Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Michael H. Hart, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found . Thank you. Gfoley4 | Need to chat? My track record 18:56, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Michael H. Hart. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found . Thank you. Gfoley4 | Need to chat? My track record 19:01, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Just in case you don't understand what Wikipedia is, it's an encyclopedia and not a social network site. The article Michael H. Hart is *about* Mr Hart, and is not written by him - it is not a forum where you can communicate with him. So if you have something to say to him, you'll have to find a way of contacting him via some other route. Best regards -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:05, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Atif Sattar Arieen,Business Man,now resident of Lahore,Pakistan, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Kolbasz (talk) 12:53, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Articles need to have what we call notability, and we have our own criteria for that. For people, it's at WP:People and associated pages. People added to lists should have articles first. Dougweller (talk) 14:51, 30 October 2013 (UTC)