User talk:ArtifexMayhem

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome!

Hello, ArtifexMayhem, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Ian.thomson (talk) 00:38, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Links and stuff

Abortion[edit]

Aristotle? Well, that's got to be the least controversial edit ever done to the article. OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 04:34, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

I figured I should put something down before I ripped out that unsourced, factually wrong, Hippocratic Oath bit of fucking insane propaganda and replaced it with reality. That will be more interesting :) Nice Marlin karma btw. ArtifexMayhem (talk) 05:45, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
I was just coming here to thank you for catching that one.
Meanwhile, there's a bit of Leviticus or Deuteronomy that says, roughly, that if you beat a woman to death, you shall be put to death. (That happens a lot in those books.) However, if you beat her just enough that she has a miscarriage, you just have to give her husband some money. So much for the value of fetuses. I'll try to find some non-OR way to work it in after the forthcoming Hippocrates brouhaha. PhGustaf (talk) 04:53, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
I also like this bit...."In the 20th century the Soviet Union (1919), Iceland (1935) and Sweden (1938)....legalize certain or all forms of abortion. In 1935 Nazi Germany..."
Can you find the two red herrings? ArtifexMayhem (talk) 06:03, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Poking around, I see that Judaism and abortion already quotes Exodus 21:22-23. Not sure whether that would fit in the top article, but I'll think about it. PhGustaf (talk) 06:26, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

WikiDefender Barnstar Hires.png The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
For scientifically explaining why WTC7 was not exploded due to bombs, thermite, or any variant thereof. Toa Nidhiki05 04:48, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Many thanks. Getting it into the articles will be the hard bit. Do you it's time the Collapse of 7 World Trade Center article? Again, thanks for the message. — ArtifexMayhem (talk) 05:36, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

DS at GMO articles[edit]

Commons-emblem-notice.svg This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all pages relating to to genetically modified organisms and agricultural biotechnology, including glyphosate, broadly interpreted, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Just so you're aware. Be especially mindful of edit warring sanctions such as 1RR now that you're aware. Kingofaces43 (talk) 01:37, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

@Kingofaces43: Thanks for the info. I was actually considering placing the Ds alert here myself. You've me the trouble of finding the template :) — ArtifexMayhem (talk) 01:45, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
No problem. I'll also point out that I'm usually pretty across the board on posting edit warring notices for all involved unless certain editors are the main issue. In this case though, the others are edit warring in content that already didn't have consensus on the talk page. So close after the close of the case, I don't imagine people at WP:AE will have much patience for anyone involved if it goes there, so still best to be really wary about any edit at this point. Kingofaces43 (talk) 02:13, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Oh and FYI as I mentioned your edit[1] (a bit off topic given the section title), but the source is actually a secondary sources since it's a review article. Kingofaces43 (talk) 04:49, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Got it. I should be able to respond there shortly. — ArtifexMayhem (talk) 05:16, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Delete Paper Abortion[edit]

Hey, are you going to chip in? Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Paper_Abortion

Triacylglyceride (talk) 13:32, 23 March 2016 (UTC)