User talk:Arjayay

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

E-mails[edit]

You can use "Email this user" in the panel on the left, but I will probably reply on your talk page, or the article talk page, as discussions should be open and on the record.
I have experienced problems with e-mails not being delivered, so please leave me a message on this page if I have not replied within 48 hours.

Hello , thanks a lot for editing my misspelled words. Please lead me to be a perfect Wikipedian. Can u help me how to create articles in right way,how to write,how to be a profession writing. Victoria tnds (talk) 18:12, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Broadcasted[edit]

The Wiktionary definition of Broadcasted states the use is proscribed, so it should not be used. The word also appears on Wikipedia:Lists_of_common_misspellings/B

Broadcasted appears in some dictionaries, but others, e.g. Chambers state "Sorry, no entries for Broadcasted were found".
Broadcast appears in all dictionaries, and should be used as COMMONALITY - "Wikipedia tries to find words that are common to all varieties of English".

An October 2017 search for Broadcast gave over 185,000 uses, compared with a search for Broadcasted which gave just 60.
Of these 60, 15 are redirects to "Broadcast" articles, 16 refer to a Canadian TV award and 5 relate to a 1924 cartoon. The rest are quotations.



To Arjayay[edit]

Well, Hello, sir. I understand what you mean to say. You don't need to protect Madhubala's Wikipedia from vandalism. I will not make anymore edits as I cannot or may not have that idea of making edits that you and other editors do make. I was making edits only in that Wikipedia only to make it larger than those of Meena Kumari and Suraiya. It was just a time pass, Sir. Manually added signature -Special:Contributions/2409:4063:2316:6c05:f532:c5ce:d3a9:c917 02:40, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

List of Gurjars[edit]

Hi, the new editor at List of Gurjars is obviously Tushar Chaudharyy (talk · contribs) with another account. Not sure what to do as I am about to go to bed. They are topic banned so I guess it is an SPI job. - Sitush (talk) 19:57, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi Sitush - thanks for the message. Unfortunately, I had to go the second I made my last post last night (19.57.01) and your first post here was 19.57.13 so I missed it by about 10 seconds. I see you have already made 80 posts this morning, so assume it is now "in hand". - Arjayay (talk) 06:54, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Yes. I intended to update you, sorry. I made a report at SPI - Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tushar Chaudharyy. - Sitush (talk) 06:58, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Oakwood Friends School[edit]

Dear Sir please refrain from editing the Oakwood Friends School page's title of Distinguished Alumni - it is the preferred term rather than notable, it is such a minor difference that I ask you to respect this. Thank you. MattVoorhees15 (talk) 14:40, 21 June 2018 (UTC) MattVoorhees15

I am in full alignment with Wikipedia's rules - while you seem to be quite knowledgeable in a great many subjects, this is not one of them and further request that you cease your unneeded edits on the page. MattVoorhees15 (talk) 14:44, 21 June 2018 (UTC) MattVoorhees15

(edit conflict) MattVoorhees15 - No, it is NOT the "preferred term". As already explained the article comes under Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools/Article guidelines which uses the term "Notable alumni". This is the standard section title which should be used in all our schools articles, to ensure consistency. The term "Notable" has specific meanings on Wikipedia, which is why it is used.
Please try to understand, Oakwood Friends School is Wikipedia's article about the school, NOT the school's article, and what the school wishes to call their alumni is immaterial. If you are asking for "respect" then please "respect" our guidelines - a reinstatement of Distinguished is likely to be changed by any experienced editors who visit the page, as it is not our standard term. - Arjayay (talk) 14:52, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Arjayay (talk) - I think there is a language barrier here as I see you are not from the area. It is not the school's article rather an article about the school. It no where states in the rules that the word Distinguished is not allowed. The page went ten years with it without issue. Myself and another editor who I do not know and who lacks a page, have changed it to distinguished. You say "our standard term" but there is no our as you are independent from Wikipedia as all editors are. You can neither speak for anyone rather than yourself - it is your standard term. An opinion. Please cease your obsession, thank you MattVoorhees15 (talk) 15:08, 21 June 2018 (UTC) MattVoorhees15
You made at least one factual error in your claims about the history of the article. I think what Arjayay is saying is that the school and its representatives do not WP:OWN the article, and their desires have zero weight. Instead, we follow editorial guidelines and other standards that have been discussed and established here on wikipedia. "Distinguished" is a poorly defined and opinion of the school itself (WP:RS failure and WP:BOOSTERISM risk), whereas "notable" is very well defined and neutral by the WP:GNG and related guidelines. DMacks (talk) 15:18, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Please, convert the Wikipedia Article name from Ukrah to Nagarukhra[edit]

Hey Arjayay, please try to understand, Ukrah is not a village, its a Mouja under Nagarukhra - I village Panchayet. You can search in goolge as Nagarukhra, any where in the web doesn't mentioned as Ukrah is a village. Its a Mouja in Nagarukhra with the JL No. 77. Hope you should change the title of the Ukrah. Iamakashnathsarkar (talk) 03:06, 23 June 2018 (UTC) Iamakashnathsarkar (talk) 03:06, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

A kitten for you![edit]

Young cats.jpg

Wow! Your talk page is very beautiful, Did you have created it. I want to tell that in Race 3 page the gross that have been given is only 8 days , If you click the reliable source that have been provided , Then you check that there is given 230.47 crores but in Race 3 - Wikipedia page there is 212.04 crore. So i respectively request you to please take my edit.

