User talk:Anetode/archive 9

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

...sort this out later

panspermia edits (perspective)[edit]

What exactly did you do in the perspective revision, or is that just u notifying people to check it.

I will be adding a few more pictures created by me, i was curious if I take data from tables, create my own tables, and make this an image, is that subject to copyright? Is the jist as long as its not an identical image, it isn't copyright? Whats the story with different images that carry the exact same information. Thanks again.

Anchorwoman: The TV Show[edit]

Hi :)- I was contacting you since you probably know a bit more about wikipedia than I do and I was wondering if you could double check a TV show I just wrote on and added to the site. It is a new addition to Wikipedia, a new FOX TV show called "Anchorwoman". Just here tonight loading information and references, links, etc... Just curious if you could scan through it and make sure I didn't leave any careless mistakes... oh also... when I wiki search the title Anchorwoman: the tv show, it says it doesn't exist yet, but when I place the link into the URL, it appears.. why is that? Here's the direct link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anchorwoman:_The_TV_Show

From one wiki user to another. Would love to hear your thoughts.

sheep changes[edit]

Hi - looks like we were both editing the domestic sheep page at the same time. Whoever vandalized that page did so with several separate edits - is there some way to fix them all at once? Go back to the version berfore they started editing, instead of the last version? Thanks- I'm new at this. Bob Bob98133 13:14, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of Laarge Article[edit]

I noticed today that the article I worked on yesterday, named "Laarge", was deleted. I would like an answer to why it was deleted. I merely contributed to an already existing article, which has been on here for about 3 weeks (last update was May 16 I think). Why was there any need for it to be deleted? Now all the hard work of chronicalling that information has gone to waste.

Please answer ASAP, as I would like to know. I have always trusted wikipedia, but I don't know why this particular article was deleted.

Rered.

User:Ipaat[edit]

I came across your page while looking at User talk:Jay32183 and noticed you are proficient in Russian. Can you maybe try to get through to User:Ipaat wrt his use of nonfree images on his user page? More here: [1]. Thanks! --Butseriouslyfolks 17:43, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Never mind, somebody's taken care of it. Thanks anyway! --Butseriouslyfolks 19:48, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

File:Beatles cropped.jpg deleted without a log entry[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you have access to deleted content, so I hope you can help. The image File:Beatles cropped.jpg appears to have been deleted. It is linked to on many article pages, so was quite an important image. However, I do not know why it has been deleted. [2] does not bring any log entry up, so it appears to have been deleted for no reason. I'm wondering whether this might therefore be a mistake? Many thanks, Madder 14:01, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

On a followup, since I'm using popups, I noticed that the image does seem to still exist, despite Wikipedia saying it doesn't: [3] - maybe this is a bug?! Many thanks, Madder 14:04, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the informative reply. The image if in the public domain would make a very strong contribution to Beatles-related articles. Is there any way of finding out whether or not the copyright on the image has expired? Madder 14:20, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Do you think Corbis might be willing to give Wikipedia the right to show the photo? How would one go about doing this? ie. informing them which photo we meant? Madder 14:32, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Olliver Kirby[edit]

Can you please explain your deletion of the page for Olliver Kirby. Did you read the talk page before you came along and ignorantly deleted a site for little to no reason? As a fan, I feel outraged not only that their isn't a site, but that there is a deletion of the article without even an explination of the decision. May I remind you that Wikipedia is a democracy, and the deletion of the article is relied on the public's opinon not your own personal opinion. Awsometrex 04:35, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Then is their any way to get it back at least to my user page to edit it an try to upload it later. If you read the talk page you would have known that the site was nowhere near completion, with a message for a wanting of exented time to complete the articleAwsometrex 15:14, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Image talk:Riya Calendar.jpg‎[edit]

Sorry to bother you earlier with kind of request for WP:3O. Can you take a look at the debate going on there? I have improved one of the articles that display the image, and the argument, too. But, I guess I am running out of time there. Thanks for the attention you have given me already. Cheers. Aditya Kabir 06:11, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Calvin Johnson (musician)[edit]

not to bother you, but how exactly am i vandalizing wikipages? if anything, i'm reverting vandalism by removing an image which you know impedes the neutrality of the article and potentially violates the subject's "personality rights". as i said before to someone else, it's like a paparazzi photo of someone while they're popping a zit or wiping their bum - of course, it's still them, but if someone posted a photo of britney spears shaving her head or paris hilton crying in th squadcar, how fast do you think it would get deleted? i'm not disputing the replaceability of the image i posted; i'm simply stating the obvious: the current image unfairly prevents any reader from ever even thinking about taking the article seriously or at least neutrally, and i'm sure you'd agree with that point, whatever you may think of me and however annoying this may be for you - why doesn't that violate npov? again, i'm not disputing the replaceability of the image i posted, i'm simply requesting a better one, and i thought i provided a reasonable alternative as a very fair-use publicity photo - something that's on virtually every other artist page on wikipedia as you may be aware.

