User talk:Angelgreat

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Contents

File permission problem with File:Costa Diadema 02.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Costa Diadema 02.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:40, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Carnival Destiny refit name.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Carnival Destiny refit name.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:43, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

In Search of the Titanic[edit]

Hello Angelgreat,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, In Search of the Titanic, may be copied from http://wikibin.org/articles/in-search-of-the-titanic.html. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 00:42, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Costa neoRiviera at sea.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Costa neoRiviera at sea.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:30, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Carnival Sunsine Lido Deck.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Carnival Sunsine Lido Deck.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:30, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of In Search of the Titanic[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on In Search of the Titanic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://wikibin.org/articles/in-search-of-the-titanic.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:44, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Carnival fantasy at sea 2.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Carnival fantasy at sea 2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —C.Fred (talk) 03:45, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Costa Allegra[edit]

How do you know that the ships will be scrapped at the same time and how is the fate of another ship relevant to this article? Britmax (talk) 22:43, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Please explain the nature of my mistake. Britmax (talk) 22:49, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Once again you seem to know when the Costa Concordia will be scrapped. Please do share with us the source of your information. Britmax (talk) 21:56, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

When adding information to articles, make sure it's backed up by sources[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm C.Fred. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of Total Drama characters, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 23:14, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:RMS Queen Elizabeth 2 refit.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RMS Queen Elizabeth 2 refit.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. NtheP (talk) 18:33, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm FirstDrop87. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Carnival Fantasy, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. FirstDrop87 (talk) 02:18, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did to Carnival Fantasy, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.FirstDrop87 (talk) 00:05, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Costa Voyager[edit]

Hi there! I reverted your edits again. So, before inserting it again, could you please provide proper reference for the information that the Costa Voyager is to be scrapped. Accordind to Costas CEO the Costa Voyager is for sale, but any intention to scrap this comparatively young ship seems to be extremely unlikely since Costa just spent several million Dollar for maintenance and repair work on her. Furthermore the scrapping information is not backed by the present classification status. And by the way, there is a talk page ;-) Brgds, --SteKrueBe (talk) 22:48, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Rosa Parks, you may be blocked from editing.

Disambiguation link notification for February 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited P&O Cruises Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ocean Dream (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

February 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Ahecht. I noticed that you made a change to an article, P&O Cruises Australia, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 20:20, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Information icon Hello, I'm Ahecht. I noticed that you uploaded a new version of an image, File:Quantum_of_the_Seas_Exterior_from_4-16-2013_keynote.jpg. Please do not upload versions of this picture that are higher resolution than 300px wide. As a non-free image, the lowest resolution that still satisfies the purpose of the image should be used per the guidelines in WP:NFCCP. The stated purpose of the image in the non-free use rational is "This image will provide visual reference for the descriptions of Quantum of the Seas. This image will add significantly to readers' understanding of the layout and design of the ship. Since visual appearance is a major topic in ship design, omission of the rendering would be detrimental to understanding the design of the ship." The 300px wide shows enough detail to provide said visual reference for understanding the layout and design of the ship. Please review WP:NFCCP, especially section 3b, before modifying this image further. Thank you. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 17:32, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited P&O Cruises Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ocean Dream (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Ways to improve Wind Surf (ship)[edit]

Hi, I'm Zekesonxx. Angelgreat, thanks for creating Wind Surf (ship)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Ya need sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Zeke Sonxx (Whine) 00:26, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Carnival Fantasy. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. FirstDrop87 (talk) 01:49, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Stop icon This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at RMS Empress of Britain (1956), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. FirstDrop87 (talk) 02:05, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Carnival fantasy at sea.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Carnival fantasy at sea.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 15:25, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Spirit (rover)[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Fycafterpro. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Spirit (rover), because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. fycafterpro(talk) 01:41, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Spirit (rover) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Eyesnore (pc) 01:45, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

I'm Sorry!

