This user uses Twinkle to fight vandalism.

User talk:Ansh666

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

This user tries to leave Wikipedia, but finds that they can't do so…

ANI thread on Legacypac[edit]

Ansh666, your comment from 23:44, 5 February 2016 (UTC), I can't figure out who you are responding to. Please repair/tweak the layout/formatting/indentation, and/or add names. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 02:38, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

  • Never mind--that thread is closed. Drmies (talk) 02:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
    • Thanks for pointing that out, even if it didn't matter. It was in response to Corriebertus; I should have put an extra indent in but didn't for whatever reason. Thanks, ansh666 02:44, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
      • Well, I usually pay attention to what you say but, as it happened, that particular proposal wasn't going to go anywhere. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 18:03, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
        • Nice to know! Cheers, ansh666 01:36, 7 February 2016 (UTC)


As I stated on the firearms deletion page, enough is enough. I recommend that every page created by User:Ctway and socks be automatically deleted. It would save us the trouble of doing it one by one.--RAF910 (talk) 06:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

The thing is, it's really a case-by-case decision. I'm not just nominating all of the pages I come across, only the ones I legitimately can't find any reliable source coverage. There are several articles which have been improved by others, several articles which have no sources at all in the article but a cursory google search finds enough for (whereupon I tag as needing more sources instead of filing for deletion), and some which can be redirected to other articles. Besides, there isn't really a precedent or a method to nuke pages by a user when they aren't obvious hoaxes or disruption, especially since there are hundreds spread out over tens of accounts (several of which I found today!). ansh666 06:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Perhaps, your right. However, I have seen blanket deletions before. Also, from what seen, not one of Ctway's edits has ever been a notable firearm. Just, one of a kind guns, dead end prototypes, patent filing, toys or nonexistent guns. Most of his articles are only one or two sentences long have useless references, false references or Wiki mirror refs. Anyway, I got your back.--RAF910 (talk) 06:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Well, I've been redirecting a lot of them to their manufacturers or designers, if they have articles. But, brace yourself, another wave of AfDs is coming! ansh666 08:16, 10 February 2016 (UTC)