. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. LorTalk 12:23, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Grupo Godo[edit]

I'm assuming the fact that it's red concerns you? It's red because there's no article on it yet. That can be fixed by writing an article on it, not by linking to another language Wikipedia. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 02:02, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

June 2015[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Happysailor. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Disney–ABC Television Group— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - Happysailor (Talk) 11:05, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Disney–ABC Television Group with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 12:25, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sony Pictures Entertainment, you may be blocked from editing.

If you want to make a fool of yourself, by all means, go right ahead. These links PROVE that the "Columbia TriStar Motion Picture Group" is referred to as the "Sony Pictures Motion Picture Group".

King Shadeed 18:07, June 7, 2015 (UTC)

My point was NOT to edit disruptively & it's was NOT to make a fool of myself, contrary to what you may think/believe. It's a rule here on Wikipedia that if you're going to post something, you need to give sources/references for what you're posting. In the case of you changing Columbia Tristar Motion Picture Group to Sony Pictures Motion Picture Group in several articles, you need to make sure you utilize references to show the change. 76.235.248.47 (talk) 22:26, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Then you should've CHECKED before you've added the "Citation needed" tag, right or wrong?? King Shadeed | Talk 21:34, June 7, 2015 (UTC)
Wrong, because as you SHOULD know by now, when it comes to editing Wikipedia, it's the responsibility of the editor that's adding or changing information (in this case, that would be YOU, as far as changing the Columbia TriStar Motion Picture Group references to Sony Pictures Motion Picture Group references) to cite sources showing what they're adding is legitimate. It's not MY fault that YOU weren't following Wikipedia guidelines/rules/whatever. 76.235.248.47 (talk) 02:38, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
I've checked behind myself, thank you very much! I'm done with this argument! King Shadeed | Talk 22:52, June 7, 2015 (UTC)
Well, apparently, YOU did NOT check behind yourself, as you claim; otherwise, I wouldn't have had to add to YOUR edits by posting references to Sony Picture's website where they reference the film studio group as "Sony Pictures Motion Picture Group". So, again (to put this as politely as I can without losing my temper), don't start going off on ME because YOU didn't do what Wikipedia editors are EXPECTED to do when adding information to Wikipedia articles. And now, I am done with this argument. 76.235.248.47 (talk) 03:07, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Disambig[edit]

Not necessary. Sometimes the disambiguation page may be named as usual, and the title of corresponding articles may contain parentheses to explain which area(s) the article covers. —ALittleQuenhi (talk to me) 16:35, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Viacom (original), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Creativity-II (talk) 05:30, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Viacom (original), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Creativity-II (talk) 09:57, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. Creativity-II (talk) 03:13, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Viacom (original). Despite your claims otherwise, the now-defunct original Viacom is still considered a TV syndication distributor. Removing the category to make that claim otherwise is disruptive (and there are other now-defunct syndication companies with articles here that still have that category in their article pages) and goes against consensus here, so don't remove that category again. Creativity-II (talk) 10:04, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2016[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at ABC Family, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Specifically, do you have any proof of the claims you're making about the stipulation by CBN (that ABC Family retain the word "Family" in the channel name in perpetuity regardless of ownership) being only "alleged" or "supposed"? Creativity-II (talk) 00:37, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Amblin Partners. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Carniolus (talk) 16:02, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not on User Talk:Creativity-II. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. You haven't proven that the CBN stipulation isn't real, which is why you didn't provide any proof yourself and why I had to add the citation templates. Attacking others for making good-faith edits will not get you anywhere and could get you blocked if you continue to be belligerent toward other editors. Creativity-II (talk) 23:38, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Re: Freeform[edit]

A channel is not a company. Sure, every other specialty channel in my company proclaims itself to be "a division of Bell Media", but because cable channels must be licensed in my country, the licenses are often held by channel-specific companies that are the channel (i.e. The Sports Network, which is owned by The Sports Network Inc., which itself is owned by CTV Specialty Television, which is owned by Bell but with a minority stake by ESPN). Given that all of its other assets have pretty much been amalgamated into other divisions of Disney in regards to content, ABC Family Worldwide is basically only a technicality. Freeform is a property, not a company. ViperSnake151  Talk  00:10, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

April 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Total Nonstop Action Wrestling without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Pinguinn (🐧) 22:01, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm ViperSnake151. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Entertainment One without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Is there a particular reason you replaced cited content with uncited content? ViperSnake151  Talk  15:51, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.