User talk:Anaxial

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Anaxial. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Graph database[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Graph database. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Video game content rating system[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Video game content rating system. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Royal free city[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Royal free city. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Inaccuracies on EA-18G page.[edit]


Sorry for the delete but the data on the Whidbey Island "deployment" section is not accurate. Specifically all of the bullets with no citations. There is a small but local group of residents that bought cheap property by an airfield that has existed since 1942 and are now trying to close the airfield by exaggerating claims against the aircraft in order to increase their property values.

Their website is: I believe much of the "data" provided is a political statement by these individuals.

The EA-18G is much safer than previous aircraft stationed here (the EA-6B prowler and A-6 Intruder). The EA-18G has never had a mishap resulting in a crash. Comparing the mishap statistics of teh older F-18 A-D series of aircraft to the F-18EF or EA-18G series is misleading and not accurate, as they are different series of aircraft with different engines and flight control systems.

I just don't want this page to turn into a political grandstand, when it should be purely factual information. If the owner can't cite any of their info it shouldn't be in the page. Also NAS Whidbey is the EA-18G home station, not a deployment as the author would have you believe.

Statements such as "At this rate, 3-4 misshaps over 10 years is expected from the Growlers based at NAS-WI. Since the Growler training is over populated areas, this puts the local population at extreme risk." are complete conjecture and fear mongering, and are not based on facts. The EA-18G has never crashed since its introduction in 2009.

"The EA-18G has a high rate of aircraft misshaps when compared to the rest of the Navy aircraft. The US Navy calculates that its current rate of misshaps is 1.27 mishaps per 100,000 flight hours, averaged from 2002 to 2016." Once again, an EA-18G has never been lost to a crash. This is not remotely accurate, using the entire navy mishap rate to deduce the mishap rate of one series of aircraft is not accurate. This includes helicopters, older jets, and prop planes that have been in service for decades. (and mishap is spelled wrong)

"The EA-18G has a noise signature with elevated low frequencies which are known to cause undesirable physiological responses (elevated blood pressure, increased production of cortisol and adrenaline) and has been linked to increased episodes of depression and anxiety." No factual basis for this statement.

Thank you for your time. (talk) 22:04, 6 December 2016 (UTC)