User talk:AnThRaX Ru~enwiki
Welcome[edit]
|
Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Gallbladder rupture) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- Levine2112 discuss 02:53, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Nice bit of surgery on the article - it looks a wholel lot better now. Good job! - Alison ☺ 14:34, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Stress ulcer article[edit]
At a guess, you might have the raw signature box ticked without a custom signature. It's in your preferences. Or you might be using the tildes with spaces, or something. Probably the raw sig option. Glad the reference info was helpful. Regards, Adrian M. H. 19:40, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
?[edit]
I do not regret for my contribution in http://www.wikipedia.com (I have spent my precious hours, days, weeks, months). I am proud to share my professional knowledge with wikipedia. I sincerely respect motto of wikipedia.
But the dark side is... Some guy has made a special site from my contribution (exact words and exact styles from wikipedia post). That is also ok, I personally do not feel sad to share my knowledge with others. But at least that special site should have mentioned/sited http://wikipedia.com/wiki/... site address some-where in that site.
And if possible, mentioning author/contributers somewhere in that site would have been a nice compliment and great moral encouragement for we volunteers.
Is this exploitation? Needs re-thinking.
Thanking you:
AnThRaX Ru 23:31, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Cult[edit]
Greetings, AnThRaX Ru!
I notice you've made ten (!) edits to this article today, several of them very large. Looking them over, some appear to be perilously close to original research, at the least. May I humbly and respectfully suggest you add some citations before adding more content? Otherwise, it's entirely likely that someone will revert the lot. I don't have any plans to, but unsourced material on Wikipedia can get savaged pretty quickly.
Thanks for your hard work on this subject. Please don't get me wrong: I have nothing against substantial edits, but it's good to have citations to back them up.
Regards,
*Septegram*Talk*Contributions* 18:17, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Septegram - Thank you![edit]
Thank you for your friendly advice.
I will site resources. But it will take time. Today I have spent too many hours in front of books and Computer Screen, Painful-Eye... too tired to do all these today.
Till tomorrow I will skip all further editing.
Thanking you AnThRaX Ru
Cult[edit]
Respected Septegram, Hi!
I have done per your friendly suggestion. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_as_in_Forensic_Psychiatry from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult, added few sites, edited, corrected mistakes... etc.
I hope, I am learning well.
Thanking you!
AnThRaX Ru
PS: Your comments, advices are gladly welcomed by me.
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 17:11, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
August 2007[edit]
Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Cult (forensic psychiatry). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Cronholm144 20:37, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Cronholm[edit]
Thank you for your suggestion!
I will be more careful!
Thank you!
No problem—Cronholm144 20:59, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Whipple's disease[edit]
Thanks for your edits to Whipple's disease. I'm just dropping a note to let you know that I've temporarily removed the "mnemonic" section. There is no real precedent for using mnemonics, especially where they are not widely used. I have left a note at the discussion page for medicine articles to see what other medical editors think about the subject. You are warmly invited to offer your views there. Thanks. JFW | T@lk 16:15, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi! No mnemonics.
Thank you! AnThRaX Ru (talk)
Old post on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine/Participants[edit]
Hello. You have an old post on this page asking how to add yourself as a participant. I'm about to clear that entry and wanted to give you a head's up. Let me know on my talk page if you're still interested in adding yourself to the active members chart and need an explanation of how to do it. Garvin Talk 23:05, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
DIC[edit]
Sorry we got into an edit conflict on the DIC page. All I did was correct your phrasing very slightly; hope you agree. Let me know if you need any further advice. You seem to be getting your sources right! JFW | T@lk 20:55, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- I'm sorry to say but the DIC page looks a bit messy now. While you have referenced much content, there are numerous red links (probably because you used non-standard terms, e.g. Malignant disease instead of cancer, capitals where none are needed). Furthermore, it is not a good idea to repeat the name of the same textbook fully in separare references. Either you make one reference and keep on calling it (see WP:FN for details) or you use footnotes in the format of "Davidson (1999) pg 1004" with a full reference elsewhere. Both options are reasonable.
- I'll do a bit of mopping up myself but your input would be appreciated. JFW | T@lk 05:29, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed[edit]
Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called AnThRaX Ru. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name AnThRaX Ru~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
21:52, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Renamed[edit]
This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
10:26, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)