User talk:Anne Delong

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search



Contents

Nergis Mavalvala[edit]

She is a Pakistani female scientist. This article states she is lesbian. One IP is trying to remove it. I don't know whether it should be mentioned or not. --Captain Spark (talk) 16:28, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Captain Spark. In most cases I don't think a scientist's sexual orientation is needed in a Wikipedia article - after all, we don't mention those who are heterosexual. However, in this case, I think it should be included, because it is part if what she is known for. For example, this newsletter says she received an award from an organization of gay and lesbian scientists, and apparently she gave a speech at their conference, and the Science article says that she speaks about it publicly. (I was surprised, though, to read in Wikipedia that the Science (magazine) went out of business years ago. Maybe that article needs an update.)—Anne Delong (talk) 18:13, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Maya civilization[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Maya civilization. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:9/11 conspiracy theories[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:9/11 conspiracy theories. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Mulholland[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Mulholland. Worldbruce (talk) 00:58, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Consumer Project Consultation[edit]

Hi Anne - I'm working on a project with a couple friends to crowd-source information about consumer brands to allow people to more easily make informed purchases. We're planning to have an administrator community on the site, but haven't worked out exactly how it should function yet. You obviously have significant experience in site administration. I would love to pick your brain for a half an hour or so if you would be willing.Megaryel (talk) 03:55, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Megaryel. I presume that this is not about Wikipedia. I think you have the wrong person. A site like that would need responsive web design, and a sophisticated relational database management system for creating dynamic web pages, and serious data analysis algorithms to process the data you collect and allow prospective purchasers to compare products. Me, I'm a musician and retired librarian. I do manage some web sites, but they are small sites with static pages and don't have any external user components. —Anne Delong (talk) 15:06, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi! yep our team is currently working on all those things. What I'm interested in talking to you about is more the admin experience. So for example a notification regarding an edit or content addition comes in and how you response or defer it, what tools you find most useful as an admin, etc. Megaryel (talk) 17:11, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia library Newspapers.com renewal[edit]

Your free one-year account with Newspapers.com will end on March 5 2016. Newspapers.com has offered to extend existing accounts by another year. If you wish to keep your account until March 5 2017, please add your name to the Account Renewal list here. I'll let Newspapers.com customer support know, and they will extend your subscription. If you don't want to keep your account for another year, you don't have to do anything. Your account will expire unless I hear from you that you want to keep it. HazelAB (talk) 18:24, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Annabelle (doll)[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Annabelle (doll). Legobot (talk) 04:30, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

WIR A+F[edit]

AF Mark 3.jpg
Love Heart KammaRahbek.SVG

Hoping you enjoyed the recently-held in-person Art+Feminism meetup,
we cordially invite you continue your participation by joining the
virtual worldwide online event
hosted by Women in Red.
March 2016 (Women's History Month)

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 19:48, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Maxinquaye[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Maxinquaye. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Psychology of sexual monogamy[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Psychology of sexual monogamy. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mahavira[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mahavira. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sicario (2015 film)[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sicario (2015 film). Legobot (talk) 04:28, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of films considered the best[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of films considered the best. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jennifer Lawrence[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jennifer Lawrence. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Ho Sin Hang[edit]

Hi Anne Delong, thanks for your effort rescuing this long abandoned draft. I've expanded and copyedited it a bit more and nominated the article for DYK, please see the nomination page. Best regards, -Zanhe (talk) 19:17, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Yes, Zanhe, I saw that. There seem to be an endless number of draft articles needing improvement, so I usually stop working on a page as soon as I feel it will pass an AfD nomination. Thanks for taking that one a little further.—Anne Delong (talk) 22:17, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Education of the British Royal Family[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Education of the British Royal Family. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Karen TenEyck, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Triumph of Love (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Editor of the Week : nominations needed![edit]

The Editor of the Week initiative has been recognizing editors since 2013 for their hard work and dedication. Editing Wikipedia can be disheartening and tedious at times; the weekly Editor of the Week award lets its recipients know that their positive behaviour and collaborative spirit is appreciated. The response from the honorees has been enthusiastic and thankful.

The list of nominees is running short, and so new nominations are needed for consideration. Have you come across someone in your editing circle who deserves a pat on the back for improving article prose regularly, making it easier to understand? Or perhaps someone has stepped in to mediate a contentious dispute, and did an excellent job. Do you know someone who hasn't received many accolades and is deserving of greater renown? Is there an editor who does lots of little tasks well, such as cleaning up citations?

Please help us thank editors who display sustained patterns of excellence, working tirelessly in the background out of the spotlight, by submitting your nomination for Editor of the Week today!

Sent on behalf of Buster Seven Talk for the Editor of the Week initiative by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:18, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bitcoin[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bitcoin. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Haier India concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Haier India, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Mass content removal[edit]

I'm sure your edits at Maxinquaye were made in good faith, but I don't agree with your rationale for removing so much, based on claims that the material you removed in some way was "promotional" or "trivial" or fancruft; like what made Tricky want to work with Saunders in the first place, or Tricky's extensive vinyl collection at his home being the source of the samples used on the record... your removal was jarring to say the least. This was also presumptuous; no source explicitly says who ended up buying the album generally. Dan56 (talk) 15:12, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Dan56. Here are my thoughts:

  • Just because something is true doesn't mean it should be in an encyclopedia, which should stick to information that has been written about extensively by journalists. If you can find a professional journalist who has written about Tricky's motivation in working with Saunders (not Tricky or someone close to him in an interview) then it would make the cut.
  • I took out the bit about the albums being spread around the floor as trivial. The sentence didn't say that they were part of his personal collection - which may be relevant if a reference can be found to support that.
  • On your third point, what I wrote is my interpretation of what the sentence I changed meant. The sentence was kind of vague, and I don't think the word "progressive" has a definable meaning when referring to listeners. Maybe you can rewrite that sentence so it is more accurate and yet makes sense. What does "rely on independent promoters" mean - did they subcontract the promotion? to whom? I took "rely on British demographic of progressive, young music buyers rather than American markets" to mean it was marketed in the UK and not in the US during the first few months and bought by young people.

I have opened a section on the talk page of the article, and I am going to put a link to this discussion there, since more interested people will see it.—Anne Delong (talk) 15:57, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Like I said, your edits and rationale were presumptuous; the source citing Tricky's motivation for recording with Saunders is stated by the interviewer, but I dont agree with your perspective anyway, so I dont think it matters whether it was the interviewer or the interviewee, just that it received coverage in a published source. An interview, including quotable material, is third-party coverage, and that's the threshold for inclusion. You seem to be touching on "extensive" coverage, which is relevant in how much weight is given to particular points of view, not whether something can be included altogether. I disagree with your opinion that the other thing about Tricky's vinyl records is trivial. Dan56 (talk) 16:31, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Ho Sin Hang[edit]

Updated DYK query.svg On 29 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ho Sin Hang, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ho Sin Hang conceived the idea of creating the Hang Seng Index as the "Dow Jones Industrial Average of Hong Kong"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ho Sin Hang. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ho Sin Hang), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 03:53, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Indo-Pakistani wars and conflicts[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Indo-Pakistani wars and conflicts. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Happy Belated Adminship!![edit]

Happy Adminship from the Birthday Committee
WikiThanks.png
Wikipedia Administrator.svg

Wishing User:Anne Delong a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!

-- Wseef (talk) 15:10, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Wseef (talk) 15:10, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Frank Auerbach[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Frank Auerbach. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Requesting feedback[edit]

Over at WT:X, I made a comment about whether you as an individual think maybe there could be cases where a draft up for deletion might contain, basically, sufficient reasonable content for possible inclusion elsewhere, maybe at like wikia. I have very little, if any, real history there, but think that, in at least a few cases, the content might be best kept available somewhere. As someone who knows a lot more about drafts than I do, I figure you might be best able to figure out, how, if at all, it might make sense to maybe do something along those lines. John Carter (talk) 17:29, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

I replied on the other page.—Anne Delong (talk) 23:56, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:To Pimp a Butterfly[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:To Pimp a Butterfly. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kira Talent, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Shaw (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Time (Electric Light Orchestra album)[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Time (Electric Light Orchestra album). Legobot (talk) 04:29, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:World Open (snooker)[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:World Open (snooker). Legobot (talk) 04:32, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Honda CR480[edit]

Hello, thanks for moving this to mainspace. I stumbled on it around the same time you rescued it, last year some time I think. I fettled it up some but then got a bit stuck for refs. So again, thanks for taking it on and completing the job. Regards, Eagleash (talk) 16:55, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Eagleash. Glad to help. By the way, I had never heard of the word "fettle", so I looked it up and then wrote this.—Anne Delong (talk) 18:03, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Haha, that's great. It's a term I use quite a lot and I've seen it used a fair amount on Wiki to refer to general 'tidying' efforts. I knew it had some archaic meaning but wasn't sure where it originated. It's a good term for motorcycling too. Vintage bike enthusiasts will likely spend more time fettling their ancient Nortons or Triumphs, than riding them. Eagleash (talk) 19:41, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Help with Vandal[edit]

The Haliwa-Saponi's article and talk page continues to get vandal by user 184.0.130.188 They had a warning on their talk page other day by another user for same thing but it appears the person may be deleting their own talk page or something as the warnings disappear. It appears they are attempting to wipe out the talk page as well. *edit: I noticed theystill have 1 warning but on one of their other talk pages, they have a different ip each time, other ip's they used is , 184.0.128.214, 184.0.134.37, 184.0.134.55

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haliwa-Saponi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.156.112.159 (talk) 13:25, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you, I could not get the source links to work again after the guy had deleted them, could not figure out why they was not clickable after he deleted them. The guy had been deleting the talk page also and the talk page had more sources. But I am glad they are working again now. Here was some other sources if they are needed http://www.indianz.com/News/2011/001309.asp http://www.ncauditor.net/EPSWeb/Reports/Investigative/INV-2011-0363.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.156.112.159 (talk) 18:20, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello, 104.156.112.159. I added the links so that I could check out the contents of the references. I have no opinion as whether the text you like should or shouldn't be in the article. I see that the article has been semi-protected by Widr. I don't believe that the person who was changing the article was a vandal, just someone who disagreed with the content and tried to change it (a "content dispute"}. A vandal is someone who spoils articles for fun or out of meanness. Removing other people's comments on an article talk page, is of course, inappropriate, but sometimes new editors don't know that. Replacing them was the right thing to do. Removing comments on his or her own talk page is perfectly fine though, and shows that they were read. I am also curious as to what you meant about the references being "approved". As far as I know, admins don't approve references, and the only one I see who has edited the article actually reverted the page to the version by the IP you are complaining about. Please don't assume that because I added some detail to the references I was "approving" them. When the protection runs out, please consider using WP:Third opinion or WP:RFC to settle the disagreement.—Anne Delong (talk) 19:39, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

There has been numerous admins discuss the page before, there has been diiscussions on admin pages over the stuff, and there was stuff added to the talk page over that section for awhile. The guy with the 184 ip is from the haliwa group, he even had issues with the news media doing stories over their audits, him and his friends told media that they have no right disclosing their audits or disclosing their school incident (even though this stuff was all government funds paid by tax payers). There has been alot of controversy with their group since 1970's. To date their group has not been approved by the BIA (which over see's these type of groups). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.156.112.159 (talk) 22:27, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

"In Wikipedia, verifiability means that anyone using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. Wikipedia does not publish original research. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it.[1] When reliable sources disagree, present what the various sources say, give each side its due weight, and maintain a neutral point of view." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.156.112.159 (talk) 22:37, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Here is examples showing the guy has been warned numerous times before but always comes back https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:184.0.134.37

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:166.182.80.164

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:166.182.80.164 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.156.112.159 (talk) 22:47, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 31[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Antlered Man, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Classic Rock and The Great Escape (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 31 May[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Manuel Fal Conde[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Manuel Fal Conde. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey[edit]

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

  • Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Duke Ellington[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Duke Ellington. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your contribution on Adam Gubman article[edit]

Face-smile.svg Thank you for the efforts you putted on this article. I could not properly care about it lately, but you made a nice work. Thanks again. --Giovanni Armocida

Hello, Giovanni Armocida. I noticed that article because I was improving an existing page in Draft space about this person. Since there is no need for two pages, I moved my information to the one you created. I am concerned, though, that the page is becoming more like a CV than an encyclopedia article, which should be a summary of a composer's life, not a detailed list of all compositions no matter how minor. I've made a comment to this effect on the article talk page.—Anne Delong (talk) 13:44, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Catfish and the Bottlemen[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Catfish and the Bottlemen. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:President of Brazil[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:President of Brazil. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Father Ted[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Father Ted. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Vandal[edit]

There is a vandal on the Haliwa-Saponi wikipedia page which is now using mobile phones to mess up the page, they have messed with the talk page and the main page, they seem to continue doing this for awhile now using various ips. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.201.56.66 (talk) 23:29, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:2600:1004:B048:69A7:D1BD:9EA8:C8C2:31C6&action=edit&redlink=1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.201.56.66 (talk) 23:30, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:76.6.144.226&action=edit&redlink=1

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (music)[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (music). Legobot (talk) 04:32, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sound of Pop, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brandon Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saskia Tomkins (July 8)[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tseung Kwan O was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Tseung Kwan O (talk) 18:42, 8 July 2016 (UTC)


Teahouse logo
Hello! Anne Delong, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tseung Kwan O (talk) 18:42, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saskia Tomkins has been accepted[edit]

AFC-Logo.svg
Saskia Tomkins, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Tseung Kwan O Let's talk 11:57, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sigma-algebra[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sigma-algebra. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leonard Parker (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Metropolitan Opera House (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Coat of arms[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Coat of arms. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Hit Scene 'plagiarism'[edit]

Did anyone who approve the draft bother to check that it is in fact lifted verbatim from Citizendium? Check the creation histories of both articles: Citizendium versus Wikipedia. This is pretty disgusting behaviour but made worse that none of the admins noticed the original source.Under the WP license you're meant to indicate the source. 86.109.100.80 (talk) 16:11, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Dear 86.109.100.80: I did, in fact check for plagiarism when I declined the original draft. However, the Citizendium unapproved article appears to prevent indexing by Google or Yahoo, so I didn't find the problem. I didn't check Citizendium specifically because I'd never heard of it. Sorry that you find this accidental oversight disgusting, but without using search engines it's nearly impossible to find duplicated text on the net.

As for the other admins, please note that there are more than five million articles and about 1,400 admins; we depend on readers and our regular editors to report problems. Thanks for bringing this one to my attention so that we could add the attribution; please contact me again if you find any more such issues.—Anne Delong (talk) 18:14, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of WWE Intercontinental Champions[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of WWE Intercontinental Champions. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 31 July 2016 (UTC)