User talk:Auntof6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Nohat-logo-XI-big-text.png This user is one of the 400 most active English Wikipedians of all time.

RE: Catherine of Brunswick and whatever[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Auntof6. You have new messages at Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Happy New Year, Auntof6![edit]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors![edit]

please help translate this message into the local language
Wiki Project Med Foundation logo.svg The Cure Award
In 2015 you were one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs, and we would love to collaborate further.

Thanks again :) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 03:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedians who are not a Wikipedian category[edit]

Hello Auntof6. Per the deletion discussion here, the category was deleted, however there was no mandate for the users to remove the red-linked category. I think you should revert your removals. Cheers, --kelapstick(bainuu) 08:00, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Oops, you're right. I will revert, but I might not have time to do it until this weekend. Thanks for your note, and I apologize for the mistake. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:30, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Not at all, you're not the first, and I am sure will not be the last. I am sure that many of them will be reverted by the user in question by the weekend, so it may all be done for you by then. All the best, --kelapstick(bainuu) 08:35, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
  • I rolled most of them back for you - you may want to check through. — xaosflux Talk 11:39, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, Xaosflux. I checked and the category is back on all the pages I removed it from. --Auntof6 (talk) 02:50, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • @Auntof6: I really appreciate the gesture of removing the red-linked category for my page (and for others), but this category is an exception, I think because this is seen as a Wikipedia internal joke. I appreciate what you were trying to do, though. Regards, epicgenius (talk) 12:45, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, Epicgenius. I appreciate your understanding. --Auntof6 (talk) 02:50, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Keep your fingers off my Talk & User pages[edit]

IHTS 10:32, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

No need to be rude, User:Ihardlythinkso. It was an honest mistake, and not directed at you personally. --Auntof6 (talk) 19:54, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
"I will revert, but I might not have time to do it until this weekend." Oh give me a break. (You need "the weekend" to make single clicks on a keyboard to revert your changes?? Meanwhile you do have time to post that response??) IHTS (talk) 08:24, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
I repeat: there's no need to be rude. I wanted to do Kelapstick the courtesy of letting him/her know that I had seen his/her message and that I recognized my mistake. I felt I should take the time to do that right away, just as I'm taking the time to answer you right now. Responding to a message and reverting a set of edits are two different types of work, requiring different levels of concentration. For the latter, I'd wait until I was able to give it enough attention. --Auntof6 (talk) 09:32, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Auntof6, I very much enjoy working with you on Simple Wikipedia. It has been a lasting relationship for almost four years. There I have the greatest respect for you as an admin and advisor. But you have no idea how much sorrow this intrusion brings me. This category was lovingly guarded for us who chose to live in it by User:28bytes an admin of the kindest and most considerate standards. I have many sorrowful trials in my life and the beauty and sanctity of my user page (cats speaking in babel and paw pats and memorial to Laika and all) is my solace. This includes my right to have redlinked categories.(Please refer to User:Drmies, who is not only an administrator but a current arbitrator. And you deined to remove this very same category from his user page as well !!!. It is beyond me why you would feel the need to raise this issue from the grave. My talk page edit notice says : No alarming the cat. If your edit will bring me sadness, please leave hearts and flowers instead. I contribute here for happiness; as an enchantment against sorrow. I offer kindness whenever possible. Remember the same for me. Thanks very much and enter Why the sorrow? Fylbecatulous talk 13:24, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
@Fylbecatulous: I have acknowledged my mistake, apologized, and the category has been put back on all the pages. There was no intent to upset or offend anyone. I don't see what else anyone could expect me to do about this. --Auntof6 (talk) 17:41, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Auntof6. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)