User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

March 2008[edit]


Hi, the recent edit you made to The Icewind Dale Trilogy has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Jonathan 17:01, 21 March 2008 (UTC)


The recent edit you made to The Icewind Dale Trilogy constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Jonathan 17:13, 21 March 2008 (UTC))

Could you explain to me how what I've entered is "unconstructive" or "vandalism". It's a third-party commentary on the literature in the "Reception" section, complete with verifiable reference link. And it was posted in good faith.

Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Even harmful edits that are not explicitly made in bad faith are not considered vandalism.