User talk:Alias777

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Page blanking[edit]

Um, why do you blank your talk page? I don't know what to do because by blanking your talk page you remove the warning. Nol888(Talk) 02:46, 25 February 2007 (UTC)


You can do anything you want to your user page, but it's considered bad form to delete warnings from your talk page, especially if you have in fact vandalized articles (and that's what you did to Target and Microwave oven). Deor 02:20, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

    Well I had just registered...Alias777 03:18, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
If you aren't the Alias777 who was active in October 2005 (take a look at your user contributions), perhaps you should register under a different username to prevent confusion. Deor 04:20, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Va Tech[edit]

Resolved, thanks Chris.

First off, please post at the BOTTOM of my talk page. Second of all, No, you are supposed to update the sources if you change the facts. Otherwise, the sources are either false or you are false. In these situations, I will err on what a source says over what you say. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:52, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
I am not the one changing the facts. It would be me making an assumption that you have a valid source, which I chose not to make as you did not provide it. If you make the change, it is your responsibility to properly cite it. As I stated before, it leaves me to either say a.) some editor I dont know is correct, or the citation listed right before it is correct. I followed the link, said 22 and reverted it. All i ask is that you properly cite any changes. Thanks! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:56, 16 April 2007 (UTC)


The next time you post an uncivil comment or edit summary, such as this edit summary here], you will be temproarily blocked for a cool-down period. Please remain WP:CIVIL and WP:COOL. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:20, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Dealextreme[edit]

A tag has been placed on Dealextreme, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dawn bard 03:35, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Just to let you know[edit]

Your user page appears to have been vandalised. I haven't reverted in case this is intentional. John Hayestalk 09:34, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Yes in theory it is, but blocking is "preventative not punitive", it is used to prevent incidents, not to punish users. If this user made some vandalism a few days ago, he couldn't be blocked now. If you do want to report him, do so at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. The first step though would be to the appropriate warning message, you can find these at WP:WARN start with a 1st or 2nd level message, then increase the level. If they continue, and break level 3 or 4 warning, then you can request a block. The admin generally won't block someone who has never been warned (how can they know what they are doing is wrong). John Hayestalk 13:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Oh and one other thing, it's good practice to post new talk messages at the bottom of a page, not the top, I've moved you comment to the bottom of my page. John Hayestalk 13:39, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

September 11, 2001 attacks semi/protection[edit]

Hello. That tag just displays an image, it affects neither the semiprotection (which is why you were able to edit the article), nor a full protection (meaning only sysops are able to edit it; I lifted full protection earlier today). Hope this clears things up. El_C 08:24, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

The Pirate Bay[edit]

Please be aware that the article on The Pirate Bay is about their site in general. Its not about just their tracker. Their tracker has been down for months but they are still in operation. Therefor their status is still "Active". Unless they discontinue their site then the status does not change. JeremyWJ (talk) 21:13, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Alias777. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)