User talk:Altamel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Wikipedia in a nutshell

Hello, Altamel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  —Wknight94 (talk) 00:24, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Oregon Law[edit]

Per your note to another user, I thought you should know that the Oregon Legislative Counsel Committee won't be pursuing any copyright claims re: the ORS. Whew. It's still a bad idea to post the text of bills, of course. Cheers, Valfontis (talk) 05:22, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

@Valfontis: Well, that certainly is good to hear—though under WP:NFC posting the full text might still be a bad idea. I'm sorry to see you've had some trouble with the page author; thanks for maintaining a reasonable level of patience given the circumstances. Hopefully everything works out. Though I have to say, your state legislature is awesome! (you've probably seen this already). Thanks, Altamel (talk) 05:51, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
I don't even have to look, it has to be Rick Astley! :) And yes, they are. Valfontis (talk) 05:57, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Hello: Regarding this edit: Consensus is that all edicts of government, without exception, including laws of Oregon, are public domain in the United States: Wikipedia:Public domain#Works ineligible for copyright protection and #Public records. This consensus seems to be based on case law and the position of the US Copyright Office. I am under the impression that there is no consensus to remove such material only because a state government wrongly claims it is copyrighted. However, Bills introduced into a legislature, which have not been passed by that legislature, are not laws or "edicts of government". So Senate Bill 166 isn't a law and will presumably be copyrighted for that reason. Best regards. James500 (talk) 23:13, 8 March 2015 (UTC)


Hereby I present you with a lead image ... Hafspajen (talk) 13:59, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! Very appropriate analogy. Altamel (talk) 23:10, 6 March 2015 (UTC)


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Altamel. You have new messages at Lost on belmont's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Lost on  Belmont 3200N1000W  (talk) 23:48, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

(Misplaced message, June 8)[edit]

Your post on my talk page is blasphemy and lies. How can you say anything is 'fact' when there is no evidence that everything we see isn't just a hallucination or an illusion? reality is just what the world collectively agrees is true. When someone experiences a hallucination we say what they see or hear isn't real because the majority do not sense it, but in reality there is no evidence what we sense is even there. Everything is opinion, even the so called 'facts' on this website. If this is such an 'objective' site, why should the opinion of the minority on what constitutes 'fact' be censored because of the opinion of the majority? Nothing in the end has any proof of reality, and fact itself is nothing but a fragile and false concept. Such clinging to concepts such as that is petty and illogical. Besides, it has a citation. I've done my research on this, this is objectively true — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lily1155 (talkcontribs) 04:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

RFC/N discussion of the username "NotAnOmbudsman"[edit]

Information.svg A request for comment has been filed concerning the username of NotAnOmbudsman (talk · contribs). You are invited to comment on the discussion here. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 01:27, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

My RfA[edit]

Homemade chocolate chip cookies, fresh out of the oven, November 2009.jpg
Pavlov's RfA reward

Thank for !voting at my recent RfA. You voted Support so you get a whopping three cookies, fresh from the oven!
All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 19:08, 16 July 2015 (UTC).

A trophy for you![edit]

Trophy.png The One-Month Cup
Exactly one month ago, you welcomed me to Wikipedia. I thank you for this, as now my editing skills have greatly increased, and I have found my place within the community of contributors. Just thought I'd show my appreciation! The best, Coderenius (talk) 17:35, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
@Coderenius: Gosh, thanks! This just made my day. I see you also got your first DYK, so congratulations! Keep up the good work, and if you have any article work you want me to look at, please, call me over. Altamel (talk) 17:45, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
@Altamel: I will be sure to if I ever have the need, thank you! Coderenius (talk) 17:51, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

(Misplaced message, July 23)[edit]

I'm new at this but I have some information for the Mel Gibson page for u. I heard all this straight from my Gramma, who was friends with him when he lived on the Beartooth and heard this from him she even bought his Suburban when he went off to film Braveheart. He wasn't looking forwardto filming that movie) : [Mel bought (for 2 mil) and lived on the Beartooth Ranch, between Columbus and Big Timber in Montana from the 80's to the 90's. His parents considered Montana to be their home and the Beartooth Ranch was Mel's escape from the stress and politics of Hollywood.]Sconant93 (talk) 15:10, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Mel Gibson page[edit]

