User talk:AJP

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome message[edit]

Hello AJP and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

Good luck!

Cuddington Heath[edit]

Hi. I'm just making an article about Cuddington Heath which should explain the matter a bit more. Basically the village is called 'Cuddington Heath' but the actual civil parish is called 'Cuddington'. In this case the parish has no substantive settlements, so the articles Cuddington, Chester will just be a redirect to Cuddington Heath, but I think the disambiguation should stay. Cuddington should link to all Cuddingtons, indeed, whether they be heath or not. I guess also it should link to Coddington, which is also nearby in Cheshire ;) Morwen - Talk 23:21, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

Request for your opinion[edit]

Good morning AJP! I noticed you've edited a topic related to Jimmy Edgar somewhat recently, and was hoping to collect viewpoints on an aesthetic issue. If you had a minute to contribute to the discussion/vote on the infobox photo, that would be very helpful. Earflaps (talk) 11:02, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pandora logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pandora logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.   JaJaWa |talk  08:56, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Teenage Cancer Trust[edit]

Hi, I noticed your change to Teenage Cancer Trust article. Just for information the trust web site is stretching the truth here as Castle Hill is not actually in Hull but it is in Cottingham which is in the East Riding of Yorkshire. Cannot correct the article as the reference is wrong! Keith D (talk) 23:54, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

@Keith D: Thanks for the info. I agree it pushes the boundaries of Hull somewhat, but I thought it fitted "28 units in cities including..." better than Cottingham, and I hoped the reference would help. I also encountered Greater Hull while pondering my edit, so it seems Hull can be tricky to pin down! AJP (talk) 19:47, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Copyeditor Barnstar Hires.png The Copyeditor's Barnstar
Thank you for fixing my spelling on Constitution of Saint Kitts and Nevis. It is much appreciated! ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 18:22, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Charlie Elphicke[edit]

Thanks for sorting out the name. Someone had put in a new link to the full name but I got a warning it was unsafe. I said on the talk page that it was being edited by WP:SPA's but they have now broadened their scope ..to include my user page!
Regards JRPG (talk) 13:29, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, AJP. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, AJP. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

External links[edit]

Hi, Could you please stop removing the external links from {{Official website}} - There's no need to remove the external links and infact it makes like much easier if for instance the template malfunctions in one way or another, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 19:14, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, I've only just noticed you were partially reverting my edits. I won't be making any more such edits. I thought using {{Official website}} without any parameters was the preferred "basic usage" according to the template's documentation, as it means the links are centralised on Wikidata. Swings and roundabouts, I suppose. AJP (talk) 19:23, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi AJP, No worries, As your other edits were helpful I thought just reverting here would be a dickish move, I hadn't realised the template docs state it's fine however in the 4-5 years of being here I've never once seen it just be "{{Official website}}" without link part, My worry is the template may assume a website is that persons when it's not so as a precaution I personally like to add the links but as I say I've never seen the template just used on its own,
As for the Wikidata thing - Anyone can easily vandalise it and the problem is the vandalism will go unnoticed so again as a precaution I would rather not rely on Wikidata especially when nothing's ever checked or reverted,
Thanks for your reply it's greatly appreciated, Happy editing :), –Davey2010Talk 19:56, 15 June 2017 (UTC)