Jump to content

User talk:ACORN812

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jasmine Kaur Roy (July 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 20:40, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jasmine Kaur Roy

[edit]

Hello, Roy.avinash. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Jasmine Kaur Roy".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 07:11, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jasmine Kaur Roy, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article moved to draft

[edit]

Hello, I recently moved an article you created to Draft:Jasmine Kaur Roy.--SamHolt6 (talk) 18:15, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SamHolt6, I am wondering why it has been moved to draft when there has been considerable updation and all references are independent and verifiable. Request you to please reconsider. Roy.avinash (talk) 18:37, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jasmine Kaur Roy for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jasmine Kaur Roy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jasmine Kaur Roy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:21, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Roy.avinash. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Jasmine Kaur Roy, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em) 15:31, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amoli (film) (June 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Etothepi was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
•≈20+π(talk to me!) 14:55, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, ACORN812! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! •≈20+π(talk to me!) 14:55, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ACORN812, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 18:10, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]