Proposed deletion of SeaDream II[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article SeaDream II has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Jakob (talk) (Please comment on my editor review.) 23:25, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

June 2014[edit]

Please add sources to the information you add to Wikipedia. Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Windstar Cruises. FirstDrop87 (talk) 00:12, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Windstar Cruises, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shipbreaker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Season 5 - Total Drama[edit]

Please take a look at this before you attempt to make any dramatic changes to the articles. I was on your side first, but I had no choice to perform the merge, and now I think both articles being together is better especially since they are both the same season. Giggett (talk) 00:03, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Giggett I'm sorry About what I say earlier and also I now think It's cool Being In two pages. More words Is Right Here.->[1]. Angelgreat 20:28, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014[edit]

Stop Please do not revert pages that were deleted or redirected at AfD. This is inappropriate; if you believe an article that was deleted or redirected at AfD should be restored, please open a case at deletion review. Thank you. - The Bushranger One ping only 09:25, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

August 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to TUI Cruises may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | ''Mein Schiff 6'' ||align="Center"| 2017 ||align="Center" | Meyer Turku Shipyard Oy (currently ''[[Meyer Werft]]'' and ''[[STX Finland]]''|| || || Third Sister to the first newly build

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:30, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MS Allure of the Seas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Falmouth. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Holiday-class cruise ship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Riviera Beach. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

January 2015[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Ahecht. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Magellan (ship), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. It is not enough for information to be "true", it must also be "verifiable". Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 00:02, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did to Magellan (ship), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 22:23, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to MS Bahamas Celebration. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Even if information is "true", you MUST cite a reliable source. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 22:52, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MV Zenith, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cr and Split. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Costa Crociere, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enrico Costa. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MS Amadea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Split. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MS Sovereign, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nassau. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Unexplained date changes[edit]

Hi Angelgreat. I noticed that you've been changing the dates of various maintenance/deletion templates added to file pages like you did here, here, here and here, etc. In a couple of cases, your edits were reverted by Aspects as "unexplained date changes", yet you went back and made the same change. You really shouldn't be changing the dates on these kinds of templates unless there's a good reason for doing so and you should explain why such a change is needed in your edit sums so that other editors at least know why you made the change. Continuing to make such unexplained date changes is going to be seen as disruptive editing and likely lead to a request for an administrator to review the edits and see if a block is warranted. Once again, if you've a good reason for making the date change, then please explain in your edit sum or on the file's talk page; otherwise, they should be left as is. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:01, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

@Marchjuly: I am sorry, I want to save those images, it was sad to see them go bye bye so I changed the dates so I can save them. I am so sorry, I promise to never do it again. Thanks for reading this message.

Angelgreat (talk) 18:27, 5 March 2016 (CST)

No need to apologize to me. It's understandable that you want to save the images, but simply changing the dates on the templates is not the way to go about doing that. If you feel an image should not be removed from an article based upon Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, try discussing it with the editor who removed it on the article's talk page. If you feel an image should not be deleted based upon Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, try discussing it with the editor who added the deletion template to the file or by posting something on the file's talk page. You may even be able to try and use Template:Di-replaceable fair use disputed so that the administrator reviewing the file is aware that you have posted something on the file's talk page. If you have general questions about why an image is not allowed to be used, try asking at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions or Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Lots of images are inappropriately uploaded/used on Wikipedia so there may be nothing that can be done. Some images whose usages were once considered acceptable are no longer considered OK because the way they were being used has changed over time; this happens quite often with non-free images. Sometimes, however, files are tagged for deletion by mistake. Whatever the case may be, there's nothing wrong with asking others for an explanation as to why they feel an image should be deleted/removed. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:33, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Discussion at Template_talk:Subsidiaries_of_Royal_Caribbean_Cruises_Ltd.#Joint_ventures_with_TUI[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Template_talk:Subsidiaries_of_Royal_Caribbean_Cruises_Ltd.#Joint_ventures_with_TUI. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 13:35, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

@Ahecht: Why?

Angelgreat (talk) 9:15, 19 May 2016 (CST)

Wikimedia Commons automatically notifies the last uploader when a file is nominated for deletion. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 13:47, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Angelgreat. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Azamara Club Cruises[edit]

You recently recreated Azamara Club Cruises. This was deleted via a deletion discussion; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azamara Club Cruises. If you wish to recreate the page, you'll have to follow the procedure in WP:UNDEL. --Yamla (talk) 15:36, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

List of proposed state mergers[edit]

Please stop adding invalid entries to the list of proposed state mergers. The lsit is meant for proper proposals by the powers that can enact them, "proposals originating from sovereign states or organizations". Popular feelings, popular sentiments, popular support mean zilch here. Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 10:58, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

@Rui Gabriel Correia: I don't know what you're talking about, I added those, how is that invalid?

