User talk:Andreas Willow

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome![edit]

Your comments on my contributions are more than welcome. If there is anything you wish to mention to me, this is certainly the right place to do so.

-- Andreas Willow 12:56, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Winter storms[edit]

There is a discussion started by User:Juliancolton at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Meteorology about a proposed/possible new WikiProject called WikiProject Winter storms. Feel free to voice your opinion on the proposal.--JForget 01:35, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

WP:METEO Active members[edit]

User:Juliancolton/Active

Good catch[edit]

Thanks for that, well spotted. Cheers, ~ User:Ameliorate! (with the !) (talk) 09:42, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Another good catch[edit]

Thank you! People who commit serial vandalism under different user names can confuse Bears of Very Little Brains, like myself :-) --Bonadea (talk) 10:27, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Comments needed[edit]

You are receiving this message because you are listed as an active participant in WikiProject Meteorology, WikiProject Severe weather, and/or WikiProject Non-tropical storms. I have made a proposal to start an official assessment page for these three projects, under the WP:METEO banner. Since this would need significant participation to work properly, I'd like input from as many interested parties as possible (even those who may not watch the project pages), so please visit the discussion here and leave your thoughts/opinions. Thanks! -RunningOnBrains 02:38, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Hurricane Andrew[edit]

"This was the conclusion of Tetsuya Theodore Fujita, a University of Chicago meteorologist who devised the Fujita scale for measuring the strength of tornadoes, after he surveyed Andrew's destruction in the Homestead area. " I think the edit was saying that "this was the conclusion of Fujita... after he surveyed the destruction", not that he devised the Fujita scale after surveying the destruction. But yeah, this was a real awkward sentence, since why would we have to say he concluded it after surveying? Surely he wouldn't conclude it without surveying. :) Good catch. --Golbez (talk) 15:12, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Ah, I now see what the sentence was actually supposed to mean... ok, then I just clarified it I suppose. ;) Andreas Willow (talk) 15:15, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
And, come to think of it, perhaps you could source the claim that Fujita was involved? I wouldn't know where to start, but if he did make the claim it is indeed noteworthy. Andreas Willow (talk) 15:21, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Chile Earthquake[edit]

thanks for keeping this updated and deleting the vandalism. HuffPo reporting death toll at 10 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/27/chile-earthquake-83-magni_n_479294.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.229.54.93 (talk) 09:45, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Blocking IP Range[edit]

I appreciate that you are going to block my IP address here.

As an Network Administrator of an Network including a few thousands machines i decided to block the IP range of www.wikipedia.org completly. Have a nice day!

-> http://www.mywikibiz.com/The_Six_Rotten_Pillars_of_Wikipedia

A Page which is baseing of rules like that should not be seen by anyone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.238.137.32 (talk) 16:49, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

FYI[edit]

I happened to bump into you while following fairly random links, but I thought it might be worth mentioning that editors (including IPs) are quite within their right to blank their own talk pages and remove anything and everything they feel like. If they remove vandalism warnings, that's taken as an acknowledgement and understanding of the message. The only thing that can't be removed is a declined unblock request while the block they were appealing is still in place. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:36, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

In fact I put up that warning not because he cleared his own talk page, but because he deleted my comment at Talk:Corexit here. But thanks for your advice anyways. ;) Andreas Willow (talk) 07:34, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Andreas Willow. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Michael Woods (producer) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Woods (producer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Woods (producer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:57, 17 June 2017 (UTC)