Hey I was on the Mel gibson page and ir wouldn't let me edit it and it was locked for vandalism protection and I notice that the top of the page it said you were the last one to edit it so I figured you were able to edit. So maybe then you'd be able to add that information cuz I can't. Sorry I'm new at this I just started today I was hearing this information straight from Grandma and I felt like I should add it. Didnt know how to open discussion Sconant93 (talk) 21:09, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

@Sconant93: Got it. I'm sorry, I got a little flustered and should have posted here instead. Let's keep any future comments on this page, that was my bad for splitting the thread up. Altamel (talk) 21:11, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Lol sounds good

@Sconant93: These two sources [1][2] corroborate some of what your grandmother said. You can use them to file a semi-protected edit request at Talk:Mel Gibson. Follow the instructions here. Altamel (talk) 21:25, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

It is done[edit]

It is done, my friend! As of yesterday, the article on Özdere is fully completed like I said I would when you congratulated me, with images, citations and all, and nominated for DYK. I encourage you to provide feedback and to contribute yourself, I would love to see this article eventually reach WP:GA or WP:FA. Wishing you the best, Coderenius () 17:11, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Great! At a brief glance I'd say the article may need some more sources before GA. It's difficult for me to make a detailed review at this time because my Internet connection is spotty, so I'll have to read through the sources later. I'm also going to make some comments on the GA page. Altamel (talk) 05:38, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

RfD Notice[edit]

I removed the notice from the page because I didn't see the listing at RfD. Where do you see it? Compassionate727 (talk) 17:36, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

@User:Compassionate727: TheChampionMan1234 added it to the discussion "Malaixiya" which was re-listed today, so you can find it WP:RfD. The addition was out-of-process, which probably explains why you couldn't find it. I'm fixing the RfD link now. Altamel (talk) 17:43, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Ah, thanks. Compassionate727 (talk) 17:46, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Another review[edit]

I didn't know if you would be interested in reviewing Sagadahoc Bridge, another page I created. Thanks either way 331dot (talk) 15:16, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

@331dot Yes check.svg Done There are few sentences that follow the original source a bit more closely (see WP:CLOSEPARAPHRASING) than I am comfortable with. I fixed the beginning of the Name and History sections, which I think takes care of the most egregious instances, though you might want to double-check the rest of the article as well. The article does seem notable, so there are no other issues. Good work! Altamel (talk) 15:58, 8 September 2015 (UTC)


The vandals kind of got us on that one! Thanks for your help. Jacona (talk) 16:39, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

@Jacona You are welcome! But you see, if they hadn't overdone it, we might not have noticed the "Principal" mischief they were up to. Altamel (talk) 16:46, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
P.S. It's amazing how long vandalism manages to stay on school articles. If you want a good laugh, check out these edits to Parish Hill High School. For three months, the article stated that the school had been the site of a battle between "pirates of the Red Sea" and Communists. Altamel (talk) 16:46, 10 September 2015 (UTC)


Thank you for your message on my talk page. In regards to the article you mentioned I tagged it with G1 as it was a wall of uncyclopedic text, incomprehensible in its form at then, with little value for Wikipedia. In hindsight, I could have tagged it wit G12 as well/instead, and I will try to be more careful in the future :) Kebabpizza (talk) 10:04, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

I think you gave the wrong warning[edit]

See mine. Krett12 (talk) 15:37, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

@Krett12 Hmm, I should been more careful with the revert edit summary. When I see an edit that inserts information that doesn't seem true my custom is to revert and mark it "unsourced", as an assumption of good faith, in case it was true. However, it is obvious that nobody is "king of the world", so I probably should have used a more precise edit summary. These were typical juvenile test edits, going around calling oneself "king of the world"— but labeling those edits "deliberate factual errors" seemed a bit harsh. When I went to place the user warning, I realized that the text of {{uw-unsourced1}} says "if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so", which would be bad advice for this instance, since there is no way to source a false statement! Upon reflection, I would have used an edit summary like "probably not true" and left {{uw-error1}} on their user talk instead. By the way, are you new to vandalism patrol? Altamel (talk) 15:49, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
I am not "new", people just patronize me for no reason. Krett12 (talk) 23:43, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 29 October[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 30 October 2015 (UTC)


Thanks for taking care of my COI-encumbered edit request. I appreciate it. Ron Schnell 03:08, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Emeco 1006[edit]

