User talk:Albatalab

Welcome!

Hello, Albatalab, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Comorian passport, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Karl 334 ^{☞TALK to ME ☜} 19:07, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Comorian passport[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Comorian passport requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Karl 334 ^{☞TALK to ME ☜} 19:07, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unbloc[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Albatalab (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i dont deserve to be blocked and my account was blocked for false accusationAlbatalab (talk) 11:28, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This userid is not currently blocked. If you cannot edit, please follow the exact directions provided when you try (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:51, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

WIKIPEDIA blocked my user and i can't do any edits or creat and article and i dont see any valid reason for that and i believe my account should be unblocked as soon as possible

December 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Qatari passport. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. RashersTierney (talk) 15:49, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

blocked by a user called Shizhao for no valid reason[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Albatalab (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

global block — i was blocked by a user called Shizhao for no valid reason , he accuses me of having an "open proxy" and thats not true,i hope an adminstrator of the website would help me becouse am not able to edit any article until 15 February 2012

Decline reason:

As noted above, you MUST use the unblock request exactly as it's provided to you when you try to edit: we cannot guess IP addresses. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:56, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I do not see any kind of block applied to your account. Please post here the exact message which you see when you try to edit. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 12:51, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of diplomatic missions of Serbia[edit]

According to this diff it seems you may not be aware of WP:NCMAC. If you could take few mins to familiarize yourself with this policy, that'd be great. Thanks! Dolescum (talk) 11:43, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Economy of Serbia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| colspan="18" | Source: IMF <ref>[http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2010/01/weodata/weorept.aspx?sy=2000&ey=2015&scsm=1&ssd=1&

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:20, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Albatalab

I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).

So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.

What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.

The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.

Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:14, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bosnia and Herzegovina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Serbian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Slovenian identity card, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macedonia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:04, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cyrilic[edit]

Pleae, do not remove official language from wikipedia articles without ANY agreement or consensus. Your edits have been reverted. Thank you. --WhiteWriter^speaks 22:05, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia cares. All of those are actually used in Cyrillic, so your arguments are not valid. Official language of the country should be used by default, there is not a single good reason to remove official name of the undisputed region language code. Again, please, do not edit war, and start talking in normal way. --WhiteWriter^speaks 22:18, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, not true... Official is ONLY cyrilic, as company name must be written and registered in Serbian Cyrillic letter per law. So, official usage is both letters, but names are and officially MUST BE only in Cyrilic. You can check that on Serbian Business Registers Agency website. Thats why we have to place it as it is officially, and not as it may be (in Latin) also. --WhiteWriter^speaks 22:43, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

STOP with reverts, as we DIDNT agree anything. Cite me the reason and wiki guideline per which you are reverting and removing official names? --WhiteWriter^speaks 22:45, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, per WP:NC we can and should use all letters of the country in articles lede. Do you have any wiki guideline to cite that support removing of official letter from articles? What exactly is the problem with cyrilic, so you want it out of all articles? --WhiteWriter^speaks 22:49, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, then native name is then only both letters, FIRST Cyrillic as official, then Latin, but bigger problem is that you must not remove Cyrillic letter for article as you think it is unrelated. As official language, it must be in article, no matter what do you think how related is it. Its Serbian company in Serbia? Yes? Then Cyrillic. Simple as that. --WhiteWriter^speaks 22:55, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is encyclopedia. We must not remove everything that average English readers cannot read, as we would remove half of the database. We should follow guidelines. If language is official in both letter per communication, and only in one per letter, than that must be presented like that in Wikipedia also. --WhiteWriter^speaks 22:57, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, i think that is wrong too. We should not follow what letter company use in their own marketing, as thia encyclopedia should be neutral and unrelated to their business strategy. We should follow wiki guidelines and official languages. I am going to sleep now, and will fix those as agreed. All best! --WhiteWriter^speaks 23:07, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 31[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Apatin Brewery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Serbian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Visa requirements for Mauritanian citizens[edit]

The article Visa requirements for Mauritanian citizens has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant content, only a single map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tazerdadog (talk) 08:20, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Visa requirements for Mauritanian citizens[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Visa requirements for Mauritanian citizens requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:19, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Albatalab/Comorian passport[edit]

User:Albatalab/Comorian passport, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Albatalab/Comorian passport and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Albatalab/Comorian passport during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 01:00, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Serbian New Zealanders, did not appear constructive and has been or will be undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:54, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Albatalab. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Albatalab. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]