User talk:76.30.203.19

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
System-users.svg An editor has expressed concern that this IP address has been used by PorLaRazaNada.
Please refer to contributions or the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer for evidence. See block log and current autoblocks.

Welcome![edit]

Hello, 76.30.203.19, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!    Will Beback  talk  04:59, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

March 2009[edit]

Information.png Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page National Council of La Raza has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Leuqarte (talk) 19:27, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.   Will Beback  talk  04:56, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Can you tone down the edit summaries please? WP:CIVIL dictates that we don't use language like "racist pig" here. Thanks. --John (talk) 05:07, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Blocked[edit]

Your edits on National Council of La Raza have been determined to be disruptive and inappropriate for Wikipedia. In addition, you appear to be an IP sockpuppet of User:PorLaRazaNada. This IP address is blocked from editing for a week. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 19:20, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

76.30.203.19 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribs deleted contribscreation log change block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

I am a "sockpuppet" of nobody despite what lying racists are going to claim. If they had bothered to do a basic check they'd know this, but what a surprise that they abuse their power and make LYING ACCUSATIONS with no proof rather than actually follow procedures.

Georgewilliamherbert is retaliating against me for questioning his false claims here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Georgewilliamherbert#.22We_have_a_longstanding_policy_that_we_allow_users_to_vent_on_their_user_talk_pages_after_a_block._.22

I see how it works. This block is all just based on a lying pretext by George to justify his abuse.

George is one step worse, he's an abuser who abused his admin rights altogether here: User_talk:PorLaRazaNada

I hereby make a request for AdminReview proceedings against Georgewilliamherbert for his obvious abuse, racism, and his lies in claiming that NPOV-fixing articles is "racism" against users.

Decline reason:

You have been rightfully blocked for disruption/defamation in National Council of La Raza and for avoidance of block of PorLaRazaNada. (As for evidence, "if it quacks like a duck, it is a duck".) Request to unblock denied. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 21:53, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

76.30.203.19 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribs deleted contribscreation log change block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

Evidence is required for any proceedings. You are showing that you have none, simply that you are engaged in abusing your admin powers to try to control the content of an article in violation of wikipedia procedures. I again demand my right to grievance proceedings against you.

Georgewilliamherbert is defaming me claiming he blocked "because they're white supremacists" (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FIncidents&diff=279670107&oldid=279669584)

- of course this moron doesn't know that I AM NOT WHITE, and as an abuser he can't be bothered to pay attention or actually show EVIDENCE of the lying claim that I'm the user PorLaRazaNada (which of course there is none because I AM NOT).

Decline reason:

This isn't a court of law. WP:DUCK is obvious enough here. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:01, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

Block extended[edit]

Due to block evasion using other IP addresses, the block on this IP has been extended to six months.

Additionally, the NCLR page is now protected from any IP editing for a month.

Please knock it off. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 20:32, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Southwest Voter Registration Education Project[edit]

Your edit here shows a pattern of editing against Hispanic groups. Newport Backbay (talk) 04:46, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

March 2010[edit]

Information.png Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page I Love New York 2 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tiderolls 03:54, 7 March 2010 (UTC)