User talk:AnonNep

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Grumpy Cat by Gage Skidmore

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
344 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: Start Timeline of major crimes in Australia (talk) 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 2.0 Add sources
342 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Shampoo (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
98 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Beloit College (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
5 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start Freedom of religion in Paraguay (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
527 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA Shale gas (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Add sources
85 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Annus mirabilis (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
17 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Music hall songs (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
74 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Sevenoaks School (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
7 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Sonnet 23 (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
396 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Mercia (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
1,729 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA Namibia (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Expand
1 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start Cottesmore Hunt (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
1,847 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Bigfoot (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Unencyclopaedic
484 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Criminology (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Unencyclopaedic
126 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA European Union Emission Trading Scheme (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Unencyclopaedic
35 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Nut roll (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
205 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Valet (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
56 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: C Microsphere (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
256 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Edward the Elder (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
11 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start David Garrett (politician) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
22 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Edith Margaret Garrud (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
0 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Alfred Rutter Clarke (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
1 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Barbara Buhler Lynes (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
9 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub John Bittrolff (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 2.0 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
6 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Gwenhwyfach (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
10 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Æthelswith (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
33 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Angry Penguins (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
4 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Newington Causeway (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
8 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub The Trial (painting) (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
1 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start The Lady Outlaw (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:16, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (Ralph de Greystoke, 1st Baron Greystoke) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Ralph de Greystoke, 1st Baron Greystoke, AnonNep!

Wikipedia editor Barney the barney barney just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

good.

To reply, leave a comment on Barney the barney barney's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Guy Fawkes Night Australia[edit]

As Pod had deleted part of your edit to Guy Fawkes Night, these sources may be of interest I found them using a Google search of [Guy Fawkes site:au]

The various bans on Fireworks is at state level and introduced for two reasons (as you will see in these sources) a combination of health and safety and the risk of fire in a tinderbox which Australia can be at that time of year.

I will not edit the article myself as I do not think that would be constructive at the moment. BTW Guy Fawkes night is still widely celebrated in NZ with spectacular fireworks in Wellington and Auckland to try to encourage people not to hold their own parties (this may be in part a reaction of the Kiwis to show that they are not Australians as much as for any other reason (such as their climate is less dry)!). I have in the past posted link on the talk page of the article such as:

Also in the archive of the article is a section moved by PoD onto the talk page: (see Talk:Guy Fawkes Night/Archives/3#Global customs). You will find more upto date reliable sources such as the NZ Herald and the NZ Government with a Google search on [Guy Fawkes site:nz] such as government publications:

-- PBS (talk) 11:31, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Thank you, good sources there! Including on NZ. I've left it (challenging PoD edits on my addition) for today as I just don't think they want anything about modern traditions (or much at all from older traditions that isn't from their favoured sources) and PoD's edits are a perfect example of that. I will follow these up (and do appreciate it!) but unless the ridiculous lock on that article ends I can't see the edits lasting long. I'm tending towards expanding 'Bonfire Night' as an alternative. AnonNep (talk) 11:55, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
I fully understand you hesitation. I do not think it a good idea to expand Bonfire night as it ought to be a dab page. The different bonfire traditions have nothing in common, it like having a page that describes the different shops on different streets called "High Street". It was a dab page and I think it needs to be one again. -- PBS (talk) 19:19, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
I can see that reasoning on Bonfire Night. But it is frustrating - unable to add anything much on the traditions and social history on the main page and nowhere else to put them. :/ AnonNep (talk) 04:43, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
(talk page stalker). In an ideal world, Bonfire Night should become a dab page. But we don't live in an ideal world, and until the Guy Fawkes Night article débacle is resolved I think it would be best to improve and expand the Bonfire Night page. Ghmyrtle (talk) 10:40, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Guy Fawkes Night[edit]

AnonNep, please drop the stick. You could argue that PoD's comment was somewhat off-topic, but at least it was about the subject of the article if only tangentially--the eye-rolling comment was not, and that comment was very uncivil. This continued edit warring does nothing for you and your cause. PBS pointed this out to me, for which I thank him. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 13:06, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

  • "You could argue that PoD's comment was somewhat off-topic" Yup. Hat the lot. I tried. Now, it may as well be left to show how selective it was. AnonNep (talk) 13:44, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
    • By "somewhat" I meant "not too much, in my opinion, though one could argue it was chatty" or words to that effect. Thank you for not continuing. Drmies (talk) 15:43, 9 August 2015 (UTC)