User talk:99.90.196.227

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, 99.90.196.227, has made unhelpful edits to the page Germanwings Flight 9525, which have been reverted. If you did this, in the future please try to contribute in a more constructive manner. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! JoeSperrazza (talk) 11:06, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

JoeSperrazza (talk) 11:06, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

June 2014[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 06:50, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2014[edit]

Information icon Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Timeline of the 2014 pro-Russian conflict in Ukraine. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 06:13, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing.
Note that editors don't particularly care what your point of view is, so long as you edit constructively. Using talk pages as a forum and introducing comments such as this is unacceptable behaviour. Also, remember to sign your comments!
Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:06, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent edits[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Button sig.png) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:25, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at ELinks. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 20:57, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, 99.90.196.227, has made unhelpful edits, which have been reverted. If you did this, in the future please try to contribute in a more constructive manner. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! 220 of Borg 06:06, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

moreon fd[edit]

novel The Phantom Ship (1839)[nb 4] by Frederick Marryat. This in turn was later adapted as Het Vliegend Schip (The Flying Ship) by the Dutch clergyman, A. H. C. Römer. In Marryat's version, Terneuzen, in the Netherlands, is described as the home of the captain, who is called Van der Decken (of the decks).

who finds himself on an ancient ship with an aged and listless crew.

died at the age of 71 on Sat., Feb. 5, 2011 sataarday 4th March 2011

Brian Jacques died on February 5, 2011 of a sudden heart attack. Saturday night (February 5). “It was sudden,"http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/303422

Liverpool - Brian Jacques, the former merchant sailor and author of the Redwall series of books, died of a heart attack at the age of 71. "We are sorry to relay the news to all of Brian's friends and readers of his passing on the evening of February 5th 2011. His family wish to convey their thanks for the many messages of condolence they have received," states a message on his website.

He died at Royal Liverpool hospital on Saturday night (February 5). ttp://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/internationally-renowned-liverpool-author-broadcaster-3382245 “It was sudden," The Liverpool Echo quoted his brother Jim Jacques as saying. "He had to go for an emergency operation on an aneurism that had appeared on his aorta and they just couldn’t save him.”

Literary legend Brian Jacques, 71, had to have emergency surgery for an “aortic aneurism” - a swelling on the heart’s main artery - but despite attempts to save him he died at Royal Liverpool hospital on Saturday night (February 5).

His family is devastated. He leaves behind a wife, Maureen, and two sons, Marc, a carpenter and bricklayer, and David, a contemporary artist.

Today his brother Jim Jacques, speaking for the whole family, said they were in “deep shock”.

He said: “It was sudden. He had to go for an emergency operation on an aneurism that had appeared on his aorta and they just couldn’t save him.”

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/08/07/assassinations-by-induced-heart-attack-and-cancer/ Is death by heart attack, burst aneurysm, of cerebral hemorrhage a “natural cause”? Not if government agencies have found a way to influence your heart rate, blood pressure, or vascular dilatation

==Flying Dutchman this is.

References

July 2014[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Talk:Malaysia Airlines Flight 17. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Drmies (talk) 19:45, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
  • You are blocked specifically for disruptive comments on Talk:Malaysia Airlines Flight 17. Editors agree that your comments are disruptive, though they disagree on whether you're intentionally trolling or just adding incoherent text--but that these edits are disruptive is agreed on. After this block expires, please edit in accordance with talk page guidelines, don't use talk pages as a forum for your opinions and theories, and PLEASE copyedit your comments carefully. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 19:48, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Button sig.png) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:36, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Solid state fermentation has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 09:49, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Babita arora 10:13, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

  • false acusition, the text (which you cleaned) was in wikipedia several years, and was not my. I only added a paragraph wich was obviusly not (c). 99.90.196.227 (talk) 08:40, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Janusz Korwin-Mikke. kashmiri TALK 17:09, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

User talk:Kashmiri answer 99.90.196.227 (talk) 08:40, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

corrections etc[edit]

Notes:

  • Benjamin Netanyahu is generally well licked in the U.S. Will his speech charge that?[1]

WASHINGTON - 'The House on Tuesday[15/3/3] passed a bill that would fund the Department of Homeland Security for the rest of the fiscal year,' < as predicted.

References

March 2015[edit]

Please don't link common English words as you did recently in three articles. See WP:OVERLINK. Also, I have reverted this edit because it wasn't in the sources and there was no logic in it — loss of blood wouldn't indicate the devices were low on the ground. This addition was unsourced, made no sense (what bridge? and how do you march "through" a bridge?) and had a very stramge edit summary. That's four out of your five latest edits that were unconstructive and had to be reverted. If your editing doesn't improve, I'm afraid I'll have to block you for a longer period than your previous blocks. Bishonen | talk 22:35, 8 March 2015 (UTC).

Your recent edits continue to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please stop! @Bishonen: JoeSperrazza (talk) 11:13, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Headline changing story[edit]

its most sad. Sometime hedline changing stories change other headlines.

