User talk:Ark55-0

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Ways to improve Mill Lane, West Midlands[edit]

Hi, I'm NearEMPTiness. Ark55-0, thanks for creating Mill Lane, West Midlands!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I am a bit puzzled about the fatal car accidents and suicides in the area. Is the number unusually high? Are there any references on this

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. NearEMPTiness (talk) 20:21, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Ways to improve 2000 Dover incident[edit]

Hi, I'm Salimfadhley. Ark55-0, thanks for creating 2000 Dover incident!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I'm not sure that this historical event was ever referred to widely as the "2000 Dover incident", it might be worth looking into a better title in order to help readers find this content.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Salimfadhley (talk) 11:19, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wiener Neustadt tornado, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ORF. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 31[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Skyway Enterprises Flight 7101, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:50, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Skyway Enterprises Flight 7101 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Skyway Enterprises Flight 7101 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skyway Enterprises Flight 7101 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Petebutt (talk) 22:12, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Ark55-0. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Category:Attacks in 2014.
Message added 13:56, 4 November 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

NorthAmerica1000 13:56, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Air Wisconsin Flight 965 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Air Wisconsin Flight 965 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Wisconsin Flight 965 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Avono♂ (talk) 17:17, 5 November 2014 (UTC)