If you have a minute. I think the edits were supported in the prior discussion a few weeks ago, but nobody went ahead and made the edits. David King, Ethical Wiki (Talk) 19:40, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

@David King, Ethical Wiki: Yellow check.svg Partly done: check the talk page. Hope that helps. Altamel (talk) 20:13, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. You never have to apologize, btw, for doing something slightly different than whatever I suggested. A bit of pet peeve of mine. The only folks that owe me an apology are the ones that harass and bully me, create drama and ABF.
I've got one more comment here and that should be it for these pages, but the editor I pinged there is new and not online very often, so figure it may take a few weeks for them to respond. I'd like to be patient and wait for them, but thought I would let you know as well. Just as an FYI - this version has links to PDFs of the sources you couldn't access on Dropbox. Thanks again! David King, Ethical Wiki (Talk) 13:36, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Amb. Colleen Bell[edit]

Hi there, Altamel. In September you helped with a small request on the bio for Colleen Bell, the U.S. Ambassador to Hungary. I'm dropping a note here today to see if you might be able to assist me with a content update to a section of the Bell article. (You can find the request here.) As always, I'm happy to receive feedback and discuss further. WWB Too (Talk · COI) 16:46, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

@WWB Too Due to real life obligations, I have been rather stretched for time this past week. I'll take a look if I have the chance. Altamel (talk) 02:28, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
OK, I totally understand. I'll continue to look for another editor who might help, but if you can find the time in the near future, I'd appreciate it! Best, WWB Too (Talk · COI) 18:15, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

re my ACE voter guide & guide to guides[edit]

I chose to separate the guide to guides onto its own page and have the ACE template link to my guide and not my guide to guides. As far as I can tell, this is acceptable, if not I am willing to delete my guide to guides. THEowner of a l l 22:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Yes, that is good enough for me. It might not be enough for others, but judging from Floq's opinion, I doubt anyone else is likely to care. Altamel (talk) 06:52, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings![edit]

Use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Merry Christmas![edit]

Wikipedia Happy New Year.png Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2016!

Hello Altamel, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2016.
Happy editing,
-Liancetalk/contribs 16:18, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

78.26's RFA Appreciation award[edit]

Thank-you-word-cloud.jpg The 78.26 RFA Appreciation award
Thank you for the participation and support at my RFA. It is truly appreciated. I hope to be of further help around here, and if you see me doing something dumb, you know where to find me. Again, I thank you. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 00:02, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Altamel![edit]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year 2016}} to send this message
@Yamaguchi先生 Happy New Year to you too! Altamel (talk) 22:49, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Altamel![edit]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Thank you for supporting my RfA[edit]

Human lightning rod not to scale Brianhe RfA Appreciation award
Thank you for participating at my RfA. Your support was very much appreciated even if I did get a bit scorched. Brianhe (talk) 02:46, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

What's up man?[edit]

You can't touch this StephenFGlansberg (talk) 03:25, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

ANI discussion[edit]

Thanks for the suggestion, which should have been an obvious thing to do. I'm going to have to stop editing Wikipedia after being up all night. I filed an SPI report at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Isla Riordan and another 38 accounts were found. --AussieLegend () 03:50, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

@User:AussieLegend Well, thanks for your hard work staying up all night to defend Wikipedia. I'll keep an eye out for any accounts behaving similarly and add them to the SPI. By the way, how did you find all those accounts? Is there some kind of tool to search for specific URLs in the page history? This might be useful for when I'm patrolling recent changes. Altamel (talk) 03:58, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
I first noticed the changes at a few articles on my watchlist and saw that some were being repeated by different users so I checked each user's edits. That's where I got the different urls. I then used Special:LinkSearch to search for articles linking to the --AussieLegend () 04:14, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Got it, thanks. Apparently the spammers are still at it: I've added another two accounts to the SPI. Altamel (talk) 04:23, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

The spamming has resumed (briefly?). The domains have been blacklisted globally and the accounts in the SPI checked and blocked, however the spam blacklist does not prevent edits like this. Please report any new domains to m:Talk:Spam blacklist. MER-C 13:46, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

(Message, February 29)[edit]

Hi Altamel

Thanks so much for your efforts on my behalf. As you can probably tell, my computer skills are very limited.If possible, it would be much easier if you contacted me by my email address which is:

In answer to your questions about my 2 requests from 2012 and 2016 respectively in relation to my Wiki page

-When I say that I edited the books, what I mean is that I was the person who conceptualized the anthology and chose its contacts, either by myself or with another editor, not simply that I corrected the copy ( though I did that too).

- I am no longer a professor at University of Illinois-Springfield, but I am a professor emeritus there.

Hope that helps!

Ron Sakolsky

˜˜˜˜ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ron Sakolsky (talkcontribs) 02:54, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

You are welcome. Since you are still professor emeritus at UIS I'll leave that in the article. If you have another requests, it is still better to post your proposed edits here on article talk page, so that I am not the only one to see it (I have a rather busy schedule, and there is a chance others may see it before I do). Altamel (talk) 03:55, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

March 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Applied Materials may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • in Santa Clara, CA, in 1974.<ref></ref> Its Santa Clara headquarters was built in 1998, and features a large outdoor sculpture ("

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:30, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Request re: Smile Train[edit]

Hi, Altamel. I was wondering if you had time to revisit my two requests at Talk:Smile Train. I had a question regarding the Miss Universe content, and I also wonder if the "edit request" template in the second request needs to be updated accordingly. Thanks again for your assistance so far. SM at Smile Train (talk) 19:17, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Replied on the article talk page. Altamel (talk) 00:53, 19 March 2016 (UTC)


Hello there Altamel! It's so exciting to notify you again after all this time, first off I'd like to thank you for the wonderful Christmas/New Year's message! Might be a bit late, though. Happy St. Patrick's Day (it's still March 17th in Miami time right now) as well, if you celebrate that! Have you heard the news? The little article I'd been working on since my beginnings as an editor, Dilek Peninsula-Büyük Menderes Delta National Park, is now a good article! Thank you so much for your help in my journey as a contributor to the site, you've really been one of the pioneers of my success here. As a side note, you've already offered your take on the Özdere article on its talk page, but I still welcome you to help in the GAN process, since I intend on nominating it for GA very soon. Cheers, and the best to you! Coderenius () 02:57, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Congratulations, Coderenius! Good luck with your future work. I'll take another look at Özdere when I have the time. My last review was performed while traveling, and having a spotty internet connection didn't help. Altamel (talk) 00:48, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Inkian Jason[edit]

Does this mean you approved all of his proposed edits? If so that's fine and I'll let him know WhisperToMe (talk) 05:21, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Apologies for the ambiguity, and thanks for helping to clear the edit request backlog. I assume that marking an edit request as "answered" means that it has received a response, and as you gave a very thorough evaluation that I completely agree with, I deactivated the edit request template so that it no longer shows up in the backlog and no longer needs the attention of other patrollers. It does not mean I approved every edit, as some are still a bit close to the original wording as you pointed out. I have offered some suggestions on the talk page. Thanks, Altamel (talk) 19:47, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Thank you, both, for your assistance. If either of you is willing to address the removal of Blackstone Group from the infobox, I'd be grateful. According to infobox documentation, the "owner" field should not be used for publicly traded companies. This is a very simple and quick improvement to make, but User:Toohool has declined to update the article because (s)he disagrees with the guideline. Inkian Jason (talk) 22:02, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi Altamel. I was wondering if you might have a moment to implement your proposed compromise mentioned at Talk:Hilton_Worldwide#Re:_Blackstone_Group. Inkian Jason (talk) 16:39, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Commented there. Thanks for bearing with the delay; somehow this got lost in the flood of other edit requests I've been processing. Altamel (talk) 16:57, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
No problem. Thanks for revisiting. I replied to your request (same talk page) regarding a source for the company's 50 million members and still hope to get assistance with the logos discussion. Inkian Jason (talk) 17:55, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

DLA Piper[edit]

An FYI I left you a note over at Talk:DLA Piper. I look forward to your input. Thanks. NinaSpezz (talk) 15:47, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

@NinaSpezz Been a bit busy recently, will take a took as soon as possible. Altamel (talk) 23:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

BNY Mellon[edit]

Hi there! I responded to you over on the BNY Mellon Talk page about "equity" in the infobox. I just wanted to let you know in case you missed the notification. Thanks so much for all of your help! Heatherer (talk) 14:21, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the reminder; I updated the infobox. Altamel (talk) 04:10, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

The Pictet Group[edit]

Hi again, and thanks for taking the time to review the Pictet article. I've listed a few specific edits to comply with what you'd noted (added some citations, removed pretty much any thing that had "top" "premier" or such thing in it; added the NYT article you mentioned, clarified the USDoJ probe and removed the CSR part that had no secondary sources). Let me know if that's what you had in mind (and if this was the proper way to suggest edits). Thanks, Pplc (talk) 10:44, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Applied Materials[edit]

Hi! Heads up that I've replied to your very helpful feedback on my COI requests for Applied Materials, providing additional sources. If you get a moment to take a look, I'd really appreciate your insight. Thank you again for all your help so far! Mary Gaulke (talk) 22:41, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi again. Sorry to pester, but have you been able to take a look at the additional info I provided? If not I can try to surface this with another editor. Thanks! Mary Gaulke (talk) 21:46, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
I did have a look last month, but I felt undecided about the edits. Perhaps it would be a good idea to get a second opinion. Altamel (talk) 21:58, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
OK! Thanks for taking a look. I'll surface this at the COI Noticeboard. Mary Gaulke (talk) 02:19, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Smithfield Foods[edit]

Thank you for responding to my edit request for the Smithfield Foods page. There are several other areas of the page that are outdated or inaccurate and I would be more than happy to work with you on making those edits. I am respectful of Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy and have made no edits to the page myself. Specifically, the governance section is very out of date (ie C. Larry Pope is no longer the CEO). Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeremy Smithfield (talkcontribs) 14:17, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

You are welcome. You can post other requested changes on Talk:Smithfield Foods with the format "after sentence WXYZ, please insert the sentence ABC" or "please remove QQQ and replace it with RRR." I don't always have time to address requested edits. Posting on the article talk page gives other moderators a chance to answer before I can. Be sure to support the requested change with a reliable source. If there is any possibility that the claim you are making is disputable, use a source other than the company's website or press releases. For example, claiming that C. Larry Pope is no longer the CEO is not disputable. Smithfield Foods would have no incentive to misrepresent that fact, and so their website can be trusted. On the other hand, an event such as "an FDA investigation cleared XYZ Inc. of wrongdoing" could be interpreted differently depending on the source, so Wikipedia cannot take XYZ's word for it. Altamel (talk) 18:42, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Thank you. I will do that. (Jeremy Smithfield (talk) 20:41, 25 May 2016 (UTC))

Disambiguation link notification for May 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Pictet Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Disorder (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Tyson Foods Update[edit]

Hi Altamel. Thanks again for the help and guidance you've already provided on the Tyson Foods Wikipedia page. Truly is much appreciated. We engaged in a conversation about the possibility of changing the website in the infobox from to Since we last spoke, the website has been updated, so I was hoping we could revisit updating the infobox's website link to Since we engaged in conversation directly, I thought I would reach out to you on the topic, but happy to reopen a COI on the Talk Page if that makes more sense. Thanks as always! Rgoodman85 (talk) 15:17, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Altamel. You have new messages at Tazerdadog's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Tazerdadog (talk) 07:28, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

New Panvel[edit]

Was about to self-revert. But lost internet. Thanks for doing it. Face-smile.svg §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:38, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

@Dharmadhyaksha: You're welcome. Thanks for helping cleanup the metro pages. Altamel (talk) 04:40, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Page "review" of Klamath Falls Carnegie Library[edit]

Yeah about that I merely meant to tag the article for the fact that it had an unreliable source (Facebook- which I didn't check for copyvio). Unfortunately, my installation of Twinkle automatically marks any page that I tag as reviewed. Feinoha Talk 04:09, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Balsamiq Page[edit]

Hi Altamel, I've added a reply to your comment here: Thank you! --(Giulietteb t)(COI) 14:58, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

August 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello Altamel. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1) and/or content (CSD A3) moments after they are created. It is also suggested that pages that might meet CSD A7 criteria not be tagged for deletion immediately after they are created. It's usually best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. KGirlTrucker81 talk what I'm been doing 01:46, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

