User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

June 2009[edit]

Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Prostitution (criminology). When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 20:29, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Information.svg Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Prostitution (criminology), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -FASTILY (TALK) 20:34, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Please discuss your mass deletion at the article's Talk page before continuing. You're verging on WP:3RR and have been reverted by two different uninvolved users now. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 20:37, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

The talk page of the article, Prostitution (criminology) can be found here. -FASTILY (TALK) 20:41, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Nuvola apps important.svg You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Prostitution (criminology). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 21:05, 9 June 2009 (UTC)