User talk:Amberrock

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This is Amberrock's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to Amberrock.
  • User talk:Amberrock
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14

talkeetna taxi[edit]

hi, you removed the contribution i put up on talkeetna taxi because it was promotional, but the paragraph above has an almost exactly the same promotion (Talkeetna Air Taxi). What was it about my contribution that was different than that? There is specific promotions for air and train travel, but none for shuttle service or taxi service. It is useful information. How about if I list other companies, as well? Or say "as well as other servicers"?


dan — Preceding unsigned comment added by M0wyw0wy (talkcontribs) 00:13, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi Dan, rest assured: just because I removed your edit, it doesn't mean that I automatically agree with anything that was already on that page. Feel free to rework that entire section on taxi traveling in Talkeetna, Alaska. Things to keep in mind with regards to this subject: make sure you only mention companies by name which are notable. The best way to establish that is by adding citations to independent third party sources that verify the authenticity of the claim and justify its addition to the article. WP:V and WP:SOAP are some relevant links with regards to this subject matter. I hope that helps!—♦♦ AMBER(ЯʘCK) 00:25, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Mary Rose McGee[edit]


What is your basis for removing images from the Mary Rose McGee wikipedia page? You seem to indicate that there is a copyright issue, but these items are from her (my grandmother's) personal archives and not subject to copyright protections. I am particularly perplexed about your removal of public campaign literature. Can you please explain or stop removing the pictures? Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 00:45, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

As indicated on your talk page, those images had very little information with regards to their source. Please update the file descriptions, which - according to the description you list here - should render them eligible for use on Wikipedia.—♦♦ AMBER(ЯʘCK) 00:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)


You claim you try to be neutral, and then promote an obvious leftist agenda. I'm actually the one promoting neutrality by removing something that only a vast minority of the world's population supports. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheGoodGoy (talkcontribs) 01:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

This is not the place for political soapboxing. GABHello! 01:16, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
@TheGoodGoy: All I can say is that you severely misinterpret my politics, but I'm not willing to discuss them here. Whether or not a "vast minority" supports something is really irrelevant when it comes to building an encyclopedia. It's all about having a neutral point of view and verifiability. Whether that offends people is really besides the point.—♦♦ AMBER(ЯʘCK) 12:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)