User talk:AllyD

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Abour Dev (Leader) articles[edit]

I am sorry to inform you that Nepalese Farmers are dominated by Other society of Nepali, but Mr, Dev is fighting for farmer respects and development in Nepal. so, e like him too. ple sir, help us to create this page . Our group thanks you too much for your cooperation.(Redirected from Wikipedia:SOCK) we use official laptop due to electricity problem,

Shiva Prasad Dhawal (born July 14, 1987), better known as Dev or Dhawal (sometimes stylized as DEV or dEV), is a Nepalese Farmers’ Leader, Writer (Article, Story, Poem Essay and Song), Agro Planner, Farming in Farm, Self business and radio/FM host. He was discovered by the record label in Madhesh of Nepal, In FSC Rupandehi, and A real Farmer via Myspace after His friend Rajesh and Mahesh, posted His Ledgering to some beats. Farmers’ Short Videos " Organic Farming" was Sampled in Far East Movement's organic Farming "Rice Farming in Nepal" which reached number 1 in the Nepal, and sold over 80% farmers’ work on their Agro business in the country. He was Participated to Paddy Day in July 2007, and Speech His idea to develop Nepal By Farmer "Economic Crisis is Eliminated by Agro Development in Nepal" Which reached the top Leader Speech in the Nepal. His first poem The Love Thinker in Nepali was publics on 2008 in Chhitijh Yearly of BMC Annual Book. Dev in 2008 Confrence with Rupandehi FM about politics |leadership in Nepal, EPs and the second part as a follow up to part one. He's a radio host of the popular radio by Siddharthanagar, founded in 2000. In 2016 Dev started promoting “International Farmers’ Work as Self Business” A real Article book, which is set to be released after 1st “International Farmers’ Day” of Jun 10, 2017 in Kathamandu Nepal.

about this articles is on process of working (creating) us to make a critical article's, but never delete this page. if any problem about it then send a message on ( or 00977-9801346702) I try to correct it. Thanks User:Dev_Dhawal

Tea Nguyen[edit]

Hi. Thanks for your review and suggestions. I also notice that qTrace and qTest eXplorer should be merged but as a new wiki user I'm not too sure how to do it. For the qTest eXplorer page it is a renamed product so I feel it should be mentioned since qTrace no longer exists, yet the secondary sources for qTest eXplorer are not that many. Any suggestions on how can I re-write (or merge) the two articles and remove those tags?

For the proposed deletion of qTest. It's a major product of a company, there are lots of products in same category that have wiki pages, with length at that short, so I don't know why qTest got restricted. I tried to include only historic data and relevant information that someone of interest would want to know about qTest. I also tried to include some secondary sources as possible... Not too sure how to best write article as such since I made no attempt of advertising or so...

It will be much appreciated to let me know. Thank you. Tea Nguyen (talk) 3:30, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Liberty League[edit]

It definitely is notable. It's been mentioned in national press a number of times...

Regarding speedy delete of Onarbor page[edit]

Hi AllyD, I created the page, Onarbor, and would like to fix it such that it will be acceptable to be published on Wikipedia. is my website and company. Our business model is based off of Kickstarter that is why I used Kickstarter's wiki page as a guide to developing our wiki page. I apologize for cutting and pasting kickstarter's page in order to create Onarbor's page. I took a break from finishing Onarbor's page before removing the blatant copyrighting without realizing that Wikipedia editors would delete it so quickly before I had a chance to finalize it. My sincere apologies, this is the 1st wikipedia page I've ever created. I've re-submitted the Onarbor page to address the copyrighting. I've removed all references that were Kickstarter-specific and changed the sentence-structure and wording to be unique to Onarbor. Hopefully this will be more in line with Wikipedia's policies. Again, I'm truly sorry about this. Thank you,

Tim Peterson User:Trpeters1

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Thanks for reviewing Akanwali, Haryana, AllyD.