Light Of Won (talk) 03:52, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

About Corrections on sonalika group page[edit]

Hey! Arjayay, please read the content before deleting.This page is regarding multi-National - Sonalika Group, and the content shared on Wikipedia has supporting which itself justify the authenticity. Also all the content is related to the company like about company, its achievements, their leaders, Operations. Request you to please provide reason of deletion as this is not an advertisement as we understand the quality of content to be published in Wikipedia, the content is all about the company only. Request you to please understand. for example please look at Mahindra & Mahindra. User:Ashray007 Ashray007 (talk) 05:43, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

No User:Ashray007, that content was blatantly promotional, so there is no point in saying it was "not an advertisement", and we don't include lengthy resumes of members of staff in our articles in any case. The phrase "shared on Wikipedia" seems to confirm that you have a conflict of interest, about which you have already been warned, but chosen to ignore. I note that User:Rajpal2 a brand new account reinserted the same material, in their first and only edit, which suggests that you are operating at least two accounts, User:Sonalika.wiki having already been blocked for making promotional additions.
Please note that it is not just me that thinks your additions are unacceptably promotional, User:Bbb23, an administrator, and User:Mean as custard, a very experienced editor, have also deleted the same material, for the same reasons. Please stop before you are blocked, and/or the page is protected. Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 09:00, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Both accounts are now blocked. Let me know if any new accounts pop up at the article.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:16, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Need to talk[edit]

Need to talk — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:B380:7B8D:F78:7041:BA7F:B121 (talk) 05:02, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello IP from Guwahati -
Please put new posts at the bottom of the page, with a title, and please sign all posts on talk pages with 4 tildes ( ~~~~ ) which will add your signature and a timestamp
As for your "need to talk" - as leaving this post was the only edit you have made using that IP address, I have no idea what you want to talk about - Arjayay (talk) 11:28, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Unsourced edits[edit]

Hello, it's Sreeveen. I don't know what the hell are you talking about. You say that i add unsourced edits in Wikipedias. What do you mean to say? Do you mean to say that i am not a good editor. Man, i am only 10 and you need to tell me what i am doing rather than warning me in that way. Before telling me something, ask Von De Leorde what the hell is he doing. Don't try to be over smart. Don't call yourself a responsible editor. You are no one to remove someone's edit without informing him or her. Next time, if you dare to remove my edits, you will have to pay for it. Hope you understand.

Sreeveen (talk) 09:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Sreeveen - Please don't make person threats, like the one you have above, or you are likely to be blocked permanently.
As for your edits, one of Wikipedia's principles is verifiability - you need to cite reliable sources {not IMDB, fansites or blogs) to support the information you add. For information on how to cite references, please seeHelp:Referencing for beginners. Any information which is not sourced can/should be deleted. Please try to understand, it is not the deleting editor's responsibility to inform you, it is your responsibility to provide the references when you add things to our articles. - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 12:42, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Oh, hello, don't be over smart. How dare you remove my edits from Wikipedias. You have no right to do so. Don't be so stupid and idiot. If you do it once again, you will have to pay for it. Don't think that i am kidding or threatening you. Threats are not always taken lightly like you are doing. Stop your madness or else i hv to start mine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sreeveen (talkcontribs) 16:36, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Sock[edit]

Yaditiva is the sock of 2409:4063:200b:91da:b5ac:233d:9072:4d17, right? ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 13:19, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi Abelmoschus Esculentus looks very likely, but it is not against the rules to edit logged in and logged out, providing the editor is not "gaming the system" - e.g. avoiding 3RR etc - Arjayay (talk) 13:21, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Wait... Using multiple accounts to bypass 3RR is prohibited and both accounts will be blocked. The three-revert rule applies per person, not per account; reverts made by multiple accounts operated by one editor count together. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 13:26, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Abelmoschus Esculentus - yes - that's why I said "providing the editor is not "gaming the system" - e.g. avoiding 3RR etc" - Arjayay (talk) 13:46, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Seems I misinterpret that! No need to open a SPI case. They'll be blocked anyway. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 13:49, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Arjayay[edit]

Arjayay, you are really a bastard. Sreeveen (talk) 09:20, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Sreeveen - your block for making personal attacks has just expired, and this is your first edit - I suggest that you remove it and apologise - Arjayay (talk) 09:39, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

You cannot do anything, idiot.

