User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

April 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Prescott Bush, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. GcSwRhIc (talk) 15:13, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Prescott Bush, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- Arthena(talk) 18:41, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Prescott Bush article?!?!?!?[edit]

What UNCOSTRUCTIVE about my editing of the Prescott Bush article?!?!?!? I was simply adding information that made the article more accurate. Please contact me at to discuss this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 18:59, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Hmm, maybe I was wrong. If an unregistered user adds a nazi reference to an article, then 99.9% of the time it is vandalism, so that's why I classified it like that. The fact that there was no edit summary also made it more likely to be vandalism. Arthena(talk) 06:17, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

I don't know what an edit summary is...and I was just trying to repair the article's incorrent refs and CLEAR misquoting of references; the Wikipedia article implies that the companies in quention were not officially determined to be held by German's involved with the Nazi party even thought the paragraph RIGHT AFTER the one quoted says that later this was determined to be the case. Stuff like this is why conspiracy theorists still hold so much ground despite their craziness....