User talk:ApofisTheGreat
March 2017
[edit]
Hello, I'm L3X1. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Unilever have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 14:36, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Lord Magdeline
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Lord Magdeline requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tagishsimon (talk) 00:27, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Gospel of Yashua
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Gospel of Yashua requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
2 sentences amounting to the editor's opinion
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tagishsimon (talk) 00:30, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:ApofisTheGreat
[edit]A tag has been placed on User:ApofisTheGreat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —teb728 t c 01:06, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Not Wikipedia's goals?! How about my writings on Supersymmetry?
Blocked
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:02, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
ApofisTheGreat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
In what way is my wikipedia editing history (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supersymmetry#Origination) and my lineage (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Magdalene) not contributing to the encyclopedia? I exist. I'm not a hoax. https://www.linkedin.com/in/lordmagdalene/ I will continue to speak out about abuses perpetrated against me. I will continue to write about myself and my history too. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/romanov-magdalene-lineage-constantine-n-romanov-magdalene-/?published=t You cannot stop me. Lord Magdalene (talk) 02:04, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Calling people pricks and cocksuckers is a sure sign you aren't here to contribute to an encyclopedia. Request declined. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 02:12, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I didn't call him a prick or a cocksucker until he said what I'm writing is patent non-sense and then deleted my post.
Fuck Wikipedia then. It's clearly A FAKE ENCYCLOPEDIA.
Others will add later. Fuck you both.
And in ANY CASE, since you're all volunteer editors, why the FUCK is wikipedia constantly begging for money with it's giant banner. Hosting is free for a non-profit. What, do you not have enough money!?
ApofisTheGreat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Anachronist (talk), here's Your Mission Lord Magdalene 14:26, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Not an unblock request. Talk page access removed. 331dot (talk) 14:58, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
January 2019
[edit]
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.