User talk:79.71.54.54
December 2009
[edit]{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. –xenotalk 00:45, 8 December 2009 (UTC)79.71.54.54 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear administrators, You are doing yourselves no favours whatsoever by refusing to co-operate. I don't think my clients will take very kindly to this kind of policy, and as for the standing in court of actions such as these, all I can say is that it is my legal obligation to point out to you that you would be very well advised to take heed of my previous statements, and provide me with a contact so that this issue may be discussed in private. Yours sincerely, Mr L Phillips QC
Decline reason:
WP:NLT is non-negotiable. Golbez (talk) 01:05, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- If you had read the above block notice you would see the email address provided as info-en@wikimedia.org. –xenotalk 00:51, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- Very well, I shall shortly be in touch to deliberate a suitable course of action.
Yours sincerely,
Mr L Phillips QC
- A few questions for you "Mr L Phillips QC": Which chambers are you member of? Which Inn of Court called you to the Bar, and which firm of solicitors has instructed you to represent this "client"? – ukexpat (talk) 02:54, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- FYI, ukexpat, not all QCs are barristers; some are solicitors themselves. — Sizzle Flambé (☎/✍) 04:18, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- A few questions for you "Mr L Phillips QC": Which chambers are you member of? Which Inn of Court called you to the Bar, and which firm of solicitors has instructed you to represent this "client"? – ukexpat (talk) 02:54, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, legal issues should not be discussed on wiki by volunteers. This needs to be handled off wiki by the foundation. Please do not discuss this issue further on-wiki. Chillum 04:46, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
May 2021
[edit]Hello, I'm Arccosecant. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Football records in Scotland—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. — csc-1 21:12, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Football records in Scotland. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — csc-1 21:20, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Football records in Scotland, you may be blocked from editing. Squeakachu (talk) 21:28, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |