User talk:AmaryllisGardener

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

I am a brand new Wikipedia user - my fist article considered for deletion?[edit]

Thank You very much for all the remarks and interesting points. I am a brand new Wikipedia editor and I am surprised by the very quick and professional reaction and comments. The article is in the process of creation / inputting based at my professional research. I hope my article will defend by himself because of his scientific professionalism , his innovation, contribution and by his new concept of the subject in the field of Economical Geography. I believe it will be removed soon from this “Articles for deletion”: category. Re: “Steve is the man” – thank You for Your remark . This is my original professional research based on the current researches from reliable sources in the field economical geography so your argument that is WP:OR is not good. Re: “Clarityfiend” – thank you for your remark. I already improved a lot this article from your last talk entry and now is much mor tidy and not so messy it seems to be at the beginning. Re “Sawn in Montreal” thanks for your comment. You answered already to “KAP03” remark. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mariusok (talkcontribs) 14:15, 29 March 2017 (UTC)


ikat saree[edit]

i have added 'Pasapalli Ikat' in types of ikat section. and also provide citation.

and i have reviewed whole page and there is 404 page link of first link (http://www.washington.edu/burkemuseum/satextiles/indoindex.html) on 'external links' section. i suggest it is a good resource of history and everything about ikat saree on https://www.saree.com/about-ikkat-sarees

please have look on this and provide me your feedback. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raghuvirrathod (talkcontribs) 07:13, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Asilah[edit]

Sorry, but one of the references you added is a self-published work of fiction ("AuthorHouse"). Thanks, Drmies (talk) 14:42, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

@Drmies: Thanks for catching that. I'll watch out for those in the future. --AmaryllisGardener talk 16:47, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Simon Mark Smith[edit]

Hi, I have recently added an autobiographical entry which has been proposed for deletion, are there any suggestions you could make that might avoid that happening please! The article is titled Simon Mark Smith Thank you

SimonSimon1a (talk) 22:52, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

@Simon1a: I must concur with the editor that proposed the deletion of the article. It seems that the subject doesn't meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines, and we also strongly advise against making articles about yourself or a person closely associated with you per WP:COI. --AmaryllisGardener talk 23:00, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2017 July newsletter[edit]

The third round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 288 points being required to qualify for round 4. It was a hotly competitive round with all but four of the contestants exceeding the 106 points that was necessary to proceed to round 4 last year. Coemgenus and Freikorp tied on 288, and both have been allowed to proceed, so round 4 now has one pool of eight competitors and one of nine.

Round 3 saw the achievement of a 26-topic Featured topic by MPJ-DK as well as 5 featured lists and 13 featured articles. PanagiotisZois and SounderBruce achieved their first ever featured articles. Carbrera led the GA score with 10, Tachs achieved 17 DYKs and MBlaze Lightning 10 In the news items. There were 167 DYKs, 93 GARs and 82 GAs overall, this last figure being higher than the number of GAs in round 2, when twice as many people were taking part. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.

As we start round 4, we say goodbye to the fifteen or so competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 05:37, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

First article left alone and then proposed for deletion[edit]

Hi there, how do I best respond? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hsypark (talkcontribs) 20:17, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

@Hsypark: Hello. I think the editors that nominated your creation for deletion are right. The article unfortunately fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines. --AmaryllisGardener talk 20:52, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
@AmaryllisGardener: Hi, I have since responded and found more reliable sources. The nominator did not locate all other reliable sources and merely did a google news search.