User:71.229.11.82[edit]

You can't block an IP indef, can you? I think 6 months is one of the maximum blocks for SchoolIPs. Or is this an open proxy? --Evilclown93(talk) 11:47, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

It's not a big deal, really. I would have corrected if I could, though. Evilclown93(talk) 11:53, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

That possible disruptor is back[edit]

Only this time they are using they're not logging in. here they uploaded that same image again, and look at their contribs shows they edit the same articles as User: Hubier (Hub's contribs). Look at Hub's contribs shows he hasn't stopped uploading unsourced, no fair use rationale images either.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 21:33, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

User:Awsometrex[edit]

What is up between you two? He says you are "taking shit about me" on my comments page. Personally, no hard fellings, my sites sucked. They had no links and not any sources. Somehow, is it possible to delete users? all his contrib is about whining that you took my stuff, and that I should complain that you took my stuff. He is emailing me like rabid chiwawa every five minutes. Now 'thats' in criteria for a speedy deletion. Wikimindless 04:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Hello, Anetode[edit]

  • You tagged the supercouple article with needing additional sources. Will you clarify what more you feel that is needed within the article?

It was just reviewd by User:Yamla, and all Yamla mentioned were copy-vio problems that are now taken care of. Flyer22 16:50, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Updated Supercouple article[edit]

Anetode, I updated the first two paragraphs within the supercouple article by re-wording a few things and adding two more references. I couldn't really find anything online calling the term supercouple a neologism, not even on the site with this link...[4]...whether that has to do with the term having been around since the 1980's or what.

As for your other concern of the Associated Content source within the supercouple article referencing back to Wikipedia for the definition of a supercouple, would you rather that I use another source in its place, like this...http://www.suite101. com/article.cfm/soap_opera_criticism/96065/2

I mean, yes, the Associated Content source within the supercouple article references back here at Wikipeda, but that's only for presenting what is considered the definition of a soap opera supercouple, the rest of that Assocatied Content article is great in explaining possibly why/how the soap opera supercouple era faded, and or if a new era of (true) supercouples can begin.

Oh, and by the way, I couldn't directly link you to http://www.suite101. com/article.cfm/soap_opera_criticism/96065/2 because it's black-listed as spam. I'll need help in getting that from being black-listed, if that source is preferable to the Associated Content source on the Rise and fall of the soap opera supercouple. Flyer22 18:07, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

St. Cecilia Society Page[edit]

You deleted the St. Cecilia Society page on May 20th, a friend of mine asked me to look at it because he thought his entry had been deleted because he had done something wrong. Somehow you managed to delete it in such a way that I am unable to find the original article. What happened and how can I find the original work?--Mitamarine 09:16, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Resolved & locked[edit]

I wanted to discourage the editor from continuing his/her debate there -- the "resolved" tag didn't dissuade him, and WP:ANI isn't the appropriate forum for such discussions. But, eh. -- Merope 15:00, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Fix[edit]

Thanks for your fix too much!--OsamaK 18:46, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Make_way_for_ducklings_statue.jpg[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Make_way_for_ducklings_statue.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 11:14, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

Hi Anetode, Thank you for your comments at my RfA. Let me know if I can help you and feel free to let me know if I mess up anywhere. Cheers. Shyamal 03:16, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you 2[edit]

Thanks for reverting my blanked userpage!--Rambutan (talk) 09:45, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

There's another IP at it now. He's on AIV.--Rambutan (talk) 09:48, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for protecting.--Rambutan (talk) 10:44, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

your message[edit]

Thank you for your message. But you want me to send a letter saying what exactly? i really cannot add anything to what i have already said when i was notified that the pix are up for deletion. Jinanez 10:16, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Thank you for your advice. I have sent the email but i dont know what good it will do since i had nothing new to add to what i have already said. Anyway, thanks. Jinanez 13:43, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of Peter Blood[edit]

