User talk:AH999

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search



Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous



October 2014[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at CSD. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - MrX 00:02, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

September 2015[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 17:07, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

AH999 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

I've been away for a year, and I haven't used Wikipedia since last year, someone must have got into my account, as it wasn't me AH999 (talk) 17:11, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Even if this is true, we don't unblock compromised accounts. Max Semenik (talk) 18:02, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

@MaxSem: What am I supposed to do then? AH999 (talk) 18:04, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Um, stop lying to us? Max Semenik (talk) 18:37, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
When can I start editing Wikipedia again? AH999 (talk) 18:39, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

@MaxSem: AH999 (talk) 16:37, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

When you make a successful unblock request and we unblock you. Suggest starting reading with WP:OFFER. By the way, you're not hacked anymore? Max Semenik (talk) 16:40, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

@MaxSem: Do you know of any willing admins? AH999 (talk) 16:54, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Let me be blunt. First, I don't believe your "hacking" story. Second, it's amazing how you were aware of the block but not aware of the edits the "hacker" made. Finally, this block cannot be reversed except by me or by another CheckUser.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:02, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
@Bbb23: Are you or another checkuser willing to accept the WP:OFFER? AH999 (talk) 17:23, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
If you want to return six months from now and request again to be unblocked, it will be considered. However, it's highly unlikely it will be accepted unless at a minimum you come clean as to your socking, and that includes dropping (now better than later) the hacking story. Even if you do all that, no promises.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:48, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
@Bbb23: Ok I wasn't hacked and yes I was socking, but when I created the Sociable Computer account my intention was not to deceive but for a fresh start, I shouldn't of created that account as I cannot clean start when a block or ban is in effect, if am unblocked I promise I will do my best to become a good editor. P.S. am I still able to visit Wikipedia and read pages? AH999 (talk) 17:53, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
What about TeaLover1996 and ComputerTechGuy?--Bbb23 (talk) 18:40, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
@Bbb23: Yes and those. And my other question. AH999 (talk) 18:46, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
"Blocked users can continue to access Wikipedia, but cannot edit any page (including their own user pages), except (in most cases) their own user talk pages." (WP:BLOCK) --Bbb23 (talk) 19:47, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
@Bbb23: So basically, if I don't attempt to edit, create any accounts or evade my block for the next 6 months, I stand a good chance?, also could I opt to not submit an unblock request for longer than 6 months? AH999 (talk) 19:50, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
I would put it differently: If you attempt to edit, create any accounts, or evade your block, you stand no chance. Yes, you can wait longer than six months.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:53, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
@Bbb23: Okay well see you in April or subsequently from then. I hope you don't hate me for this. Happy editing AH999 (talk) 20:11, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Unblock Request[edit]

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

AH999 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

I have had 6 months away and am ready to start afresh, I will frequently read Wikipedia's policies, at least twice a week in case of changes to the policy, I will try and not to get into conflicts with other editors, and if it happens I will discuss any problems with them calmly to find a solution. AH999 (talk) 05:44, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

@Bbb23: @SQL:. I left this request alone because it seemed to be under investigation. It now appears to have fallen through the cracks. If any admin who previously considered this request feels otherwise they are welcome to undo this review of mine. AH999, your previous unblock requests seem to be an attempt to say whatever is needed to get back. Your false story about your account being hacked and your use of multiple accounts has damaged your credibility. We rely on trust here, and I just don't see it. HighInBC 15:08, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

@Bbb23: AH999 (talk) 13:05, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi AH999 - please note that User:Bbb23 has not edited since 15 March - Arjayay (talk) 13:52, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi @Arjayay: any idea how long I need to wait for a response? AH999 (talk) 15:21, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Never having been blocked, I am afraid I don't - I understand that some admins only consider lifting blocks that they imposed themselves, as they are familiar with the background, and are not "treading on anyone elses toes". However, with Bbb23 being away, that means there could be a delay. Your request appears on the list at Category:Requests for unblock although I do not fully understand that table. I suggest patience - after 7 months another day is no great deal - Arjayay (talk) 15:44, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
@Arjayay: Okay cheers. AH999 (talk) 15:49, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
You were blocked by a checkuser - and only checkusers can unblock in this case. You will need to wait patiently for one that has free time to review this block. SQLQuery me! 23:34, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
@SQL: Are you recommending an unblock?--Bbb23 (talk) 15:34, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
@SQL: AH999 (talk) 22:37, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
@Bbb23: AH999 (talk) 19:11, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

While the blocking admin is welcome to reverse their own action, unblock requests are handled by uninvolved admins. If you only want Bbb23's consideration then stick to pinging and avoid the unblock template(I think you already figured this out). I will defer to Bbb23's wisdom on this matter. HighInBC 01:44, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

@HighInBC: Any clue as when I will receive a reply? AH999 (talk) 03:15, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Nope. HighInBC 03:28, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
I have little to say. Based on your history, I would not unblock you. Although only I or another CheckUser can unblock you, that doesn't mean I wouldn't listen to the recommendation of another administrator, which is why I asked SQL when they put the unblock request on hold, whether that's what they were doing (there's usually no reason to put it on hold otherwise). If they had responded positively, I would have asked for their reasons. As you know, that didn't happen. It also doesn't look like any other administrator wants to intervene, so I'm done here. You can wait longer and try again, or you can seek relief either through WP:UTRS or the arbitration committee.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:58, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
@KrakatoaKatie: I have participated in the standard offer previously, what does this mean for me now? AH999 (talk) 05:32, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
@Bbb23: Doesn't every one deserve a second chance? and I give you my word it won't happen again. AH999 (talk) 06:09, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Talk page access removed[edit]

Since you have had you unblock requests reviewed and you are now basically begging and pinging people every day I have removed your talk page access. You may appeal you block at WP:UTRS if you like, or if you prefer you can find another website. HighInBC 16:24, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Orologio blu.svg
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

AH999 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #16827 was submitted on Nov 01, 2016 00:59:56. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 00:59, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Orologio blu.svg
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

AH999 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #16829 was submitted on Nov 01, 2016 14:25:55. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 14:25, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Orologio blu.svg
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

AH999 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #16830 was submitted on Nov 01, 2016 17:02:12. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 17:02, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, AH999. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)