User talk:A.amitkumar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Page related to Samarth[edit]

Hi. I am new to Wikipedia. I am the person most effected by this case and most of the information written online about it for which the links have been put (e.g. Bloomberg, Rueters etc) are one sided accounts. I was incarcerated at this time and could not get in touch with the media. Since it was a foreign country I was not freed to look for a lawyer and I simply could not fight the case in any proper manner. Now I dont know who is the guy making such pages on wikipedia and I just want to correct it. The information has been put out their very vehemently. (For example someone even created a twitter account by this name and started tweeting anti-american slogans from the id. It took me 6 years to come out of all of this then report this to Twitter and get the false information removed).

Hi, I notice that there is a serious Conflict of Interest issue here especially when removing content or adding content without valid reference points. Please refrain from editing this article in a way that violates wiki policies. Please try to add references that prove the neutrality of your edits. Please do not get into a revert war either without valid references.  A m i t  웃   18:35, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi, the reason I didn't include any sources was because I found the information in the provided sources.
No this was not the case, especially for content you removed in the article, which is the bigger issue here.  A m i t  웃   18:43, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
This is nothing but another form of cyber-bullying. I am not an avid Wikipedia user. I would like to know how can I add a Court's trial transcripts (United States Court's Documents) as a source of information on Wikipedia. (Whoever has created the page has written his/her own inference of the facts, using a hateful language while citing links to news articles and not court documents). Since it directly effects me I would like to correct the information put here. The best source of facts is the Court Documents. Would appreciate your help in putting a reference to those here.
You first stated there were sources, now you state there are court documents. I would prefer you go and get this resolved in ANI or any other admin can help you with clarifying your cyber bullying complaints, as this place has fail safes in place and you are not dependent on only one editor, but until i see that there is changes to the article not adhering to wiki policies, I would not be letting the edits happen.  A m i t  웃   19:15, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Like I said, I do not use wikipedia. The above comment, "Hi, the reason I didn't include any sources was because I found the information in the provided sources." was not made by me. I have no idea who made that comment on your user page. I am not looking for your pity. So please understand I do not expect you to "let the edits happen". I just thought you were better than me at using Wikipedia so I hoped you would help me figure out how to make a reference to a Court Document in a wikipedia page. (wikipedia is weird. It says that comment was made by someone at

Dash ‎[edit]

Hello. I didn't include a source about the French usage of dash because it is a wide-spread common knowledge about the French language: any source would be only ERROR sorry . I have re-entered the section because I thought its removal was the result of a bug. If you still think you know better than me, then remove it again, and I won't keep insisting. (in the version you "deleted", i however mentioned novellist George Simenon.)

Nomination of Software in retail for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Software in retail is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Software in retail until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.