User talk:AnemoneProjectors

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Small request...[edit]

Hi AnemoneProjectors! Hope you're well and looking forward to Christmas! If you get 5 minutes, would you be able to move User:Soaper1234/Gaskell to John Gaskell for me please? Thank you, Soaper1234 - talk 22:32, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Did — ᴀnemoneᴘroᴊecтors 22:51, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Thank you! :) Soaper1234 - talk 23:19, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Ooh, I have a small request too! Could you move User:JuneGloom07/Cleo to Cleo McQueen? I started it at the beginning of 2017, so it's only right that it's my last article to hit the mainspace this year. - JuneGloom07 Talk 18:17, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Did too! — ᴀnemoneᴘroᴊecтors 18:32, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Thank you! I'm so glad I finally finished it! - JuneGloom07 Talk 18:35, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Hey, could you move User:JuneGloom07/List of Neighbours characters (1986) to List of Neighbours characters (1986) from this edit [1]? I stopped working on the page after some random IP edited it, and it's since been edited and semi-protected by others. I finished it offline instead. - JuneGloom07 Talk 20:10, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Done! — ᴀnemoneᴘroᴊecтors 20:56, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Hey AnemoneProjectors, I have a small request too! Could you please move User:Hatio93/Jack to Jack Callahan (Neighbours) for me please? Would be greatly appreciated! — Hatio93 Talk 14:52, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

I have done it. — ᴀnemoneᴘroᴊecтors 15:55, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Perfect. Thanks a million! — Hatio93 Talk 15:58, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Question about other relatives parameter[edit]

Hope you don't mind me asking, but is their a specific order other relatives are listed? Is at as they meet, paternal then maternal relatives, age order? Grangehilllover (talk) 17:31, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

@Grangehilllover: There isn't a specific order. I suppose we tend to add new additions to the end of a list as relatives become relevant, and then sometimes people come along and re-order them, like if two siblings are relevant to a distant relative at different times it might make more sense to list them together. The other relatives could be grouped in the order of paternal then maternal or the other way around depending on which is most relevant/notable. Is there any particular reason for asking? — ᴀnemoneᴘroᴊecтors 17:42, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
@AnemoneProjectors: I was just looking around a few pages like the Beales, Fowlers and Jacksons characters and wondering if there's a way they are listed. Thanks. Grangehilllover (talk) 17:55, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
@Grangehilllover: Fair enough, I suppose as long as they're not too mixed up, the general order doesn't matter that much. — ᴀnemoneᴘroᴊecтors 17:58, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Category:Fame Academy participants has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Fame Academy participants, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 14:53, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Moon family, from its old location at User:AnemoneProjectors/Moon family. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:30, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Moon family looks to have merit but appears abandoned - what are your plans for it? Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:33, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

My plans for it are to move it back to my userspace where all my drafts are kept and work on it when I have time with the support of other users who should be aware of it, as is the plan for all my many drafts. Thanks. — ᴀnemoneᴘroᴊecтors 17:25, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
Apologies if that came across a bit rude, I just have always used my userspace for my drafts since before the draftspace existed and prefer to keep them that way. I know draftspace is generally preferred but userspace is still ok, and I'm sure if I used the draftspace I'd more quickly forget about my drafts (I often look at pages with my username as a prefix to remind me of my drafts). Hope this is ok. I have a lot and can't work on them all all the time, especially since I got so busy with work, so although many of them look abandoned, I will deal with them eventually, I promise! Cool to see another anagram user :-) — ᴀnemoneᴘroᴊecтors 17:47, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
No problem! I was following a combination of #6 and #8 of Category:Stale userspace drafts and made the move before checking whose draft it was. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 06:30, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
Ah I see, I never saw that before actually. No harm done I guess. — ᴀnemoneᴘroᴊecтors 08:27, 10 March 2018 (UTC)


If you ever get a moment please could you help on a few file reverts?

The editors upload terrible replacements and do not bother to update the fair use or anything. Thank you if you can help.Rain the 1 23:02, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Hey. I've done Tony, Susan and Sheila because I agree the previous images were better. Sienna's rationale was updated correctly and promo images are generally preferred to screenshots. The original Elly image is only 181px so I think it's actually too small. The current images for Esther and Sally are good promo images with very strong rationales. I will restore the Mandy image because it was replaced by a copyvio on commons but when that was deleted it wasn't replaced with fair use so there is no image in the article currently.
This has happened with a lot of EastEnders images as well but mostly I just let it go because they are good promos with good rationales. — ᴀnemoneᴘroᴊecтors 23:25, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
Okay then thanks for the help. I will find better one then for Elly, as I think it is lazy job. I will admit I presumed they had not been updated. This was only because the Sienna image has "This image is a screenshot of a copyrighted television program..." license.Rain the 1 21:00, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
Yes you're right, I didn't check the licence. People often forget that one. I just change it. I'll do it for the Sienna image now. — ᴀnemoneᴘroᴊecтors 21:18, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
Hey @Raintheone: and Anemone, I think that Shelia's image was right to be revered as the one I provided was inferior looking back on it now. However, I feel that Susan's previous image is inferior, a portion of her head is chopped off. The image is nearly 6 years old now and I also feel that it is outdated. I don't care if my image is restored or if a new one is uploaded but I think something else is needed. As for Elly's image, The reason I uploaded a new one was for the exact reason stated by Anemone, it was only 181px and it appeared a little fuzzy. The replacement I provided was the best I could find out of my 10 screenshots I gathered. I found it difficult to find a good one of her for some unknown reason. I have another good look and have uploaded the best alternative I could find and I reckon it is a big improvement to the last. — Hatio93 Talk 03:32, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
@Hatio93 and Raintheone: The reason I prefer Rain's image of Susan is because her expression looks a bit more neutral but I'd be happy for a different one to replace it. — ᴀnemoneᴘroᴊecтors 08:13, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
If you did find another picture of Susan, would you make sure the character is placed at the center. It looks so bad when people upload efforts with the subject hidden in the corner, looking down and pulling silly faces. Elly has a range of facial expressions and I agree it is difficult to get a good one for her article. I think Susan looks the same as she did 6 years ago. Rain the 1 20:48, 13 March 2018 (UTC)