User talk:Aajkibaat

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Aajkibaat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 11:18, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rajat Sharma may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [[File:India TV's Chairman and Editor in Chief [[File:Rajat Sharma.jpg|thumb|Rajat Sharma]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:18, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Manu Sharma[edit]

I have reverted your out of process move at Manu Sharma. Per WP:COMMONNAME the article title reflects the most common usage and is therefore correctly titled "Manu Sharma". The fact that you went through the article and attempted to wipe out that name through the removal of reliable sources and the actual falsification of the references is both completely contrary to Wikipedia policy and very disruptive. If you want to make an argument for a page move you can do so following the the appropriate process. If you are concerned about content, raise the topic on the talk page and get consensus for the changes.--Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 16:29, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 16:34, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for disruptive editing. I was very clear that your edits were disruptive and would lead to a block. I provided you with the information you needed in order to request a page move and pointed you to the talk page to discuss your concerns, but you ignored the advice and the warnings. Once your unblock expires it is imperative that you stop the page blanking, out of process moves, falsification of reference titles, and disruption at Manu Sharma and discuss your desired changes on the article talk page to see if there is consensus for the proposed changes, otherwise you will find yourself blocked again. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 16:42, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Your first and only edit upon expiry of your block was to again blank the same sourced information and its associated citation from the same article, as such I have restored the block. The block is of indefinite duration, that is you are blocked until you can demonstrate to a reviewing admin that you will not continue the same disruptive unexplained blanking and will instead seek consensus for the changes you wish to make through discussion with other editors.--Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 20:30, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
And I've just blocked a number of your sock accounts.--Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 17:22, 12 June 2014 (UTC)