Email this user

User talk:Allen4names

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

The Signpost: 18 August 2016[edit]

Rina Satō article[edit]

Hi, I was wondering if you'd like me to give the Rina Satō article the filmography overhaul as I have with other VAs using VADB and Doi references? It'll get rid of the rowspans for the years as it has most of the material sorted by release date. I did Megumi Toyoguchi's one recently. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 00:58, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

@AngusWOOF: Go ahead although you may want to just {{ping}} me on the articles talk page for something like this. – Allen4names (contributions) 02:15, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 September 2016[edit]

Nana Mizuki[edit]

I noted you have been working on the actress' article. By searching online, I found an interview from something called "The Last's Program Guide" where Mizuki expresses joy for being a main character in The Last: Naruto the Movie. Any idea what is The Last's Program Guide? Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 21:27, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

@Tintor2: Not anything you should not be able to figure out yourself ie. that it may be something distributed to those who saw the theatrical release. Regards. – Allen4names (contributions) 22:59, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Allen4names. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

S-CRY-ed‎[edit]

I've been wanting to clean up S-CRY-ed‎ but first things come first. I could very little reviews of the show. Can you help me find more reviews of the series so that I can expand its reception section? Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 17:30, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

@Tintor2: No. You will need to find someone who has the August 2003 issue of Newtype USA if you want access to that review. – Allen4names (contributions) 18:02, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Level 2 header for character lists[edit]

I always find that plot is heavily tied to characters, and is why I used level 3 headers in my articles; akin to how the plot often has links that list to the character articles. Is there a reason you changed my edit to level 2? DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 03:46, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

@DragonZero: I generally expect a character list to fall under a level two heading. BTW if it was not my edit to the Rozen Maiden article you may want to provide a diff. – Allen4names (contributions) 03:56, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Clarification on 'my edit'? Aside from that, there's no problem if I change it back to level 3 then is there, or do you wish to discuss this further? DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 04:02, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Go ahead DragonZero. Please leave a HTML comment just in case. – Allen4names (contributions) 04:05, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
What kind of comment? Are you talking about the comment which I assume is suggesting the adoption of a def list (MOS:DEFLIST)? DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 04:18, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
@DragonZero: I was thinking someting along the lines of "Do not change to a level two header without discussion." – Allen4names (contributions) 04:21, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

_rem template arguments[edit]

Is there any way to avoid this? It confuses the bots. For a mechanism to track deadurl status consider posting at CS1 help or track it some other way. When something looks like a argument there is a good possibility it will be processed by bots or even restored with that _rem name by a well meaning editor later. Generally personal reminders shouldn't be left in wikitext. -- GreenC 14:25, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

@Green Cardamom: I fixed the greater than (<) symbol you left in the edit(s) you linked to. As for the rest hopefully I will be able to consider it later as I am not feeling well at the moment. Regards. – Allen4names (contributions) 22:23, 15 April 2017 (UTC)