User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search



Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Nate1481(t/c) 14:03, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

May 2008[edit]

Stop hand nuvola.svg This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Senso Ryū Aikijūjutsu, you will be blocked from editing. You have been repeated told not to interfere with other editors talk page contributions. Please cease doing so from this account as well as from User:Tenteisai. Repeatedly blanking warnings from your own talk page content will not make problems go away. Thank you. --David from Downunder (talk) 00:50, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Stop hand nuvola.svg This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
So you go and do it again here. You obviously need a word from an admin. --David from Downunder (talk) 01:26, 9 May 2008 (UTC)--

Stop hand nuvola.svg Please stop reverting the comments of others on Talk pages, and stop changing articles from "British English" to "American English." Thank you. —Mrand TalkC 13:47, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Stop hand nuvola.svg This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Talk:Senso Ryū Aikijūjutsu.
Any further vandalism will result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. STOP REMOVING CONTENT FROM ARTICLE TALK PAGES David from Downunder (talk) 06:11, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please do not delete your talk page, even if you are another user. Spitfire8520 (talk) 22:53, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button Button sig.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 02:40, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Information.svg Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Senso Ryū Aikijūjutsu. Thank you. David from Downunder (talk) 10:20, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop hand nuvola.svg This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at Talk:Senso Ryū Aikijūjutsu, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Calling other editors "goofs" and "fuck tards" is totally unacceptable. David from Downunder (talk) 10:25, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

GFDL violation[edit]

So, you are claiming that you didn't copy text from another site into Wikipedia? Instead, you are claiming that you copied Wikipedia content to another site in violation of the terms of the GFDL? --David from Downunder (talk) 11:26, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

The purpose of this License is to make a manual, textbook, or other functional and useful document "free" in the sense of freedom: to assure everyone the effective freedom to copy and redistribute it, with or without modifying it. (talk) 02:15, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
That is one of the purposes, but there are obligations involved too. One of those obligations is to provide proper attribution for copied material. I am amazed that anyone thinks that it is acceptable to copy copyrighted material without providing any attribution, even someone who has stated their indifference to reading Wikipedia's rules and guidelines. -- David from Downunder (talk) 15:23, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
I know I'm beating a dead horse, but why would I need to attribute my own work? that makes no sense at all.(Tenteisai 20:56, 29 May 2008 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tenteisai (talkcontribs)
For a start, it's not just your own work... you are ignoring the contributions of other editors. Secondly, you are ignoring the licence agreement terms. --David from Downunder (talk) 21:46, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
ok show me anything of substance that was not done by me, I've done all the sourcing, provided all the information and tried in vain to add pictures and better description of the system and it's training methods,I'm not going to attribute some spelling corrections.( (talk) 23:31, 29 May 2008 (UTC))
Wrong on many counts... for one thing, sourcing has nothing to do with copyright. As for your "trying in vain" to do things - it's your flouting of the Wikipedia guidelines and refusal to do what is acceptable that is the problem. And many attempts by others to improve the article have been impeded by you, like the six reverts you did on one hour here. Contributions by others go well past "some spelling corrections"... here are four examples: [1] [2] [3] [4]. As usual, you think it is OK for you to ignore the GFDL and make up your own rules. (P.S. Thank you for indenting your response, but do you think you can add one colon instead of four in future?) --David from Downunder (talk) 08:53, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
the six edits where done by someone trying to change the whole feel of the article, by making it like a commercial, this person tried in vain to open a "Senso-ryu Aikijutsu" article as well. I started this article to present the facts and history on Senso ryu not make it a commercial or selling point for the Aiki-jutsu academy. The system uses ten attackers at once in the higher ranks. There not "possible", they actually use ten attackers, sometime the whole class attacks you, they even train in complete darkness sometime, I can't prove the training in the dark stuff, so I didn't add to the article. Controls and freezes are not counter attacks there preemptive strikes, I didn't change the Tori comment(even those they don't use it), the 3rd link I don't see anything of any great deal that needs to be mentioned, in the second link there was all this crap about samurai and there use of weapons on the battle field etc. trying to link Senso Ryu with the samurai, it's like posting a Martial genealogy/History and just adding yourself in, when I found the edits had merit, I left them, I'm trying to keep the article on it's original track presenting the history and facts about Senso Ryu not grandiose up play, just the facts. (Tenteisai 20:49, 30 May 2008 (UTC)) p.s. like this (Tenteisai 21:03, 30 May 2008 (UTC))

I made a mistake Kencusan didn't try to make a Senso-Ryu Aikijutsu page he did ;

 Senso-Ryu Aikijutsu

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Senso-Ryu Aikijutsu. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. -- Longhair\talk 12:19, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

(Tenteisai 21:07, 30 May 2008 (UTC))

So, the upshot is that I showed you substantial changes made by numerous other editors beyond that of spelling corrections. --David from Downunder (talk) 06:38, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
are they still there.....nope(Tenteisai 23:56, 2 June 2008 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tenteisai (talkcontribs)
do you exhibit good manners.....nope --David from Downunder (talk) 02:59, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Ha,ha,ha,ha...thanks( (talk) 22:58, 3 June 2008 (UTC))