Angelgreat (talk) 12:57, 4 November 2017 (CST)

Since when is "The unification of Albania and the partially recognized Kosovo has gained popularity since the 2008 Kosovo declaration of independence." a proposal? Since when is "The unification of Romania and Moldova became a popular concept in the two countries during the dissolution of the Soviet Union, and remains a commonly discussed aspiration for some in both countries." a proposal? And unification is a "concept"? Gaining popularity is not a proposal; being a commonly discussed aspiration is not a proposal. And the proposal must come from sovereign bodies of each political entity involved. Or do you still not know what I am talking about? Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 08:48, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

@Rui Gabriel Correia: I Understand now, I'll stop talking to you. Angelgreat (talk) 9:42, 5 November 2017 (CST)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Angelgreat. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Warning[edit]

Hi Angelgreat. You add invalid cntent to the Proposed State mergers page nce more and I will have you blocked. Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 13:40, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

@Rui Gabriel Correia: It's Once, not nce

Angelgreat (talk) 17:02, 8 December 2017 (CST)

@Rui Gabriel Correia: I'll leave you alone.

Angelgreat (talk) 18:53, 8 December 2017 (CST)

Disambiguation link notification for December 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Living Presidents of the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inauguration of Grover Cleveland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Costa Cruises 02-JAN-2018[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Costa Cruises has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Spintendo ᔦᔭ 07:53, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

@Spintendo: I didn't add copyrighted material, all I did was took the text from the Wikipedia article Angelina Lauro, and shirtened it so it would fit the Costa Cruises page, I didn't add copyrighted material from another website.

Angelgreat (talk) 09:55, 2 January 2018 (CST)

In moving text from one article in Wikipedia to another, the responsibility falls upon you to determine the veracity of the information you are transporting. In this case, had you checked, you would have discovered that the text you added originated on this website and it's copied word for word. That website has a disclaimer which states: © 2017 Cruising the Past. All Rights Reserved. Any copying or reproduction of images or media herein is strictly prohibited. In other words, taking text from one Wikipedia article and copying it onto another Wikipedia article without proper attribution is not acceptable, per WP:COPYWITHIN. Spintendo ᔦᔭ 16:11, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
@Spintendo: You didn't have to remove the quote from Costa Cruises or white out the Angelina Lauro Page, you could have or have someone else rewrote it in a way that doesn't plagiarize anything.

Angelgreat (talk) 12:32, 2 January 2018 (CST)

The policy WP:C is clear: "Never use materials that infringe the copyrights of others. This could create legal liabilities and seriously hurt Wikipedia. If in doubt, write the content yourself, thereby creating a new copyrighted work which can be included in Wikipedia without trouble." You remain free to take their work, place it in your own words, and add it back to the articles at your earliest convenience. Regards, Spintendo ᔦᔭ 20:14, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
@Spintendo: You also didn't check the Orange section of the Angelina Mauro page, It was also copied from that website, so I deleted that. Do your job.

Angelgreat (talk) 14:34, 2 January 2018 (CST)

@Spintendo: I'll leave you alone.

Angelgreat (talk) 15:41, 2 January 2018 (CST)

Super Mario All-Stars[edit]

What is the purpose of the image? To show that Super Mario All-Stars exists on Wii? If so, then there are existing, better images floating out there of the box art. A photograph of the box inside of a store display is a poor choice for an encyclopedia; cropping it isn't going to improve it. Please stop adding the image. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 23:00, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm GauchoDude. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Todd Rogers have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. GauchoDude (talk) 04:54, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 13[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dave Brockie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richmond (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Wind Star (ship)) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Wind Star (ship), Angelgreat!

Wikipedia editor SamHolt6 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Needs more references, but passes review. It is a very unusual -and interesting- ship design in the modern era. Thanks for creating!

To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

SamHolt6 (talk) 02:30, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Azamara Club Cruises[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Azamara Club Cruises, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:49, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Blocked[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Additionally, it looks like you may have been violating WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO. You'll need to address this, too, in your unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 13:00, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

I am leaving Wikipedia for a while[edit]

Since I am blocked from editing Wikipedia, I will no longer be able to edit paged. Therefore, I am leaving Wikipedia for a while starting now in order to prevent a ban and a termination of my Wikipedia account. When I come back, I will no longer do any vandilism to any Wikipedia page, so if you want to talk to me, talk to my email account. Goodbye Wikipedia, I will be back... Angelgreat (talk) 11:11, 31 March 2018 (CST)

I want to be unblocked[edit]

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Angelgreat (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribs deleted contribscreation log change block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

I am sorry for what I done. I only violated the rules because I wanted the Azamara Club Cruises Page Restored. I know the Admins wouldn't restore It, and that the Azamara Pursuit is going to enter service. That's what happene, I only restored Azamara Club Cruises in order to add the Azamara Pursuit. I also didn't violate WP:COI, WP:PAID, WP:PROMO, or WP:CV I try to be honest and write In my own works. Therefore, I should be unblocked because I didn't want to be blocked and I promise I will no longer vandalize any pages ever again.