Unfortunately Kudpung has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Please add Template:Infobox settlement

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

Regarding TWL mailing list subscription[edit]

Hi, thank you for your invaluable contributions to The Wikipedia Library as a coordinator. As you might know, it currently is a tough job to keep every coordinator updated on announcements, and to get in touch with fellow coordinators. We are beefing things up a notch for better communication among the coordinators of TWL. Flawless means of communication is crucial for the success of any team. Hence, we've decided it is essential for all coordinators (existing and new) to be subscribed to our mailing list I've added your email ID (the one used for correspondence with TWL) to the subscription list of the mailing list. You are of course welcome to use a email ID of your preference unsubscribing this one. When subscribing, please make sure you include your Wikipedia username in the field "Your name (optional):" to help us keep track of subscriptions. Either way it is crucial that you are subscribed to the list.

You can change your preferences by logging into the interface here. You should have received a welcome mail which contains the password to access your account in the mailing list.

Please contact me (User:UY Scuti), or Jake (User:Ocaasi) or Nikkimaria (User:Nikkimaria) if you have any questions/concerns/issues. Regards—UY Scuti Talk 17:54, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Hi, I'm Cotton2. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Jaditoner, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Cotton2 (talk) 08:26, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Software glitch, no tags on article, but showed as reviewed status. Thanks for reviewing. Cotton2 (talk) 08:31, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Vandalism of a registered user[edit]

Vandalism of a user registered in the article :Barranco de Badajoz.-- (talk) 15:23, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Leroy-Somer India[edit]

This page is a copy vio too. Lead is copied from
FYI, regards --220 of Borg 07:26, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Re-review my new page[edit]

Dear AllyD, you did review twice my creation of Impak Finance article. I since made a major upheaval of it in order to correct the flaws in it, yet I still am unsured if it would pass wikipedia's filter. Since you did put the page for AfD and none other than me commented on it, I felt the survival of the article may rely entirely on you.

I truly do wish to at least make it available so at least the open source nature of Wikipedia may join in it's contribution. I made the following corrections:

  • I indeed reviewed the self-promotion prose of the first article in the aim of making it truly neutral. I truly hope I succeeded.
  • I worked on the notability issue. I reattached the two references from canadian national medias, but this is the part that indeed does make me unsure about the article. While both are independent and notable, they are in french and they are, well, only two (I couldn't find a minimal number of references needed on the wikipedia notability rule page). This is the one that leaves me most uncomfortable, I truly hope the article may pass this filter.

So anyway, I rely on you about it. I hope the changes were good enough. Otherwise, it's okay, I saved a copy and will try again another day.

Thank you very much

Et443367 (talk) 16:04, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

You flagged my page and I need your help[edit]

Dear AllyD, you reviewed my article on Professee. You have raised 3 flags: 1- A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. I understand the first one to mean that you consider me too close to the subject of the article. Then who should write/edit the article to solve this issue? 2- The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for products and services. This topic is about an online game, how does it relate to the notability guidelines? Can you please give an example of what I have wrong? 3- This article relies too much on references to primary sources. Most of the info is from one source which is the portal of the game, but the information is true and referenced. How should this be changed?

I'd appreciate any and all help as I'm a first time Wikipedia contributor.

Please note that I changed around the number and content of references, and also reduced from external links. Is this enough to remove the tag "This article relies too much on references to primary sources."?

Seecosm (talk 14:05, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

  • No, the references need to be what other people have said, not what the Professee site or Facebook says about it. Only reliable 3rd party sources are suitable and can establish whether this product is notable. AllyD (talk) 14:07, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Kris Degioia[edit]

She is not writing for herself! She saved my sister from taking her own life, due to cyber bullying. After that she became my mentor and I am simply using her account to make this page for her. She has helped a lot of women and men. The only reason she signed to be on the show the daily push is so she could reach a lot more people (since the show is worldwide) on cyberstalking. If I need to created my own account to clear up any confusion please let me know, bc I am writing his not her. Krisdegioia (talk) 19:11, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

