User talk:Archivist~enwiki
I'm not sure I agree with you that the boiler is not part of the steam engine. In my view, the 'steam engine' is the whole apparatus including steam generator (otherwise, we're just talking about a set of pistons or a turbine driven by high-pressure gases, which doesn't have to be steam).
--Morven 00:20, 15 Oct 2003 (UTC)
Re boiler I know what you mean but while that is true from a "system perspective" it needs separating because for example in the nuclear power station it is a heat source then a heat exchanger. And it is not physically in the same building in some cases.
That section about condensers reducing efficiency need fixing!
- The steam generator is certainly part of the total steam engine system, whatever it is. And yes, agreed about the condenser -- since normally the point is to INCREASE efficiency. Use of condensers on mobile steam-engine driven vehicles have generally been for water conservation, though, not efficiency -- it's very hard to produce an efficient condenser that's small and light enough, plus the complexity kills.
- --Morven 00:50, 15 Oct 2003 (UTC)
While we agree that the boiler is in the "system" it is not "in" the engine ( except for Hero's) which is what I was changing. It is a popular misconception for example that a steam locomotive is a steam engine where it is really an engine and boiler etc. We see these problems when explaining at the local museum ( Claymills pumping engines www.claymills.org.uk) What the system is has perhaps changed over time. I come from the side where a beam engine is an entity itself. 2.06 am in the UK time I left work!
- There's also the changing meaning of 'engine', which it seems used to have a less specific meaning historically than it now does, being more along the lines of a device that does something.
- I'm more versed with the steam engine in its locomotive form (and to a lesser degree other mobile steam engines, powering cars, ships etc) than the stationary kind, meaning that I'd be interested in seeing what you can bring to those articles!
- --Morven 02:16, 15 Oct 2003 (UTC)
The 6502 clock information comes from the "great microprocessor" article. I have noticed mistakes in it before, so I wouldn't be terribly surprised if this is one too. However the 6502 really is about the same speed as a Z80, so that's a mystery to solve if there's no divider.
Hi, Cliff Edwards was indeed known as "Ukelele Ike"; that was a varient spelling of ukulele common at the time. See Perfect Records for an example of a record spelling it that way. I just wanted to mention why I changed it back. Thanks though, more often than not something like that would be a spelling error on my part, but not that time. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 22:40, 22 Nov 2003 (UTC)
Applause for undertaking publically! Makes my eyeballs bleed, that one does. –Hjr 22:55, 22 Nov 2003 (UTC)
- Well, publically is permitted by Merriam-Webster. --Naddy 15:46, 23 Nov 2003 (UTC)
- I, too, would prefer not changing accepted spellings of words to ones you personally prefer. When editing other people's writing, only completely wrong spellings should be changed. --Delirium 10:28, Dec 4, 2003 (UTC)
Oh, dear. I didn't know Uncle Noah considered it an alternative. However, the Columbia Guide says "Publicly is the usual spelling; publically does occur, but rarely in Edited English", which strikes me as fair. Publically is also deprecated by Garner. –Hjr 15:57, 4 Dec 2003 (UTC)
- I seem to have stirred something here! But if 90% use publicly and the rest don't because their spelling is not so good, it helps humanity to move to the most popular spelling, continuing to use an outdated version does not help. We have a similar situation with centre / center but here it is much clearer that it is a US / British english issue and it depends on the article source. In this particular case 'we' have provided clear guidance on the Wikipedia:List of common misspellings page which I was following and stand by Archivist 20:39, Dec 4, 2003 (UTC)
Oyster and papillote[edit]
avoid eating together would be my advice
.jpg){kind=link}
Oh my goodness, poor man ! My dinner was potato salad, green salad, dry ham (Image:Jambon.jpg), wine, and a special cake we make for the epiphany w:fr:Galette des Rois. Delicious.
okay, now I feel like going for a pepsi glass :-(
File:Clockcock.png listed for deletion[edit]
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Clockcock.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. εω (talk) 01:07, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed[edit]
Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Archivist. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Archivist~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
22:10, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Renamed[edit]
This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
10:36, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Archivist~enwiki. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Archivist~enwiki. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)