User talk:87.81.230.195

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome[edit]

Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (87.81.230.195) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! Mike Christie (talk) 18:06, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi![edit]

Re Golliwogs. if your still there somewhere, can you have a go at rejigging the sentence that you commented on. Amandajm (talk) 10:27, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Not right this minute as I should have started doing something else a couple of hours ago! I'll give it some thought tomorrow. 87.81.230.195 (talk) 10:52, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

FYI[edit]

I've made this edit. :-) hydnjo (talk) 05:03, 2 June 2009 (UTC)


FYI II[edit]

Radioactivity from TV screens: [[1]] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Quest09 (talkcontribs) 18:32, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Queen Rania[edit]

(Question transferred to Humanities Reference Desk under previous related question 87.81.230.195 (talk) 06:03, 20 August 2009 (UTC))

personal RFC on sneeky edit[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Planetary_habitability&diff=311665773&oldid=311665338
I'm curious to know, do you consider this kind of edit sneeky and/or not encyclopedic??
GabrielVelasquez (talk) 15:13, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Since I (1) have had no previous involvement in (or even knowledge of the existence of) the article and discussion in question, and (2) am as yet too unfamiliar with the technical workings of Wikipedia to figure out what's actually been going on here, I do not feel able to form any meaningful opinion. Sorry. 87.81.230.195 (talk) 02:17, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Can you make any comments on this?[edit]

I just copied this from our recent discussions, and it would be appreciated if you could find any errors and be able to provide the grammatical reasons (here bellow or in my talk page). If you want, please delete this post onecs you read. Thank you.

Or, here are few other options:

In 1, the sentence needs a subject that can correspond the second clause, like--In order to be understood a speech, proper articulation and pronunciation are necessary.
In 6, the correlative conjunction lacks parallelism; needs a parallel NP, like--I was told that I could get both a degree in designing and a position to become a teacher.
The 8 have options on split infinitive, like--When we go to the lake on weekends, I have to sleep either in the car or in a broken down bed.
The 10 is vague in terms of its subordination. An options would be--I have often heard the saying that 'experience is the best teacher'. —Mihkaw napéw (talk) 21:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
I'm sorry not to be more helpful, but I don't think it would be appropriate to pursue such questions away from the appropriate Reference Desk, and I do not have the time or inclination to become engaged in one-to-one tutorials (for which I am not professionally qualified), or to spend more time on Wikipedia than I do already. 87.81.230.195 (talk)

Barnstar[edit]

Resilient Barnstar.png The Resilient Barnstar
To 87.81.230.195, for helpful work at the RefDesk. Axl ¤ [Talk] 12:18, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Ref Desk user[edit]

There is a banned user (formerly known by the login name Light Current, among many, many pseudonyms) who just can't seem to stay away from the Ref Desk. While his posts are sometimes innocuous, they often are not. He has a regrettably long history of abuse and harrassment of other editors, as well as vandalism of the encyclopedia. When he isn't using a sockpuppet account, you can identify him from his IP address. He edits from Tiscali UK DSL addresses — IP addresses beginning with 79.76. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 04:59, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

You can view TOAT's edit history and easily keep track of which IP the banned user is currently using. The problem is that the current Wikipedia system takes about an hour to block his current IP and it takes him a couple minutes to change it. -- kainaw 01:24, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, guys. I'm also aware of the individual's recent comments on this discussion section, and their subsequent removal by one or other of you (with which I acquiesce, they still being visible in History anyway). Those comments' creation, content and tone did not appear to me to strengthen the individual's moral position. 87.81.230.195 (talk) 18:13, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, 87.81.230.195. You have new messages at WP:RD/H.
Message added 08:11, 9 May 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

╟─TreasuryTagCaptain-Regent─╢ 08:11, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Question on List of Peninsulas[edit]

Hi. I am trying to bring the attention of editors to a question on List of Peninsulas talk page. This relates to the "isthmus" issue that seems to have remained unanswered in previous inquiries on the same talk page. By solving the example I set forward maybe we could also reach a consensus on what is the peninsula standard that should be used. If more than one standard exist (for example, traditional or popular use and academic use) we could explain them all(?). Please let me know if you would like to contribute to this question. Thank you!Ilidio Martins (talk) 12:16, 28 May 2010 (UTC)