User talk:82.3.254.47

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

February 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Manuel Uribe, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Manuel Uribe was changed by 82.3.254.47 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.879761 on 2012-02-15T03:33:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:33, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Manuel Uribe with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SupernovaExplosion (talk) 03:40, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Worcester Cathedral, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Worcester Cathedral was changed by 82.3.254.47 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.892384 on 2012-02-15T03:43:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:43, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

On the contrary, it is not vandalism to mention the scandal: there is evidence enough at this link on a highly respected forum.

Stop hand nuvola.svg This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Worcester Cathedral. SupernovaExplosion (talk) 03:58, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

I have not committed ANY act of vandalism, merely made a statement of fact and provided a reference for it.

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SupernovaExplosion (talk) 04:14, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Internet forums are not reliable source. See WP:RS. --SupernovaExplosion (talk) 04:20, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
All right then. Could I say 'controversially' rather than 'scandalously', then?
No, in any case you cannot use that forum as a source. --SupernovaExplosion (talk) 04:26, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:27, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

March 2014[edit]

Please do not make changes to the Meon Valley Railway page unless you have a source to back it up, you are not allowed to say you have 'personal knowledge of news' as a reason to edit a page, continuning to do so will result in you being blocked from editing the page in future. Thank you user:zeoace 08:52 21/03/2014

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Meon Valley Railway, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. - Please read about the difference between published sources and original research. --David Biddulph (talk) 02:00, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Meon Valley Railway revert[edit]

I don't want to get involved in your edit war. Please do not revert contributions not being a part of the controversy you have raised.--Aaron-Tripel (talk) 20:45, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Fine. If you lost your login make a new account. And - I repeat - don't let your crusade interfere with other contributions having nothing to do with your issue.--Aaron-Tripel (talk) 20:53, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

The only edits I have reverted have been those reinstating the unsourced false claim. I reiterate: the claim that the group has disbanded is FALSE. Disingenuous. Dishonest. A DOWNRIGHT ****ING LIE. 82.3.254.47 (talk) 20:56, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
My edit [1] made on 8 april was lost due to your edit warring.--Aaron-Tripel (talk) 21:16, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Blocked[edit]

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as done at Meon Valley Railway. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Redrose64 (talk) 21:08, 13 April 2014 (UTC)