- According to Wikipedia Freeware (portmanteau of "free" and "software") is software that is available for use at no cost or for an optional fee, but usually with one or more restricted usage rights. Freeware is in contrast to commercial software, which is typically sold for profit, . . . etc. CumFreq is totally free and has no restricted user rights. CumFreq is also software, hence it is free software. The website owner wrote me that the source code can be made available on request without restriction (but not for commercial purposes). Asitgoes (talk) 19:21, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Template:Distribution fitting software has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Melcombe (talk) 23:54, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Distribution fitting may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Distribution fitting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Duality (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Nomination of NormDis, normal probability distribution calculator for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NormDis, normal probability distribution calculator is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NormDis, normal probability distribution calculator until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NW (Talk) 17:08, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)