User talk:Agathman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Alternative splicing[edit]

Thank you for rewriting this article. --Firefly's luciferase (talk) 21:48, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Creation-evolution controversy[edit]

Thanks for your corrective edits. You preserved the original intent. I appreciate your sensitivity. Regards, Afaprof01 (talk) 02:03, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer[edit]

Wikipedia Reviewer.svg

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 02:22, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Rfam entry new article for review -- notability?[edit]

Hello, Allen,

I reviewed a new Rfam article via the AfC backlog project. I declined it because 1) it was too dense for a college level general interest reader to understand at even a high level, and 2) I could not find notability independent of the Rfam project itself and the article publishing the new RNA splice site.

You can find the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation#Geeky project self-notability?.

If you don't mind, could you take a look at the discussion and answer the questions? Or even be so bold as to review the AfC?

Let me know. Thanks. -Dovid (talk) 17:46, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)