Page is red linked (Moral Oral and existed at Peter blood which I simply changed to a redirect. on the subject of Notability Peter bloods music was featured on Moral Oral, and the merging of the two articles would not be appropriate. I also failed to place the hangon in quick enough guess--SelfStudyBuddy 23:00, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Fan Fiction vs. Meyer[edit]

I think you might be under the common misconception that fan fiction is only written by children, is only about anime and manga, and is somehow mainly juvenile. Nicholas Meyer's work is absolutely in the middle of the mainstream of adult fan fiction, however. The reason it's more accepted than Joe Little Otter's "Salene" or Greywolf's "Deep Elem Blues" isn't because it "uses themes" but because Doyle's copyright on the characters ran out, so Meyer was able to market his work. (There's a belief among some people that whatever is commercial is by definition superior. Look at those guys who spent $129 on that statue of Mary Kate from Spiderman that was worth $5 - most of them are pretty arrogantly dismissive of fan fiction.)

Many people don't realize that there are a lot of adults, many of whom are published authors, who also write fan fiction in order to explore situations their editors won't accept and to flex their writing muscles. You won't find many new writers, at least female writers, in the past ten years who haven't written fan fiction at one time.

I suppose what I'm trying to say is that judging all fan fiction by bad anime fanfic is like judging romance by referring to Barbara Cartland's work or science fiction by The Eye of Argon. There's bad in every genre, but there's also good in every genre. --Charlene 23:49, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:The Sacrament.jpg[edit]

Could you delete this Image for me? I tried to delete it and I was met with Internal errors while trying to do it. It was already set to be deleted anyways because of lacking sources. Thanks! — Moe ε 00:35, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

? I was trying to re-upload a version of the Image with a source and rationale, not delete it. I was conflicted with internal errors trying to upload it, not delete it. I know I'm not an admin :) — Moe ε 00:41, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
No Problem :) — Moe ε 00:44, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of Faceboy[edit]

Hi - I don't know if you noticed, but there's a discussion of your deletion of Faceboy at WP:HD#Faceboy's page deleted. Looking at the deleted article, it looks to me like notability was asserted. Seems like you might want to try to contact the folks involved. -- Rick Block (talk) 05:16, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Yes, in fact as soon as the article was flagged for deletion, several folks familiar with Faceboyz work began trying to fill out the article suffiently to establish the notability of the poet/performer/host, and co-founder of the Art Stars community of artists, poets, comics and performers who are centered around the Lower East Side of NYC. I believe the page was starting to look pretty good at the time that the deletion acutally took place, and more links to articles and content would have been added if deletion wasn't so speedy. Digit LeBoid 15:18, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

If it were flagged STUB would it give enough leeway for others to contribute info before it's deleted again? The scene (Art Stars), several relevant theaters, and many central figures of the scene are all represented and in good standing on wikipedia. It seems incredibly arbitrary that perhaps the most central figure should be repetedly deleted as "not notable"- and by folks who, judging from their articles, are not in any position to judge the notability of underground performance art in New York City.

Image:MKArcGP.jpg[edit]

I have tagged Image:MKArcGP.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 11:54, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Moccasin, Illinois[edit]

Why did you just do a redirect of the village Moccasin to the township of Moccasin? I just had this corrected yesterday when he made a mistake. I am going to revert the redirect. These are two totally different forms of government.--Kranar drogin 12:58, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Bah, you have merged them. Moccasin is a village in Illinois, while Moccasin Township is the township that it is located in. Please change it back to reflect this as they are different places. Thanks.--Kranar drogin 13:01, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
I can see your point about the disamb, but don't think one will be needed here. I am going to clear up the village page someone, add in a geobox, add in a link to the township etc. Most people will search first for the village, and then see a link for the township there to get information about the area around it. If we use this one to create a disamb, we are litterally going to have to create thousands of them just across the United States. Illinois has several hundred of its 1,400-odd townships that have a village or unincorporated community named after the township. So, I don't think this is going to be something that will cause confusion. Not only that, but at the bottom of the page should have been a template for Effingham County that had both the village and the township for the user.--Kranar drogin 16:38, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Yep, it is redlinked. You are sure there wasn't a history on that village, right? I need to make sure before I start tinkering. I will prolly have to do some research. Maybe it wasn't a village, but an unincorporated community. I am looking at it on Google Earth right now, I will prolly have to go to NACo. Thanks though for understanding.--Kranar drogin 16:44, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

I need your help[edit]

Awsometrex's IP isn't my IP address, my adress is 209.212.2.54They have banned my profile because somebody else Awsometrex somehow got me in trouble. I am User:Wikimindless, But they say I have the same address as awsometrex but mine is 209.212.2.54. I ned your help to help this get cleaned up. -Wikimindless 209.212.2.54.

