User talk:AnemoneProjectors

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Less busy-looking table templates[edit]

Dsimic and I have a discussion going regarding the appearance of the table-cell templates {{Dunno}} and {{Unknown}}. I see you've commented there before; could I pester you to weigh in? Thank you! – voidxor (talk | contrib) 01:48, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Wishing on a Star[edit]

Shouldn't this be called List of Wishing on a Star cover versions or split up? I've never come across an article that tries to cover 7 different singles (several of which are clearly non-notable and/or unsourced). It is mightily confusing and I've never come across a similar Wikipedia article before.

I'm also mightily p*ssed off that you reverted all my edits, which were an attempt to make something positive out of the mess. Sionk (talk) 18:20, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Okay, I see now there is similar treatment for You Are Not Alone and Heroes (David Bowie song). But all the same, if a single is clearly independently notable, it should have a separate article shouldn't it? I'm normally the person that goes around trying to zap articles about non-notable music releases ...but in some of these instances (for example relating to X-factor charidee singles) I think the articles should be split. Sionk (talk) 19:03, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Okay, I've seen your reply at Talk:Wishing on a Star too. Sionk (talk) 19:17, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

@Sionk: I was writing up a reply to your first message but my internet connection is pretty bad tonight. I was going to give you a few other examples of the same thing (if I could stay online long enough to find them) but it looks like you already found a few. Maybe Torn (Ednaswap song) (that's a messy article!) or Without You (Badfinger song) are other examples. I don't know of any where it has been accepted that there should be two articles, one for an original and one for a cover, however notable. I'm sorry you feel pissed off, but I'm just trying to follow Wikipedia's guidelines. The article might be a mess, and they might not all be notable covers. Perhaps these versions should be just mentioned in the "other versions" section, instead of given their own sections. I think the talk page of the guideline might be the best place to discuss the splitting of a cover from its original, but I can see it being merged back by editors unaware of any discussion. I shall also see if you've replied on the article's talk page if my internet connection will allow me! –anemoneprojectors– 19:41, 21 June 2015 (UTC)


Please can you move some sandboxes into the mainspace please?Rain the 1 20:15, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Yes, if my internet connection will allow it! What are they? –anemoneprojectors– 20:21, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Great, thanks. I have -
Then I can finish their lead sections once they are moved. I hope your connection holds out.Rain the 1 20:31, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
All done! –anemoneprojectors– 20:53, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Oh great. Thank you!Rain the 1 21:06, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Please would it also be possible for a move on User:Raintheone/Chris to Chris Harrington (Home and Away)?Rain the 1 19:55, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Doneanemoneprojectors– 22:29, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Awesome. I am glad you are back. I have actually been busy editing for a change too!Rain the 1 22:43, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

CS: Carla and Peter // ED: Charity and Declan[edit]

Its been 2 weeks since I last came here so I think its time because I could really need your expertise in this area. On "Coronation Street", has there been any proof at all that Carla and Peter got divorced? Being somebody's ex doesn't necessarily mean that you are divorced (as with Martin and Sonia) but every time I point that out, I get ignored and the edit to show they are still married (but separated) is reverted. Same with Charity and Declan on ED also. No proof that they are divorced even though Declan left town. I could really use some advice on what to do. I've asked several times for a reference but I get nothing. Arjoccolenty (talk) 11:11, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

I don't think it's ever been said that Carla and Peter got divorced. Isn't Peter returning soon? Maybe something will be mentioned then. But no, as far as anyone knows, Peter and Carla are married. I don't watch Emmerdale but if it's never been stated on the show and there's no evidence, then it's editors' assumptions and should be removed. –anemoneprojectors– 11:14, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - Issue 47[edit]

WikiProject Eurovision News.png
Issue 47
At the time of publication the project
statistics were as follows:
Number of articles 6175 144
Unassessed articles 31 31
Good articles 24 3
A-class articles 1 0
Feature articles 3 0
Number of members 100 1

Published by the Eurovision WikiProject

This newsletter was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision 16:24, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Watts family tree[edit]

I took down the Watts family tree for 2 reasons.

1) None of the other articles are gonna ever have family trees on them again.

2) Its incorrect. Carol Hanley is deceased and she and her husband had 3 children. Kristopher and Jonathan, as well as a daughter. And Sharon married Phil. I don't know how to fix it. Arjoccolenty (talk) 19:44, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

I reverted because there's no list of family members. There's someone on here who has all the trees in their userspace in that format, which is normally the person who updates that one. We should keep it until it's replaced with a list, like the others. –anemoneprojectors– 22:11, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Who is this said person? Do you know? Arjoccolenty (talk) 22:19, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
I'm afraid I cannot remember, though their userpages are on my watchlist so when they update, I see that. But it doesn't matter. If we change it to the lists we have on the other pages, the Hanleys won't be included. –anemoneprojectors– 07:38, 1 August 2015 (UTC)