Decline reason:

I didn't call you a liar, I just asked you to explain a discrepancy. You did not provide anything resembling an explanation, instead you resorted to accusations and screaming in ALL CAPS. I understand this can be disheartening, but given this behavior I can't unblock you. We don't delete accounts on Wikipedia, so you can just stop using this one if you don't want it anymore. Max Semenik (talk) 01:13, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

So you're claiming that you have no conflict of interest in a certain company that your editing was focused around? Why it's so important to you, then? Max Semenik (talk) 21:05, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
@MaxSem: Are you calling me a liar? I didn't add any copyrighted material from another website ever since the Spintendo incident, The added material was already there on the page. I try to be honest and write In my own words, Also I didn't want to be blocked by the Admins, I just wanted The Azamara Club Cruises Page restored in Preparation for Azamara Pursuit. I tried to restore it, but to no avail. GIVE ME BACK MY EDITING RIGHTS OR GIVE ME MY ACCOUNT TERMINATION, I don't want any conflicts. Angelgreat (talk) 19:48, 2 April 2018 (CST)
You violated copyright on 2018-03-30 with your recreation of Azamara Club Cruises without crediting the previous contributors. Note that accounts cannot be deleted, if that's what you mean by "ACCOUNT TERMINATION". --Yamla (talk) 00:55, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
@Yamla: The only reason I coundn't credit previous contributors because the History catalog of Azamara Club Cruises was deleted along with the main page, so I don't know who to credit. Also, why didn't I get a expiration time on my ban? Am I being forced to take a Indefinite wikibreak? I know I screwed up, and I regret it, but what else I can do while I wait to be released from the ban indefinitely? Angelgreat (talk) 21:00, 2 April 2018 (CST)
You claimed you didn't add any copyrighted material after the Spintendo incident. I showed you did. You then came up with an excuse that doesn't remotely explain your earlier falsehood or your copyright violation. I'm disinclined to believe anything else you are telling us. The block is indefinite. You need to convince an admin you understand your numerous violations of copyright, you need to convince an admin we can trust you not to violate copyright again, and you need to convince an admin you don't have a conflict of interest here, and can be trusted to refrain from any further WP:PROMO. This is a high bar to reach. All you've managed to do is convince me you will continue with your inappropriate edits if we ever unblock you. --Yamla (talk) 11:13, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

I still want to be unblocked[edit]

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Angelgreat (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribs deleted contribscreation log change block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

I am sorry for what I done. I only violated the rules because I wanted the Azamara Club Cruises Page Restored. I know the Admins wouldn't restore It, and that the Azamara Pursuit is going to enter service. That's wh to recreated it beforeat happene, I only restored Azamara Club Cruises in order to add the Azamara Pursuit. I also didn't violate WP:COI, WP:PAID, WP:PROMO, or WP:CV I try to be honest and write In my own works. Therefore, I should be unblocked because I didn't want to be blocked and I promise I will no longer vandalize any pages ever again. Also, on my previously request to be unblocked, Max Semenik asked me to explain a discrepancy. You did not provide anything resembling an explanation, instead you resorted to accusations and screaming in ALL CAPS. I understand this can be disheartening, but given this behavior I can't unblock you. We don't delete accounts on Wikipedia, so you can just stop using this one if you don't want it anymore. So I will explain the discrepancy: I wanted to restore the Azamara Club Cruises Page after It got deleted, but my request for undeletion was rejected. So then I recreated the page as a redirect, fairly easy I suppose. Then the MV Adonia of P&O Cruises was being transferred to Azamara Club Cruises as the Azamara Pursuit, Since I knew that the page wouldn't be restored, I decided to secretly recreate the page, The only reason I coundn't credit previous contributors because the History catalog of Azamara Club Cruises was deleted along with the main page, so I don't know who to credit. Sure I could have went to web archive, but the archived history was too off by a few months. I wanted to be unblocked because I didn't want to be blocked just by recreating a page for copyright infringement, I was just restoring the page, and I want to keep this account, I just don't want to have a bad reputation, I won't do anything bad ever again. Angelgreat (talk) 23:58, 2 April 2018 (CST)

Decline reason:

It is somewhat difficult to understand some of what you are trying to say, but from a combination of what you say here and what I have seen in your editing history, the situation seems to be as follows. You knew full well that an article had been deleted as a result of consensus at a discussion, but you thought your personal opinion should outweigh the consensus among the editors who had taken part in the discussion. You requested restoration of the article, and your request was rejected. Rather than accepting that, you requested it again, and, unsurprisingly, the result was the same. Instead of accepting that, you waited for several months, perhaps hoping that would mean that nobody would notice, and recreated the article, in full knowledge that you were doing so in defiance both of consensus in a discussion and of the decisions of two administrators you had asked to overturn that consensus. Again, you refused to accept that consensus was against you, and requested restoration of the article, which was again declined. Even after all that, you were determined that your personal view would over-ride the consensus not only of the editors who had taken part in the original discussion, but also of three different administrators you had tried to persuade to restore the article. You waited several months and then created a redirect. You waited several more months and turned the redirect into a clone of the article. Your waiting months between your actions because you hoped that way your actions would not be noticed, and your creating a redirect was for the same reason. Have I significantly misunderstood what happened? If not, how can you have the nerve to repeatedly say that you "try to be honest"? If that is what you call being honest then how can we ever trust you not to behave in such an underhanded way again? Also, if after the copyright situation has been explained to you so painstakingly, if you still have so little understanding that you can say "I also didn't violate ... or WP:CV" then it is unlikely that you will ever understand it, and therefore unlikely that you can avoid doing the same again. Likewise there's your denial that you have edited promotionally, when anyone who has seen the relevant history can see that you have. No. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:59, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

Again, I still want to be unblocked[edit]

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Angelgreat (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribs deleted contribscreation log change block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

I am sorry for what I done. I only violated the rules because I wanted the Azamara Club Cruises Page Restored. I know the Admins wouldn't restore It, and that the Azamara Pursuit is going to enter service. That's wh to recreated it beforeat happene, I only restored Azamara Club Cruises in order to add the Azamara Pursuit. I also didn't violate WP:COI, WP:PAID, WP:PROMO, or WP:CV I try to be honest and write In my own works. Therefore, I should be unblocked because I didn't want to be blocked and I promise I will no longer vandalize any pages ever again. Also, on my previously request to be unblocked, Max Semenik asked me to explain a discrepancy. You did not provide anything resembling an explanation, instead you resorted to accusations and screaming in ALL CAPS. I understand this can be disheartening, but given this behavior I can't unblock you. We don't delete accounts on Wikipedia, so you can just stop using this one if you don't want it anymore. So I will explain the discrepancy: I wanted to restore the Azamara Club Cruises Page after It got deleted, but my request for undeletion was rejected. So then I recreated the page as a redirect, fairly easy I suppose. Then the MV Adonia of P&O Cruises was being transferred to Azamara Club Cruises as the Azamara Pursuit, Since I knew that the page wouldn't be restored, I decided to secretly recreate the page, The only reason I coundn't credit previous contributors because the History catalog of Azamara Club Cruises was deleted along with the main page, so I don't know who to credit. Sure I could have went to web archive, but the archived history was too off by a few months. I wanted to be unblocked because I didn't want to be blocked just by recreating a page for copyright infringement, I was just restoring the page, and I want to keep this account, I just don't want to have a bad reputation, I won't do anything bad ever again. Now, User:JamesBWatson said that It is somewhat difficult to understand some of what you are trying to say, but from a combination of what you say here and what I have seen in your editing history, the situation seems to be as follows. You knew full well that an article had been deleted as a result of consensus at a discussion, but you thought your personal opinion should outweigh the consensus among the editors who had taken part in the discussion. You requested restoration of the article, and your request was rejected. Rather than accepting that, you requested it again, and, unsurprisingly, the result was the same. Instead of accepting that, you waited for several months, perhaps hoping that would mean that nobody would notice, and recreated the article, in full knowledge that you were doing so in defiance both of consensus in a discussion and of the decisions of two administrators you had asked to overturn that consensus. Again, you refused to accept that consensus was against you, and requested restoration of the article, which was again declined. Even after all that, you were determined that your personal view would over-ride the consensus not only of the editors who had taken part in the original discussion, but also of three different administrators you had tried to persuade to restore the article. You waited several months and then created a redirect. You waited several more months and turned the redirect into a clone of the article. Your waiting months between your actions because you hoped that way your actions would not be noticed, and your creating a redirect was for the same reason. Have I significantly misunderstood what happened? If not, how can you have the nerve to repeatedly say that you "try to be honest"? If that is what you call being honest then how can we ever trust you not to behave in such an underhanded way again? Also, if after the copyright situation has been explained to you so painstakingly, if you still have so little understanding that you can say "I also didn't violate ... or WP:CV" then it is unlikely that you will ever understand it, and therefore unlikely that you can avoid doing the same again. Likewise there's your denial that you have edited promotionally, when anyone who has seen the relevant history can see that you have. No. The editor who uses the pseudonym With the here, I do confess to have edited promotionally, but I'll tell you why my actions wouldn't be noticed. When nobody wanted to restore the Azamara Club Cruises Page, I just recreated it as a redirect, Boom, end of argument of the page a bond I move on... UNTIL It was announced that the Adonia would be transferred to the fleet of the Azamara Club Cruises as the Azamara Pursuit. I knew that the page wouldn't be restored back to the article. So my plan was to restore the page as a article, then add the Azamara Pursuit. But then... I GOT BLOCKED! >:( I am sorry for vandalism of Wikipedia and I promise I will no longer vandalize Wikipedia ever again. P.S. Can I also get an expiration date on my blocking sentence? And don't you dare to block my access to edit my tank page! >:( I promised that I won't do anything bad ever again. "Angelgreat" (talk) 18:43, 3 April 2018 (CST)

Decline reason:

One unblock request at a time, please. See below. Huon (talk) 00:58, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

Again, I still want to be unblocked (Shortened Version)[edit]

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Angelgreat (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribs deleted contribscreation log change block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

I am sorry for what I done. I only violated the rules because I wanted the Azamara Club Cruises Page Restored. I know the Admins wouldn't restore It, and that the Azamara Pursuit is going to enter service. That's wh to recreated it beforeat happene, I only restored Azamara Club Cruises in order to add the Azamara Pursuit. I also confess to have edited promotionally, but I'll tell you why my actions wouldn't be noticed as being promotionally. When nobody wanted to restore the Azamara Club Cruises Page, I just recreated it as a redirect, Boom, end of argument of the page a bond I move on... UNTIL It was announced that the Adonia would be transferred to the fleet of the Azamara Club Cruises as the Azamara Pursuit. I knew that the page wouldn't be restored back to the article. So my plan was to restore the page as a article, then add the Azamara Pursuit. But then... I GOT BLOCKED! >:( I am sorry for vandalism of Wikipedia and I promise I will no longer vandalize Wikipedia ever again. P.S. The only reason I coundn't credit previous contributors because the History catalog of Azamara Club Cruises was deleted along with the main page, so I don't know who to credit. Sure I could have went to web archive, but the archived history was too off by a few months. "Angelgreat" (talk) 20:52, 6 April 2018 (CST)

Decline reason:

As Yamla points out below, you don't seem to have any respect for Wikipedia's policies when they disagree with you. Despite multiple lengthy unblock requests I don't see that the issues that led to this block wouldn't recur if you were unblocked. Huon (talk) 00:58, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

As of this edit, you have explicitly stated at the top of the page that if we don't unblock you and instead, revoke your access to this page, you will violate WP:BLOCK and WP:SOCK by creating a new account. This proves you are acting in bad faith and cannot be trusted. As such, I have revoked talk page access. If you are caught continuing to edit, all of your edits may be thrown away (see WP:DENY). If you refrain from setting up any other accounts, and assuming your current unblock request is denied, you can apply under WP:SO in six months. You will need to use WP:UTRS at that time. In order to be unblocked then, you would need to convince the admin you understand copyright (so far, you've gone out of your way to explain you do not understand copyright), you would need to convince them you would refrain from any further promotional edits (and would likely need to agree to a topic ban around the cruise industry, broadly construed), and would need to explain what on earth possessed you to threaten to break WP:BLOCK and WP:SOCK. If on the other hand, you are caught making any edits at all (on whatever account), you will not be eligible for unblock consideration. --Yamla (talk) 11:33, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Email access revoked. --Yamla (talk) 12:05, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Cross-wiki attacks[edit]

This user has engaged in cross-wiki attacks and harassment and will need to address that if they are ever considered for unblocking. --Yamla (talk) 16:21, 6 June 2018 (UTC) (though it's likely they'll end up globally locked and banned before then) --Yamla (talk) 16:21, 6 June 2018 (UTC)