Illinois Confusion[edit]

My apologies about the mess-up last night. I fear I created more of a mess cleaning than I did moving. At any rate, is there a way an editor can revert page moves? I could've sworn there was such a button or link but when I tried to find it it wasn't there. -WarthogDemon 22:18, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:HFB.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:HFB.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:18, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

History ?[edit]

Hi, I just noticed that my user page User:Shyamal has this diff [5] and I cannot see what it is about. Perplexed ! Shyamal 08:22, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of WPARanormal[edit]

I just checked to make sure the logo I uploaded last night to the wikipedia article WPARanormal was tagged right and saw you had deleted the article, I noticed a debate on notability and saw to it that those issues had been corrected, what was the reason for this deletion? Wantmy442 21:48, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of WPARanormal. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Wantmy442 02:59, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of "Michael Madden" Page[edit]

IK am very upset that you deleted this page, without any consideration or correspondence! i worked very hard on this page, and i posted a memo on the dicussion pagte asking the ADMINs to please talk to me before the page was deleted. Could you please at least give me an explanation as to what "Matt Flynn" (a page i worked on) and "Adam Levine" get a page, but Mickey and Jesse do not! I am very upset!!! Please respond!
Crazilazigurl07 talk 02:11, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Thanks for helping me out, and answering my post. but, what do you mean by "spruce it up"? he's part of the group (like matt flynn is) and matt is most known for his role in M5. and, i think that the information provided is good enough to give him is own page. I stated that most of his successes are with M5, and then linked to the M5 wikipedia page. I just wanted to give each memeber their own page. adam is not the only person in the group, and i think its unfair to just give him his own page. But again thanks for the help!!!
    Crazilazigurl07 talk 19:19, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of John Cameron Mitchell pics[edit]

Thanks for your message. i'm new to wiki. i will email Permissions to keep my photos on my page. thanks, jcm

Image_talk:Gudi_flute.jpg[edit]

Took me 3 months, but I found a free picture of that stupid flute. -N 21:31, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mikkimoore2[edit]

I have been advised to let you know about this report at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mikkimoore2. Mikkimoore2 is undoubtedly the latest active incarnation of an abusive sock who is evading blocks, harrassing, and vandalizing. You blocked one of these socks in the past few days. - Crockspot 20:43, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

==Deletion Review Chitra Ramanathan An editor has asked for a deletion review of Chitra Ramanathan. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Mike33 01:32, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:AmstradMegaPC.png[edit]

I have tagged Image:AmstradMegaPC.png as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 10:05, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:HFB.gif)[edit]

Nuvola apps important blue.svg Thanks for uploading Image:HFB.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 22:05, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Decline of PC game sales in the US[edit]

Hey, thanks for putting that article up for AfD, I probably should have myself but was one of the editors who worked on it (a long time ago) to try and pull some information out of the ranting. Anyway, just a quick note to say that. Mallocks 21:18, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of VOX (Customer Experience Solutions)[edit]

The reason given for the page deletion of VOX (Customer Experience Solutions) was:

Blatant advertising. Pages which exclusively promote a company, product, group, service, or person and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic. Note that simply having a company, product, group, service, or person as its subject does not qualify an article for this criterion; an article that is blatant advertising should have inappropriate content as well.

As I've bolded in the reason definition, just because I listed VOX, its company history, its key employees, and the type of business it focuses on should NOT be considered "Blatant advertising" and subject to deletion as a result.

In my defense as well, please review: "IDEO", "Performics", "37 Signals", and really any other company article entry on Wikipedia and tell me how my entry is "blatant advertising" while those are not...

