This user uses Twinkle to fight vandalism.

User talk:ansh666

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Procedural post[edit]

Deletion review for Makida Moka[edit]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Makida Moka. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.

Sher Kahn Bahadur[edit]

Not sure why you declined the CSD on the above mentioned page -- it was the third recreation of a page that was deleted via AfD and then CSD. Same user, same unreliable sources. Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 23:34, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

  • G4 requires a page to be substantially identical to the version deleted at AfD, but this version has additional information not in the original. I didn't see the previous G4 when I declined, but it shouldn't have been deleted as such. ansh666 23:38, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Michigan (2nd nomination)[edit]

Hiya! Would you please salt David Michigan—and David Michigan (fitness trainer)—which have been repeatedly recreated by promotional accounts? (not watching, please {{ping}} as needed) czar 10:21, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Done, thanks. Not sure how I missed that. ansh666 17:48, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Confusion on declining of SD.[edit]

At Ansar Ghazwat-ul-Hind you declined but there are no significant edits by other editors. All the other edits by other editors are minor and/or cosemetic.

I think this decision was made in error, unless you have a different reasoning? R9tgokunks 04:29, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

I only declined the G5, since the editor wasn't evading a block when it was created four days ago. It doesn't matter that they're blocked now; they weren't under any editing restrictions when they created the article. ansh666 04:34, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
I thought it was declined entirely. I understand now.R9tgokunks 04:42, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Closing WP:ANI?[edit]

Hi. Just wondering if there's some automated tool you use to close ANI discussions, or if you just manually add the atop/abot tags? -- RoySmith (talk) 13:56, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

All manual. ansh666 15:04, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

User talk:RebeccaSaid[edit]

Isn't it against normal practice to delete the user talk page, rather than just blanking and revdel if necessary? It doesn't really feel like a G10 as well. Alex Shih (talk) 09:35, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Given that it was the only edit to that page and it was a link to off-wiki harassment that is currently an ARBCOM case, I thought it would be safer to just get rid of it. ansh666 17:58, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

It's not SVDS Sangh but SDVS Sangh[edit]

Hi, This is regarding the recently moved page of Shri Duradundeeshwara Vidyasamvardhak Sangh. Please rename it properly as SDVS Sangh. Rishi Muni (talk) 14:34, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Done, thanks for letting me know. ansh666 18:05, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

DS violation (or not)[edit]

My reason for the ANI was to find out who should be reported, you cannot launch an AE without that. There are two users (and maybe more) who may be in violation, but someone is. In effect (therefore) the DS are meaningless.Slatersteven (talk) 20:00, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

If multiple people may have violated DS, just report all of them... ansh666 22:22, 22 July 2018 (UTC)