New York Times - 5 hours ago

PARIS — Andreas Lubitz was breathing, steady and calm, in the final moments < Q: what did he breathing? A: French air . 99.90.196.227

This was the day Natanyahu was denaing Natanyahu 'not on my watch'. And day before Israel was denaing to spy on US.

in 'most sad' you can change t to + and depending on fonts you use it may look even more sad.

during Ron Paul campaign in the time of his first victory the hedlines coluded news about deth of Whitney Houston. That was obvious time for us to conclude the most sad MO. The terror real or actored is to change way of thinking of masses by mass media so the othervise obvious will be somehow obscured. This is becouse the truth is self adjusting state only perturbating the state can keep the lie for some time. pesymistic is hovever that each lie need bigger amount of energy to cover the other lies , optimistic (for world peace) is howevwer (calc e:mc2:ih/t) the nuclear bomb energy is not suficient to perturbate the state in the final stage du to it relatively short time of action. So do not dare it -anyway sad mo no chance deceptit.

March 2015[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of one month for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Bishonen | talk 11:24, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
If/when you return to editing, please consider the following. I think you are not being intentionally disruptive, but that is the effect of your edits. If you need help, try posting questions here before you edit articles. I think you need to learn more to be able to edit effectively.
Here’s a list of bad quality edits ‘’just from today’’: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. All have been reverted, except the ones you edit-warred back. JoeSperrazza (talk) 11:26, 27 March 2015 (UTC)


Robin said that the co-pilot Lubitz's responses, initially courteous in the first part of the trip, became "curt" when the captain began the mid-flight briefing on the planned landing. Lubitz is thought to have manually set the plane on the descent that drove it into the mountain.[90] The screams of passengers can be heard on the voice recorder in the final seconds before impact[91] but Andreas Lubitz was breathing 'Frnch air', steady and calm, in the final moments[1] < and you belive someone will buy it?

References

  1. ^ http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/27/world/europe/germanwings-crash.html quote 'Andreas Lubitz was breathing 'French air', steady and calm, in the final moments'

Palmyra[edit]

Please see WP:OR. Thanks. CassiantoTalk 11:41, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

More problematic editing[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm JoeSperrazza. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Biodegradation, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. These edits [7], [8] have no cite provided and appear to be original research JoeSperrazza (talk) 09:14, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Information icon Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Palmyra. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. This [9] another example of problmatic edit you made, shortly after returning from a 30-day block made by @Bishonen:. Once again, you provide no cite of a reliable source. It is either an error, original research, or vandalism. JoeSperrazza (talk) 09:25, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Once again, your you provided edits [10], [11] that were uncited, had no reliable source provided. They also had a spelling error. I am concerned that you need to ask for help or advice before each and every edit. JoeSperrazza (talk) 09:31, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Haavara. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not edit war [12], [13] to reintroduce [14] uncited materiel with no reliable source JoeSperrazza (talk) 09:37, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Final warning[edit]

Right, thank you, Joe. 99.90.196.227, an edit such as this isn't just original research, it's a personal reflection, something that has no place in an encyclopedia. Joe is right that you need to ask for advice before editing articles. Use the WP:TALK talkpages! And absolutely no edit warring. This is your last warning: I'll block you for 3 months if you persist. Bishonen | talk 09:41, 25 May 2015 (UTC).

On the need to add citations and how to do it[edit]

Organic mater biodegrade to resale CO2 is rather 18 century original research.

Hi, the issue is that your additions to articles need citations, not that the process being discussed was invented some time ago. I will say that your edit here [15] is an improvement, in that regard, to your prior edits to articles in that you did include a citation - thank you. That edit is also better than your prior edit to that same article today [16] in that you used citation format rather than a raw reference. JoeSperrazza (talk) 18:35, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
You are doing better - thank you. I'd like to help. Click on this link -> [17] to see what I did to improve the way you added your reference to the Biodegradation article.
Thanks again for improving your editing by using references. I hope you'll see that using citation templates is even better and will start using those. If you need any help, add Template:Help me to your talk page by adding a new section like this:
==How does X work?==
{{Help me}}
Your question.
~~~~
Good luck and thanks for your contributions. JoeSperrazza (talk) 19:03, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

no it is false zioisiue. the issue is fallacy you propagate in so called free knowledge compendium which is bit of insult to any conscious being. Is it true u break the order of words here?

References[edit]

Your recent edits[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Button sig.png) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:17, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for continued disruptive and incompetent editing after your previous block, such as antisemitic remark here, absurd rationale for edit warring here, and offensive remarks on this very page. For other warnings, see above. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | talk 08:36, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

But this news was NYT source (so quite semitic). But the first chronologically source use the z-word a lot. Anyway i was trying to change (seeing yours rampant reaction)

  • Saakashvili play now the role of governor in zionist run Ukraine southern regions of Odessa
to
  • Saakashvili play now the role of governor in 'self' run Ukraine southern regions of Odessa
so you-z can float in antisemantic falacy

Also you linked here to the older version, with later corrected errors, this is not nice to misrepresented (quite in z-way) the edits in progress. The almost last version was this

There is on internet opinion = Wikipedia is zio co-op (or info-cop) , so let BiDaSic it (LOL) for some period as you insist by blocking this IP.

November 2015[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Talk:2015 Russian Sukhoi Su-24 shootdown shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. LjL (talk) 21:04, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Button sig.png) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:45, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Aegis Combat System. - theWOLFchild 18:51, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

LOL because of this? It is easy to check it is true. The shield was obsolete already in antiquity and after 500 BC Greece was conquested by Persians, Spartans, Macedonians, Romans, Ot.Turks, Bavarian, Germans and finally IMF bankers.

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Aegis Combat System. - BilCat (talk) 01:37, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for continued disruptive and incompetent editing after your previous blocks. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  The Bushranger One ping only 06:15, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 The Bushranger One ping only 07:41, 20 December 2015 (UTC)