User talk:AnemoneProjectors

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Wellard II[edit]

Did the show ever specifically say that Wellard II died? I know Sonia told Dot that Robbie lost him but that could mean anything. It could mean that Nita divorced him and took Sami and Wellard II or he escaped and they could find him. So do we know that he specifically died? Arjoccolenty (talk) 20:53, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

I don't know, I haven't seen this week's episodes yet. But I saw a tweet about it - see http://www.digitalspy.com/soaps/eastenders/news/a832431/eastenders-fans-surprised-wellard-ii-dies-robbie-jackson-new-dog and http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-4670752/Eastenders-heartbreak-death-Wellard-II-revealed.html for example. Usually "lost" implies a death. — anemoneprojectors 03:12, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Arjoccolenty: I had a thought about this actually - "lost" could mean that Wellard II was taken by Nita, especially considering that Sami isn't back with Robbie. I don't know what the article currently says but probably best to quote Sonia directly rather than try to infer what she meant. — anemoneprojectors 14:56, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
That is true. So we just say he was lost since that is what Sonia said, but off the record, I think that when Nita divorced him and took Sami, she also took Wellard II. Arjoccolenty (talk)

EE Red linkd[edit]

Do we still use redlinks on EastEnders pages? On the List of EastEnders characters (2017), they seem to have been removed. Grangehilllover (talk) 18:13, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

For actors I prefer to have at least one link, even if red, so usually in the infobox. It provides a "what links here" link, so in future years we can use the actor name to see if a character or actor has appeared in previous years. Also, can see what other shows they've been in even if they have no article but are redlinked on other pages, which they often are. — anemoneprojectors 01:49, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
Ah, OK. Thanks for explaining. Grangehilllover (talk) 12:33, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Episode 5276[edit]

Hi, I just promoted your DYK hook to Prep 3. I was wondering about your choice of page name. Shouldn't it be Episode 5276 (EastEnders)? This would also apply to the page name for Episode 4466. Yoninah (talk) 23:45, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks Yoninah. I've sort of wondered that myself as there are other television series with an episode 5276 but none of them have a Wikipedia article so it's not an ambiguous title on Wikipedia. We also have Episode 6188, Episode 6646, Episode 7202 and Episode 4429, all of which are other soap operas. Episode 523 (Neighbours) is disambiguated but there isn't a page at Episode 523, so I think that one should be moved. — anemoneprojectors 14:52, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
I kinda question why I disambiguated Episode 523 (Neighbours), but I guess at the time I thought that it could be likely another notable 523rd episode might exist. Not many shows reach 7202 episodes, so I didn't bother with that one. I have no objection to moving Episode 523 though. - JuneGloom07 Talk 20:19, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Episode 5276[edit]

Updated DYK query.svg On 31 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Episode 5276, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that episode 5276 of the BBC soap opera EastEnders features a transgender character being rejected by his mother? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Episode 5276. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Episode 5276), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex ShihTalk 00:02, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Pretty Baby.... for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pretty Baby.... is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pretty Baby.... until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KMF (talk) 03:10, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Plans[edit]

Do ya have any plans to do articles for the 3 and 2 handers aired in August? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.132.242.26 (talk) 16:44, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

I was planning on the 3-hander but I have been very busy and haven't started a draft yet. I wasn't aware there was a 2-hander. I've only seen up to 1 August at the moment. — anemoneprojectors 18:11, 12 August 2017 (UTC)