User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but you may want to consider creating an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address ( is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome!

November 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Maor Appelbaum may have broken the syntax by modifying 9 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:18, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

At User talk:A930913/BracketBotArchives/ 6#BracketBot – you asked about your edits to the Maor Appelbaum article. There are a couple of issues. First of all, when you work for Mr. Appelbaum you should take a look at our guideline on conflicts of interest. Writing about your employer is usually not a good idea. Secondly, the article's sources largely are unreliable, not independent of the subject, or they don't even mention him. That's not enough to establish that Appelbaum is notable enough for an article. Thirdly, what was removed was an extremely long discography that didn't cite a single third-party source at all. It would be much better to highlight a few works that have been reviewed in reputable music magazines (with Appelbaum's role discussed!) than to list dozens that no one has bothered to write about. Huon (talk) 00:16, 28 November 2013 (UTC)