User talk:81.203.105.99

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Come help with Wikipedia:WikiProject Fluid dynamics moink 23:11, 27 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Even if you modify that, it is a derivative work. You need the explicit permission of the author to do that. Also, please argue your case on Wikipedia:Possible copyright infringements. --snoyes 04:39, 11 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Derivative works is impossible when there is only closed information : the information only can be recieve from one source ----->>>> the maker. Everybody has the right to information. I could invent everything about this program, but the only athorized source is the maker.


Spam in LiveMove[edit]

Information icon.svg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on LiveMove, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because LiveMove is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting LiveMove, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 12:31, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of RaWrite for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article RaWrite is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RaWrite until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Isarra (talk) 07:19, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of STUX[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article STUX has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Keφr (talk) 09:19, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of FreeTTS for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FreeTTS is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FreeTTS until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Velella  Velella Talk   22:44, 23 April 2016 (UTC)