KGirlTrucker81 Very well then, I'll wait longer next time. Altamel (talk) 01:48, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
You mistakenly bitten newbies by tagging in a short time, but next time be patient with the newbies. KGirlTrucker81 talk what I'm been doing 01:53, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
KGirlTrucker81, I left the user a message in response to the question they asked on the article [3]. They were clearly using the article to ask a question, and most new page patrollers I've seen never even bother to answer those inquiries. That hardly seems like being impatient to me. Granted, I should have waited longer before tagging, but please believe me when I say this is the first time I have been this hasty, as this case seemed so clear cut. I can't count all the times I've refreshed and refreshed on a new page waiting for the clock to hit ten minutes, only for another new page patroller to CSD the page first. Altamel (talk) 02:01, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Yeah, no problem with it. I suggest you to rewiew new pages older ten mintues. KGirlTrucker81 talk what I'm been doing 02:06, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
Thank you Altamer, I would like to talk with someone on skype, to undestand as well the usual mode of wiki. Stretch Grass (talk) 21:18, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
@Stretch Grass I'm afraid I can't talk to you on Skype, but if you have any questions I will be more than happy to answer them here. Altamel (talk) 21:19, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

The mark of a seasoned Wikipedian is that they have crashed their browser by trying to research too many sources at once.[edit]

If there's a suitable quotes file, that should go in it - David Gerard (talk) 23:25, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

It could make a good userbox, along the lines of edit count/articles created. "This user has crashed Chrome X times from performing Wikipedia research." Altamel (talk) 02:03, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Balsamiq, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ISV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 28 August 2016 (UTC)


Thanks for your help with The Lemonade War! Λυδαcιτγ 00:05, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

No problem! Glad to save an article. Altamel (talk) 00:57, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
+1, glad to have been proven wrong about it :-) - David Gerard (talk) 01:17, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Verizon Fios "History"[edit]

Hi, Altamel. I was wondering if you can take another look at my draft for the Verizon Fios History section we discussed recently. You'll recall that you reviewed the draft and took issue with two parts in particular. I have revised those in my draft, and I hope you think it's better suited for incorporation into the article. You can see my last note to you from August 22 here. I'm also going to post a note to a relevant WikiProject to see if others can look at this too, to get more feedback here. Thank you again for your time with this. VZBob (talk) 12:22, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Quantum Corporation[edit]

Hi, Altamel. I noticed you made some updates to the Quantum Corporation page earlier today to help remove some of the promotional writing. On their talk page, I submitted several requests for edits as a result of a COI and I was wondering if you'd have the time to help review and make any of the requested edits you feel are appropriate and abide by Wikipedia's guidelines. The majority of the updates are correcting some misinformation as well as updating the article to include some more current information on Quantum and their products. Sources are included, as well. If you have any questions about or issues with any of the requested edits, please let me know so I can help answer or address the issue. If you have the time and are able to help, it would be greatly appreciated! Thanks in advance. JessicaWinski (talk) 18:20, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I did see the edit requests, as they are what drew my attention to the article's precarious state. I will try to address your edit requests, but only after cleaning up the article first. Unfortunately, you may find that the article has been drastically trimmed once I'm through with it, as I have not been able to verify most of the existing text with reliable sources. Too much of the article as it stands is sourced only to press releases. Altamel (talk) 18:34, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Thank you so much! I'll double check the sources I provided for my requested edits, some may be press releases but I will see if I can find additional sources to help limit the amount of research you have to do on your end. Again, please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks!JessicaWinski (talk) 18:42, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Horace Jayne House[edit]

Thanks for the ping. If you're interested in the house, the Philadelphia Museum of Art has posted its 1973 catalogue of Furness buildings. I added links to the PMA text and photos to the article's footnotes. == Best, BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 23:34, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 15 September[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Suggestions to complete C&K Page[edit]

Thank you for reviewing the C&K Market page. I made several changes to better comply with Wikipedia standards. This is my first time doing this so I wanted to be sure you saw the changes I made. I understand once it has been approved by an editor I can publish it to the page. Thank you LindseyFerguson (talk) 00:42, 21 September 2016 (UTC)Lindsey Ferguson

I'll take another look when I get the time. Thank you for complying with the conflict of interest editing guidelines. I am a bit skeptical of the awards section: I think I can work a mention of the cell phones program in, but I'm not convinced that the Healthiest Employers award is significant since companies nominate themselves for it and must pay to attend the awards ceremony. The changes you made are good, but the tone of the article still doesn't feel as dispassionate as the average Wikipedia article. Altamel (talk) 00:53, 21 September 2016 (UTC)