Voxuser 14:38, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Why my page has been deleted[edit]

can you please give me the reasin that wahy the page was deleted Harpreet Singh (carrom player). You must inform me once before doing that....user:hpt_lucky

Hana Brady[edit]

Hello, I just finished the czech version of Hana Brady and I wonder whether it is possible to add a picture of her you created to this version. Is it possible to upload it to Commons so that other language versions can display this image? Kriplozoik 01:22, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

:([edit]

Why you kill my image? :( Dogman the Wise 00:57, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Wow that was complicated :s Dogman the Wise 01:22, 22 July 2007 (UTC)


Harpreet Singh(carrom player)[edit]

THe above said article is about the champ of punjab state carrom association. It was deleted as i copied the same material to another article named amarpreet singh johal as he is also sub junior champ and champ of punjab state. Punjab state carrom association is a sports association of State Punjab it's not a small state. It comes under all india carrom federation and i also have created an article for it buit its under construction. I dont know wat happen suddenly o wikipedia team. I also have create dmany artcils about other carrom players from the state punjab. You have deleted every one saying it notable. But Harpreet Singh and Amarpreet articles are not notable ones they include acheivements. Punjab State Carrom Association is a website and that artcle called punjab state carrom association was ceated by webmaster my freind Harpreet. he is webmasetr of that site which give me previleges to drop articles from his site. If you want written permission from him then i will tell him to do that.

You can also see that the guys who have edited the punjab state carrom association page used "[[]]" sign in every name tahts why i have create dthe articles. Well i am a bit confused man. I want u to tell me if someone have changed my pages. Enjoy life Rabb Rakha.......user:hpt_lucky

Railpage[edit]

Even though I haven't agreed with much of the material in that article, I have refrained from making major edits. Inadvertently, and in good faith, by protecting it in its current state (23rd July), instead of defusing the situation you may have achieved the opposite.Tezza1 14:50, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Admin, see Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Tezza1 for background on this. Tezza is well known for disruptive editing, adding deliberate misinformation to articles and making unilateral reverts of collaborative edits if he disagrees with the content. He has openly stated he does not believe the article should exist and campaigned for its deletion, and having failed twice engaged in disruptive editing to devalue the content. 209.139.208.139 15:34, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Admin, in reply to above post 24 July 2007 [6]Tezza1 12:33, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Jagzthebest[edit]

Discussion[edit]

Anetode is it okay if i delete comments from my discussion page Jagzthebest 16:19, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Editing Titles[edit]

Hi any idea how I can edit the title of an article? Jagzthebest 18:26, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi any idea on article title editing?[edit]

There are several articles which do not have correct titles. Is there any way of editing the titles?Jagzthebest 10:01, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppets[edit]

Anetode is it possible to get rid of the sockpuppet article on me? I find it very upsetting and quite frankly, silly. You know that I dont vandalise and that I have told you on numerous occasions MasterEditor99 and his user names have nothing to do with me. Only MasterJag, which is my temporary login, is mine.

If I continue to contribute greatly, you stated that you would lift all restrictions. Could you also get rid of this article? thanks!!!! Jagzthebest 21:25, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

LETS GIVE IT A MONTH[edit]

Hey thanks!!! Jagzthebest 22:17, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Afd for Muse Live in Wembley[edit]

Hello. You suggested at the Afd for Muse Live in Wembley that the page be turned into a redirect and protected. It's been closed, so, if you think it still should be protected (I don't really understand why), please do so. Happy editing! --Boricuaeddie 01:51, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Great! I'll keep an eye on it, too. Happy editing! --Boricuaeddie 15:27, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Oh, wow[edit]

You have the best userpage I've ever seen. Keegantalk 04:21, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, ˉˉanetode╦╩ 20:42, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:H3artifact.jpg[edit]

I have tagged Image:H3artifact.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Rettetast 20:02, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Unblock plz![edit]

Yeah.......... Could you unblock IP 208.120.123.117. It's my IP. It wasn't vandaliszing. I was using it to edit my userpages so I could avoid increasing the mainspace/edit ratio. If you checek it's contributions, you can see that that the IP has been making edits that actually helped my userpage. RuneWiki777 21:47, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Hm. I'm not sure why I can still edit. I agree using that edit summary was a bad joke. RuneWiki777 21:55, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! RuneWiki777 22:15, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Help!/Bug![edit]

There is a bug that is affecting me! The new messages bar is still there, after I clicked on it like a ba jillion times! I can't get rid of it! THis is no joke! 208.120.123.117 22:28, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Please help! Where do I report bugs?! 208.120.123.117 22:30, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Will it wear off?!208.120.123.117 22:33, 26 July 2007 (UTC)