I have replied on this user's talk page to a similar message. JohnCD (talk) 17:11, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy delete of DJ STELLA page[edit]

How dare you!! Please provide the original information ASAP DJSTELLA (talk) 15:06, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

  • Replied on User Talk page. AllyD (talk) 07:00, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of SunTecIndia[edit]

Hi AllyD, Thanks for checking my first wikipedia article i.e. SunTecIndia. I noticed that you nominated it for speedly deletion and the reasons i can see are:

  1. 1: It does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant.
  2. 2: The article appears to be about an organization or company

Well, i completely agree with those highlighted stuffs and have also taken some actions by removing the text/content that were looking promotional or not standing for an encyclopedia information. I request you to please check that.

Also, as a newbie in creating a wiki article. I want to ask some questions from above mentioned two points and I will be glad if you can help me this this. Because, this will help me to improve my understanding and knowledge of Wikipedia.

Question #1: Is the subject is not important then why this company page is still present Because, as i can read this, i did not find any useful information and many things relates to the things i mentioned in my article. And, there are many pages like this. So, whats the secret ingredient for that

Question: #2: Yes! its ia bout an organization or company and there are again many pages in Wikipedia reffering to any company or organization page. And, i created this page so that community should know the history of an 17 years old IT firm, which will actually help them to understand more on the firm.

And, i guess almost all brand pages are meant for that, excepting the pages of Big Billioners MNCs. I hope you are getting my point.

Please let me know the answers of these two questions and also provide me the suggestions on how can i further improve my article. Because, i really want to become a valuable contributor on wiki and its my personal will and not doing it for any profits.

Looking for your kind support :)Mikewilsonn1 (talk) 07:45, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

  • This is an encyclopaedia not a Yellow Pages for companies, whether they have been operating for 1, 17 or 500 years. Existence is not encyclopaedic notability. I am seeing nothing to indicate that this is more than a firm going about its business. Regarding articles on other firms, feel free to nominate them for deletion if notability is not evident. Incidentally, what does this even mean: "Passionate about innovating and developing solutions with unique ability to think out of the box and intuitively grasp the evolving business needs."? Pure marketing methane. AllyD (talk) 09:09, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Hey AllyD, thanks for your feedbask and thanks a lot for notifying me the issues with that line, i have completely removed that. Secondly, i understand its not a Yellow Page platform, ofcourse! and i agree with your next point as well.

Alright, i am not asking you to remove the deletion nomination, rather if possible can you please send it to draft so that i can search for more useful information instead of just making it look like an promotional stuff for the organization.

Thank you!Mikewilsonn1 (talk) 09:33, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

  • You are free to reinstate it in Draft - as it was before you moved it back into mainspace with the same problems as in July. If you are going to pursue this, you need to read the WP:COMPANY notability guidelines.And if you have any affiliation with the company it must be disclosed. AllyD (talk) 09:37, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

July!! That's a long story AllyD. No i don't have any affiliations with this company. I just dont want to let my first article hanged in draft and thats why i scheduled a f2f interview with the CEO which took lot of efforts of mine, and you wont beleive i have a long document of the interview questions, but unfortunately i can't share the complete insights from that too, because it containt lots of promotional lines which i personally dont want to share on an encyclopedia platform, because i understant for what the platform is - Anyways, thanks a ton for your kind help. Could you please tell me from where i can put it in draft, i don't know that Mikewilsonn1 (talk) 10:09, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

But thanks for sharing WP:COMPANY, i am sure i can consider the things mentioned here.Mikewilsonn1 (talk) 10:12, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Referenced provided on shoppingpak[edit]

Dear allyD brother. as the shoppingpak organization was launched in 2016 it have less coverage but all the information provided on wikipedia is correct ant true as the citing is mentioned. please recommend. thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mechengrasim (talkcontribs) 14:33, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

  • A Facebook page, two press releases and a listing are not references. AllyD (talk) 15:12, 24 October 2016 (UTC)