@Sreeveen: Do you want an indef block? If not then I suggest you stop personal attacking and harassing fellow Wikipedia editors. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 10:19, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Re: Page Editing[edit]

Arjayay,

Why are you attempting to clean up articles regarding a sport you have no clue about. I am trying to update my local club's Wikipedia entry and you delete it without even a second thought?

Sources that you are looking for in regards to the club are simply not available online, I am quoting directly from the club's history books. It is after all, a local club.

How are small clubs supposed to ever update their pages with 'admins' such as yourself constantly deleting information based on entirely nothing?

I implore you to restore the edit, as it was originally placed.

If not, whatever. We're done here. Enjoy your fake power. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:BB6:9308:C158:4C49:8286:E60D:EBC4 (talk) 15:49, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello IP from Ireland - I assume you are talking about Ballymote GAA - I accepted that your edits were made in "good faith" when deleting them.
Wikipedia has several basic principles, including WP:Verifiability - that all information should be verifiable from reliable, published sources. The information does not need to be on-line, but it does need to be published, by a reliable publisher with a reputation for fact-checking, not the organization itself. Local newspapers are often used to provide citations for local organisations, although their reliability is sometimes questioned, whilst local history books can also be used.
Without such sources, we have no idea whether the "information" is true, or not. I appreciate this is difficult for many small organisations, but these rules apply across the whole of Wikipedia, - Arjayay (talk) 16:01, 19 July 2018 (UTC)


Arjayay,

Did you even read the excerpt you deleted? Most of the information is from the late 19th, early 20th centuries. If you can find local sources for that information more power to you. This is a disgrace, if you wish to keep this site UP TO DATE then allow people to provide information about things you know nothing about, and if there is a complaint then remove it. Don't quote sitewide rules when they cannot possibly be applied in any sense of the word based on this particular edit. I suggest you allow IRISH contributors to make a judgement on an IRISH information page edit, rather than quoting a company line and deleting information for the sake of it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:BB6:9308:C158:4C49:8286:E60D:EBC4 (talk) 16:49, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Unfortunately, you have a common misunderstanding about who "should" edit which articles. As you say this is your club, you appear to have a conflict of interest, so it is you who should not be editing the article in any case.
Wikipedia is not interested in where editors are from, what they "know", or what they have been told; it is only interested in what Independent, Reliable Sources have already written about the subject. It is, actually, much easier for an editor without any "insider knowledge" to present that information, from a Neutral point of view, as they only use the verifiable information, without unsourced embellishments.
As for your statement "Don't quote sitewide rules" - that is precisely what they are, sitewide rules, which govern all our articles. - Arjayay (talk) 17:16, 19 July 2018 (UTC)


What happened to first hand information, handed from club historians - you are blinded by these 'rules' and apply them ridiculously when you know this is not possible in this case. Who is going to update the page then - you? Ok, what can you tell me about the club from 1886 to present day? Conflict of interest... LOL. I'm merely trying to provide Wikipedia, and as a result the wider platform that views the site - information on the club. I live in the locale, but again here you go presuming. It is not MY club, it is a voluntary, community based organisation in Ireland that I happen to have a strong interest in. I would in fact say I'm the PERFECT candidate to edit the page. And HA! Reliable information on Wikipedia? You really have a high opinion of yourself to go with that condescending attitude don't you. Again, I ask you to READ the edit you removed. Where are these 'embellishments' that you claim. It is a first hand, factual history of the club that was clearly lacking. But seeing as you want to hide behind rules and not make any sort of exception, I'm not going to waste any more time on this. I'll be back with sources to back up my facts, and then I'll be here to rub your arrogant face in it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:BB6:9308:C158:4C49:8286:E60D:EBC4 (talk) 17:28, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

I look forward to reading your sourced additions - Arjayay (talk) 17:32, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Please check religion in nigeria for correct figures[edit]

hey! Am trying to put in the correct figures of Nigerian Christians according Pew research. I am a nigeria citizen and i have and know more about Nigeria morethan you So restrained from editing what i added.. For more info check religion in nigeria — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dankafanchan (talkcontribs) 16:00, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Dankafanchan Wikipedia is not at all interested in where you are from, or what you "know" it is only interested in what Independent, Reliable Sources have already written about the subject.
The CIA factbook, as cited in the article, is generally considered such a source, is cited in the article, and it clearly states 40%, Pew Research also fairly reliable, and it states 80 Million - whereas YOU keep adding figures, which are NOT supported by the cited sources.
If there are alternative, Independent, Reliable Sources giving the figures you keep adding, then you must cite them, not just change the figures. If you continue entering false figures, as you keep doing, you will end up being blocked. - Arjayay (talk) 16:16, 20 July 2018 (UTC)