See additional sources regarding Musk. Added professional clinic source + documentary on Silicon Valley for video proof. If you need any further feel free to see the available google indexed sources. It is widely accepted which there isn't any reasons for this not to be on Wiki under health and appearance as it is for other famous celebrities. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 19:41, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
- This is scurrilous personal trivia. The sources are not reliable per WP:RS. andy (talk) 20:11, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Are you actually saying a HT surgeon and a video of Musk itself prior to surgery is unreliable info? If that's the case, I don't know what reliable information is. Please illuminate all of us. Trying to get your rationale on record.
- I have already pointed you to the main guideline that applies here, WP:RS. In addition you have presented other people's speculation as fact and presented your own opinions as fact - see WP:OR. You must follow these guidelines. And there's also the issue of including trivia in an article, but let that rest for now. andy (talk) 21:56, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
- "More stupid" is merely an attention grabbing headline that isn't borne out in the body of the article, which is in any case a rewrite of someone else's article. The phrase actually used is "minor cognitive impairment" andy (talk) 22:29, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Addition to Electronic Publishing
I understand that you removed my addition of including Wikipedia as Electronic publishing. On the Surface this is understandable if you take the a restricted view that the publishing results in a final product, however I was intrigued to see that you include Collaborative Software in the new media category. I think this perspective enables on to move away from the restriction and therefore one could/should include Wikipedia. Indeed in the Collaborative Software page there is a mention of a wiki which is the mechanism employed to create Wikipedia I would be interested in your explanation of why you think it should be included Professor Jawed Siddiqi j.i.Siddiqi@shu.ac.uk
I noticed that you removed my addition regarding event mobile apps under Event Management > Technology. Can you please define what you consider to be an Event Management Tool? As an Event Manager myself for the past 5 years, we regularly use mobile event apps as part of our events. Even if you do not consider it to be an event management tool, it is still a technology that is frequently used in event management. Any advice on how to best incorporate it?
I have no clue why you accuse me of disruptive editing. I finally found a solid source on the topic of Fintech => "The Concise Fintech Compendium" and I am being accused of promoting a page by the name of schueffel.biz. I had a closer look at it: there is not even any product or service being promoted there! It's a page of a university professor... And the same source can also be found on ResearchGate.net. So what is it you're accusing me of? There are so many terms and expression on Fintech existing on Fintech which are not being explained on Wikipedia and as a student one can struggle very hard to find. I thought I could help expand Wikipedia share this knowledge with others, but for some reason you're obviously trying to cut me off. Can you please explain me why?