User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Orologio rosso.svg
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • nuke contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log) (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

original block message

Decline reason:

Not currently blocked. See below. -- 18:31, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

You missused this template. Please follow the instructions listed in the block notice EXACTLY. 18:31, 19 April 2009 (UTC)


Ok, let me make this clear, this is not a sockpuppet. It is used for browsing Wikipedia, and the only edits made were to clear the userpage and talk-page of Macromonkey, nothing else. It is not being used harmfully or maliciously, so doesn't qualify as dangerous, thank you (talk) 17:06, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

It doesn't have to be "dangerous". Wikipedia editors need to keep track of banned users and their IPs. It's really that simple. -- Brangifer (talk) 20:10, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
It's pointless, it's not even being used for editing etc, and IPs can be changed with very little effort, it serves no purpose. And please don't edit my userpage (talk) 20:20, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
If it's not used for editing, how did the above text appear... :) Drop it MM, you had your chance. This IP will end up blocked if you continue. Verbal chat 20:36, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Because I had the new message notification, and theres nothing to drop, I just want to do my browsing in peace without having constant notifications. And i would like to point out to tell people to stop editing my userpage. (talk) 20:52, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
You don't own this page. If you continue to evade blocks and make disruptive edits, this IP will be blocked as well. (talk) 16:12, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
My edits have not been remotely disruptive, all I did was blank my former userpage and talk page. I then used this to state that I had no intention to edit articles, merely remove labels on my own page. And perhaps I do not own it, but it is rude to edit the userpage of someone else, and if I were to do the same, it would be considered vandalism. I have not been rude or disruptive, so I see no reason for my IP to be blocked. However, if someone wished to discuss the issue fairly and directly with me, I would be happy to do so. In the meantime, I will restore my version of the userpage, as it is a harmless statement, which I use to make the purposes of this IP known. If the issue is resolved, I will have nothing more to do and happily retire from the wiki, but I feel this is the last issue that needs sorting. (talk) 16:55, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
You can browse without any user page. You don't need this, and you shouldn't respond to any notifications. As an indef banned user you have no right to editorial access of Wikipedia in any way, shape or form. Just browse without leaving any tracks. Now ignore everything here and stop editing, which includes making any form of change on any page at Wikipedia. -- Brangifer (talk) 03:55, 22 April 2009 (UTC)


Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Granville Sharp, you will be blocked from editing. Jasper33 (talk) 14:48, 7 May 2009 (UTC)