User talk:A.amitkumar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

WP is not a place for knowledge gathering anymore, by arguing here you agree to be one of the assholes messing up WP
This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.

Page related to Samarth[edit]

Hi. I am new to Wikipedia. I am the person most effected by this case and most of the information written online about it for which the links have been put (e.g. Bloomberg, Rueters etc) are one sided accounts. I was incarcerated at this time and could not get in touch with the media. Since it was a foreign country I was not freed to look for a lawyer and I simply could not fight the case in any proper manner. Now I dont know who is the guy making such pages on wikipedia and I just want to correct it. The information has been put out their very vehemently. (For example someone even created a twitter account by this name and started tweeting anti-american slogans from the id. It took me 6 years to come out of all of this then report this to Twitter and get the false information removed).

Hi, I notice that there is a serious Conflict of Interest issue here especially when removing content or adding content without valid reference points. Please refrain from editing this article in a way that violates wiki policies. Please try to add references that prove the neutrality of your edits. Please do not get into a revert war either without valid references.  A m i t  웃   18:35, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi, the reason I didn't include any sources was because I found the information in the provided sources.
No this was not the case, especially for content you removed in the article, which is the bigger issue here.  A m i t  웃   18:43, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
This is nothing but another form of cyber-bullying. I am not an avid Wikipedia user. I would like to know how can I add a Court's trial transcripts (United States Court's Documents) as a source of information on Wikipedia. (Whoever has created the page has written his/her own inference of the facts, using a hateful language while citing links to news articles and not court documents). Since it directly effects me I would like to correct the information put here. The best source of facts is the Court Documents. Would appreciate your help in putting a reference to those here.
You first stated there were sources, now you state there are court documents. I would prefer you go and get this resolved in ANI or any other admin can help you with clarifying your cyber bullying complaints, as this place has fail safes in place and you are not dependent on only one editor, but until i see that there is changes to the article not adhering to wiki policies, I would not be letting the edits happen.  A m i t  웃   19:15, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Like I said, I do not use wikipedia. The above comment, "Hi, the reason I didn't include any sources was because I found the information in the provided sources." was not made by me. I have no idea who made that comment on your user page. I am not looking for your pity. So please understand I do not expect you to "let the edits happen". I just thought you were better than me at using Wikipedia so I hoped you would help me figure out how to make a reference to a Court Document in a wikipedia page. (wikipedia is weird. It says that comment was made by someone at

Dash ‎[edit]

Hello. I didn't include a source about the French usage of dash because it is a wide-spread common knowledge about the French language: any source would be only ERROR sorry . I have re-entered the section because I thought its removal was the result of a bug. If you still think you know better than me, then remove it again, and I won't keep insisting. (in the version you "deleted", i however mentioned novellist George Simenon.)

Nomination of Software in retail for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Software in retail is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Software in retail until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

February 2016[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at The Magicians (U.S. TV series) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Alex|The|Whovian? 07:49, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

You are also involved in an edit war at Smriti Irani where you continue to delete reasonable edits with sources. Kindly refrain from such activity, as it is not in the spirit of Wikipedia. Givemeplease (talk) 08:20, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Givemeplease - The edit made by A.amitkumar on Smriti Irani is not considered to be edit warring (at this time). The user has only reverted one edit today, and hadn't edited the article previously since two days ago. Please review Wikipedia's guidelines on edit warring and the three revert rule; it will help you understand what is and is not edit warring. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:26, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Noted. However, A.amitkumar has deleted sourced information on two instances since February 27. Even when I re-added the information being very charitable to the other point of view, it was deleted.
If you dont know what you want to accuse me off, then you need to be better prepared! Trolling is what you are doing here.  A m i t  웃   08:35, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
I apologize. I just realized that the first major edit on the Smriti Irani article was made by another user. Your subsequent edit was a minor one but your comment 'Really stupid!' on that edit led to my misunderstanding. Givemeplease (talk) 08:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
None of this excuses your actions at the page that this warning was originally intended for, or your reply to it. Alex|The|Whovian? 10:34, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Bugger off!! Already told you to go talk to an admin, surely you would have found some one to listen to you by now! May be you need to get your sob story straight first!  A m i t  웃   15:10, 29 February 2016 (UTC)