User talk:98.218.94.104

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
To see this IP Addresses other talk page, Click here: User talk:68.34.4.143
Crystal Clear app xclock.png 98.218.94.104 is busy working in real life until Spring Break and may not respond swiftly to queries. If you have an urgent matter, it may be best to leave a message on the weekend or a holiday.

AIV Report[edit]

Information.svg Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you! --VS talk 03:46, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Did I just do something wrong? 98.218.94.104 (talk) 03:47, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Please stop adding the same AIV reports over again. When the report is removed - please leave it & don't re-add the same report. Best regards, --Kanonkas :  Talk  03:50, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Sorry. 98.218.94.104 (talk) 03:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

AIV report declined[edit]

Thank you for the vandalism report [1] you recently made at WP:AIV regarding 67.168.186.33 (talk · contribs). However, I have declined to block [2] this IP because the last warning issued to it was 321 days ago [3]. Please note that as per AIV criteria #3, "the warnings must be recent," which generally means during the current calendar month. If you have any other questions or issues, please feel free to leave me a note on my talk page. Thanks, Kralizec! (talk) 03:56, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button Button sig.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 23:12, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Naming conventions[edit]

Hi there. I noticed your request for the VeggieTales article to be renamed VeggieTales®. Typically, we do not use symbols such as ® or ™. For more information on style guidelines and conventions along these lines, see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (trademarks). --Icarus (Hi!) 01:36, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Cars Toons[edit]

I am going to help you out here, because apparently you do not understand the instructions at WP:RM. Your request for changing the title is incomplete, because you have not provided any place for discussion on the talk page, at Talk:Cars Toons. 199.125.109.126 (talk) 03:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: your message about Lila (Peanuts)[edit]

It is important to understand that Wikipedia operates on a principle of consensus opinion. And consensus is found through a discussion by editors. In the case of the Lila (Peanuts) character, a discussion was held at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lila (Peanuts) and there was a clear consensus that the character should not have a separate page, but rather should be merged. It was merged into Snoopy, Come Home. This is reasonable because on any page where Lila appears in a plot, the name can be linked to the information and when someone searches on WP for Lila they will still be directed to the correct info. Although you may disagree with the consensus, you still need to yield to it. There have been plenty of Afd discussions in which I also found myself on the opposite side of the final consensus. Every editor who works on WP does at some time or another. But we say "Okay", take a breath, and move on. When someone refuses to move on, it is considered disruptive to the project. So, in all fairness and consideration to your fellow editors, it is wise to simply move on. There are plenty of other places to help edit. Good luck. CactusWriter | needles 08:57, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

User talk namespace edits[edit]

A few of your recent edits, particularly ones such as these [4], are considered disruptive. Please be more mindful when commenting on user talk pages. ~ Troy (talk) 03:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC)