User talk:AnonNep

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Grumpy Cat by Gage Skidmore

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
454 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Royal Observatory, Greenwich (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
1,355 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Nuclear Suppliers Group (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
964 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Thomas Wolsey (talk) 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
18 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Gloucester House (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
1,512 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: FA House of Tudor (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
15 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub King's House, Winchester (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Add sources
97 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Pope Pius I (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
97 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Pope Anicetus (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
314 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA Wimbledon, London (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Cleanup
109 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Princess Louise Margaret of Prussia (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
83 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: FA Red House, London (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
337 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Bendigo (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Expand
14,560 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Netherlands (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
733 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Cuba Libre (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
50 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Diving weighting system (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
24 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA Scout Association of Hong Kong (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
1,791 2.0 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Evangelicalism (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
1,341 3.0 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA Soft drink (talk) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Please add more sources Merge
89 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Pope Miltiades (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
79 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Pope Stephen I (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
148 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Pope Anacletus (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Wikify
2 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Aleksei Kulikov (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
2 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Alemungula (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
11 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Amar Asyraf (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 2.0 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Orphan
763 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Black Russian (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
10 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Sussex House (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
28 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Brantridge Park (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
14 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start A New Alice in the Old Wonderland (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
32 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Les Jolies Eaux (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub
51 1.0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Chelsea Manor (talk) 0.0 Please add more content 0.0 Please create proper section headings 0.0 Please add more images 0.0 Please add more wikilinks 0.0 Please add more sources Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:29, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Ralph de Greystoke, 1st Baron Greystoke) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Ralph de Greystoke, 1st Baron Greystoke, AnonNep!

Wikipedia editor Barney the barney barney just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

good.

To reply, leave a comment on Barney the barney barney's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Arbitration enforcement 2 case closed[edit]

You are receiving this message because you are a party or offered a preliminary statement and/or evidence in the Arbitration enforcement 2 case. This is a one-time message.

The Arbitration enforcement 2 arbitration case (t) (ev / t) (w / t) (pd / t) has been closed, and the following remedies have been enacted:

1.1) The Arbitration Committee confirms the sanctions imposed on Eric Corbett as a result of the Interactions at GGTF case, but mandates that all enforcement requests relating to them be filed at arbitration enforcement and be kept open for at least 24 hours.

3) For his breaches of the standards of conduct expected of editors and administrators, Black Kite is admonished.

6) The community is reminded that discretionary sanctions have been authorised for any page relating to or any edit about: (i) the Gender Gap Task Force; (ii) the gender disparity among Wikipedians; and (iii) any process or discussion relating to these topics, all broadly construed.

For the Arbitration Committee, Kharkiv07 (T) 02:41, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Arbitration enforcement 2 case closed

As promised[edit]

I've blocked you until you agree not to restore the harassment on Jimbo's talk page. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:21, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

  • You provided no proof of harassment. You could have locked edits on the page, banned the editor who posted, removed the post so it could not have been reverted by anyone, you could have given edit summary reasons (as BLP deletes etc regularly have). Given that you provided no verifiable justification for your delete under Wikipedia rules I restored. Then you threatened/bullied me whilst once again offering no evidence to support your action. Your section title on this this speaks volumes in that regard. AnonNep (talk) 22:28, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
    • I did block the editor. I did give a reason in the edit summary. I do not need to convince everyone who watchlists Jimbo's talk page before my reverting harassment sticks. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:34, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
      • You don't have to 'convince' everyone in edit summaries but you do need to follow the rules like everyone else. If you had evidence you could have chosen another option (such as deletion that was only viewable to other admins etc). You did not have the evidence so you threatened, bullied &, ultimately, indef banned me instead. AnonNep (talk) 22:56, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
        • It can still be harassment without meeting the strict requirements for revdel, so that option was not available to me. Instead, I removed the harassment, clearly identifying it as harassment, and you still restored it 3 times. You are not indef banned, you're indef blocked, which can be lifted as soon as you agree not to restore the harassment on Jimbo's talk page. --Floquenbeam (talk) 23:05, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
          • Try and argue your way out any way you like but if it was BLP/immediate delete (which I support) you could have done so. You didn't. You left it to an edit summary that said Sweet Fanny Adams. I read the delete & could not reasonably see the reason for it so I restored (not the first time I've done so on Jimbo's Talk Page - previously without issue). Then you went all special snowflake despite still not explaining what was in the edit or why you handled it as you did and, in doing so, threatened me with the same smirk in which you titled this section of my Talk Page. I restored a third time (knowing I could only do so 3 times in 24 hours) and you indefed me. No, I will NEVER give in to your outrageous bullying & threatening behaviour. You should be ashamed of yourself for acting as you have. AnonNep (talk) 23:19, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
            • Fair enough; I think you've acted shamefully here too. If you want another admin to take a look, use the {{unblock}} template. I'm currently checking to see if it meets oversight/revdel criteria (I don't think it does, but it might). If I do revdel or oversight it, you'll no longer be able to restore the harassment, so I'll unblock you if that happens. --Floquenbeam (talk) 23:55, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
              • I'd rather never edit here again than give in to such outrageous 'I'm above it all' admin bulling. And I find it odd that you seem fixated on what you believe, but still cannot prove, is harassment of Jimbo Wales. but seem not only blithely ignorant of what you've done to me, but consider it MY issue to resolve YOUR intimidation & bullying.AnonNep (talk) 00:04, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
                • It wasn't harassment of Jimbo, as I've explained 3 times now, it was harassment of someone else. I've unblocked you because I've gone ahead and revdel'd the version with the username, so you can't revert to that version anymore. I assume you won't restore the username. --Floquenbeam (talk) 00:07, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
                  • So, we're back to where we started then? I did nothing wrong at the time, you stuffed up & I suffered for it (however temporary it may have been). Keep this in mind in future. AnonNep (talk) 00:18, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
                    • Incorrect on pretty much all counts. You did do something wrong, and I didn't "stuff it up". You helped someone harass someone else, refused to stop when informed it was harassment, and now that it is no longer possible, I've unblocked you because blocks are preventative, not punitive. We aren't quite back to where we started, because now there is documentation in your block log that you are willing to help harass someone, so if you do it again, you'll likely be blocked without being allowed to restore harassment 3 times first. --Floquenbeam (talk) 00:39, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
                      • I noticed the block log description. No mention that I was looking at an edit with no clear harassment (that you had to go to extent that you did confirms that - I'm no admin, I can only go on what is obvious). There is no evidence that I'm willing to harass someone. There is evidence of your willingness to intimidate and bully even when you are justifiably wrong. Additionally, your removal of the block - the ONLY ONE ON MY RECORD - has a description as pejorative as the original & the title you gave to this section of my Talk Page. To whit 'version with harassment has been revdel'd, so no longer able to re-add'. It all points at a fault with me you have never established. And, not surprisingly, no mention of your own bloody incompetence from the outset to the end. AnonNep (talk) 00:51, 8 August 2016 (UTC)